ITB -The Supply, Installation, and Commissioning of Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) Equipment For Princess Muna Al-Hussein Maternity Hospital at The King Hussein Medical Center/RMS in Jordan

New amendment added #3: Amendment No. 3 was issued to separate the following items from Lot 7 and include them under a new Lot 8:Item 1: Ultrasonic Cleaner, Free StandingItem 2: Rapid Reader Incubator for Steam SterilizerItem 2.1: Steam IndicatorsPlease note that no changes were made to the technical specifications of these items. The amendment only revised the lot structure by transferring the above items from Lot 7 to the newly created Lot 8.The updated Version 2 (Ver. 2) documents are available under the Documents tab:ITB_Section_II_Schedule of Requirements CSSD -ITB-2026-62971 (REV.2) (Word format)ITB_Section_III_Returnable Bidding Forms CSSD -ITB-2026-62971 (REV.2) (Word format)Form C-1 _ Price Schedule Form -ITB-2026-62971 (REV.2) (Excel format)

New amendment added #2: This amendment is issued to upload the Minutes of the pre-bid meeting under the e-sourcing portal (Documents) tab  

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:We would like to request that item #1 (Ultrasonic Cleaner, Free Standing) and item #2 (Rapid Reader Incubator for Steam Sterilizer) be removed from Lot #7, as these items are devices not medical furniture. If a separate lot is not possible, we suggest moving them to another appropriate lot, such as Lot #5 with the Rotary Heat Sealing Machine (Sealer, Pouch). These two items are independent of the medical furniture included in Lot #7 and do not fall within the typical scope of suppliers and distributors specializing in CSSD furniture. Keeping them within the same lot may unnecessarily limit participation.UNOPS Answer:Please note that the items will remain in Lot #7 as currently structured. The lots are divided based on the standardization of brand names, and all other CSSD equipment and furniture are combined together. Please note that a Manufacturer Authorization Form (MAF) is not required for these items, which ensures that participation is not limited.Regards

New clarification added: After reviewing the Bidder Eligibility requirements, we kindly request clarification on the following points:Regarding this eligibility requirements and the mentioned countries , kindly advise if  these countries are eligibility requirements for the bidder only  or also for the ( Source ) (The country from which the commodity is shipped.)   , As restricting the source (The country from which the commodity is shipped) to these eligible countries will imply all recommended brands will be non-compliantPlease clarify clearly the eligible countries for ( Source ) (The country from which the commodity is shipped)UNOPS Response: The eligibility list (Low-Income Countries, Lower-Middle-Income Countries, the United States, and the Cooperating/Recipient Country) applies to both the Bidder's Nationality and the Source of the commodities.However, in accordance with USAID Geographic Code 937 rules regarding local procurement and standard commercial availability, a commodity is considered compliant with the source requirements if it is purchased from and shipped by a local vendor operating within an eligible Code 937 country (such as Jordan), even if the item was originally manufactured in a non-Code 937 country.Therefore, if the recommended brands are regularly stocked, sold, and shipped by a supplier legally registered and operating within an eligible country (e.g., Jordan or the US), the Source requirement is fully met, and the items are compliant. Please clarify the Eligible Countries for the ( manufacturer )  UNOPS Response: There is no restriction on the country of manufacture, provided that the manufacturer does not originate from a USAID Prohibited Source country. The product qualifies under Code 937 regulations regardless of where it was manufactured, as long as it is supplied and shipped through a vendor/distributor located within an eligible Code 937 country.Regarding the Definition of Nationality "Nationality: The country of legal registration of the supplier"Please confirm that the term "supplier" in this context refers to the Bidder submitting the proposal.UNOPS Response: Confirmed. In the context of the "Nationality" criteria, the term "supplier" refers directly to the Bidder (the legal entity) submitting the proposal. If the proposal is submitted by a Partnership, Consortium, or Joint Venture, all partners and any proposed subcontractors must independently meet these nationality eligibility requirements.Regarding the below Term :"Eligibility Declaration : Bidders must submit an eligibility declaration confirming that the goods are shipped from a country included in the eligibility list."Please identify the eligibility list for the source where the goods are shipped , As if you mean by Eligible Countries as mentioned in point (1-Nationality ) in the Bidder Eligibility this will imply all recommended brands will be non-compliantUNOPS Response: The eligibility list for the Source is indeed the same list referenced in Section 1 (USAID Geographic Code 937, which includes Low-Income, Lower-Middle-Income countries, the United States, and the cooperating country, Jordan).As clarified in Response #1, this does not render your recommended brands non-compliant. The "Eligibility Declaration" requires you to confirm that the goods are being shipped to the final destination from a commercial supplier/vendor located within an authorized Code 937 country (e.g., shipped from a distributor's warehouse in Jordan or the US), not that the factory where the goods were originally manufactured is located there.

New clarification added: After reviewing the Bidder Eligibility requirements, we kindly request clarification on the following points:Regarding this eligibility requirements and the mentioned countries , kindly advise if  these countries are eligibility requirements for the bidder only  or also for the ( Source ) (The country from which the commodity is shipped.)   , As restricting the source (The country from which the commodity is shipped) to these eligible countries will imply all recommended brands will be non-compliantPlease clarify clearly the eligible countries for ( Source ) (The country from which the commodity is shipped)UNOPS Response: The eligibility list (Low-Income Countries, Lower-Middle-Income Countries, the United States, and the Cooperating/Recipient Country) applies to both the Bidder's Nationality and the Source of the commodities.However, in accordance with USAID Geographic Code 937 rules regarding local procurement and standard commercial availability, a commodity is considered compliant with the source requirements if it is purchased from and shipped by a local vendor operating within an eligible Code 937 country (such as Jordan), even if the item was originally manufactured in a non-Code 937 country.Therefore, if the recommended brands are regularly stocked, sold, and shipped by a supplier legally registered and operating within an eligible country (e.g., Jordan or the US), the Source requirement is fully met, and the items are compliant. Please clarify the Eligible Countries for the ( manufacturer )  UNOPS Response: There is no restriction on the country of manufacture, provided that the manufacturer does not originate from a USAID Prohibited Source country. The product qualifies under Code 937 regulations regardless of where it was manufactured, as long as it is supplied and shipped through a vendor/distributor located within an eligible Code 937 country.Regarding the Definition of Nationality "Nationality: The country of legal registration of the supplier"Please confirm that the term "supplier" in this context refers to the Bidder submitting the proposal.UNOPS Response: Confirmed. In the context of the "Nationality" criteria, the term "supplier" refers directly to the Bidder (the legal entity) submitting the proposal. If the proposal is submitted by a Partnership, Consortium, or Joint Venture, all partners and any proposed subcontractors must independently meet these nationality eligibility requirements.Regarding the below Term :"Eligibility Declaration : Bidders must submit an eligibility declaration confirming that the goods are shipped from a country included in the eligibility list."Please identify the eligibility list for the source where the goods are shipped , As if you mean by Eligible Countries as mentioned in point (1-Nationality ) in the Bidder Eligibility this will imply all recommended brands will be non-compliantUNOPS Response: The eligibility list for the Source is indeed the same list referenced in Section 1 (USAID Geographic Code 937, which includes Low-Income, Lower-Middle-Income countries, the United States, and the cooperating country, Jordan).As clarified in Response #1, this does not render your recommended brands non-compliant. The "Eligibility Declaration" requires you to confirm that the goods are being shipped to the final destination from a commercial supplier/vendor located within an authorized Code 937 country (e.g., shipped from a distributor's warehouse in Jordan or the US), not that the factory where the goods were originally manufactured is located there.Regards 

New amendment added #1: This amendment is issued for the following reasons:1. To extend the deadline for clarifications until 21 Jun 2026.2. To extend the tender closing date until 6 Jul 2026.3. To upload the revised documents listed below. Please note that all changes have been highlighted in green within the Word documents:ITB_Section_II_Schedule of Requirements CSSD -ITB-2026-62971 (REV.1) (Word format)ITB_Section_III_Returnable Bidding Forms CSSD -ITB-2026-62971 (REV.1) (Word format)Form C-1 _ Price Schedule Form -ITB-2026-62971 (REV.1) (Excel format)

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:We kindly request an extension of the tender closing date by at least two (2) weeks beyond the current closing date, to allow us sufficient time to review the amended tender documents and ensure full compliance with the revised requirements when preparing our technical and commercial proposal.UNOPS Answer:  Please note that the tender will be extended for an additional week, and the new dates will be published soon.

New clarification added: Bidder's Question: regarding pointof completion certificate for similar project or any other official documentation verifying successeful project delivery .please note that we submit reference list  similar project in DRMS and MOH you can visit the sites no completion certoificate can be submitted .UNOPS Answer: Please note that you can submit any proof of successful project completion, such as a client receipt confirmation or an invoiced stamped by the client's with details

New clarification added: Bidder's Question: For LOT # 1 : Regarding you answer for amending the specification of the dual temopreture sesore and accepting to change it to PT1000 instead of PT100 , kindly to remain both the PT 100 & PT 1000UNOPS Answer: The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:For LOT # 1 : Regarding your answer  for Spec 6.B , Please clarify if the requested is  LCD screen on both lodaing and unloading side UNOPS Answer: Yes, the specification requires an LCD screen on both the loading and unloading sides of the autoclave.Bidder's Question:Regarding the spare parts list, kindly advise on the required duration for maintaining fixed prices for the spare parts. Also, please confirm whether this period UNOPS Answer: Based on the document, spare parts, consumables, and accessories must be available for a minimum of 10 years from the date of installation and commissioning. Regarding the pricing, the document specifies that spare part prices must remain fixed, with a maximum annual increase of 5%. The document does not explicitly state that this period begins only after the two-year warranty; therefore, it is generally understood that this requirement applies throughout the 10-year availability period.  

New clarification added: Bidders' Questions:1.We kindly request an extension of the tender closing date by at least two (2) weeks beyond the current closing date of 29/06/2026.This extension would provide sufficient time for us to complete the necessary technical and commercial evaluations, coordinate with our manufacturers, and prepare a comprehensive and competitive proposal in accordance with the tender requirements.We would highly appreciate your consideration of this request and look forward to your favorable response. Dear Sir/Madam,2.We are interested in participating in this project and would like to kindly request an extension of the bid submission deadline by 10 days. This additional time will enable us to prepare and submit our most competitive and comprehensive offer for your consideration.We would greatly appreciate your favorable consideration of this request and look forward to your positive response.UNOPS Answer:  Please note that the tender will be extended for an additional week, and the new dates will be published soon.

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:Item 1 and item 2 in lot 7 are devices and they don’t belong to the medical furniture lot, therefore we kindly request for these two items to be separated from lot 7 or allow partial sumbilssion for lot 7.UNOPS Answer: This amendment is not accepted. Please commit to the technical requirements

New clarification added: Bidders Question:We are currently reviewing the tender specifications for the above-referenced project and would like to request a brief clarification regarding the technical requirements.We noted that the requested units in the specifications appear to be exclusive to specific brands. As the authorized agent for an alternative, high-quality brand not explicitly mentioned in the document, we would like to inquire if the committee will consider equivalent alternatives.Could you please confirm if compliant, alternative brands that meet or exceed the required technical specifications will be evaluated fairly? This will help us determine whether we should proceed with preparing a competitive proposal for this tender.UNOPS Answer:Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in this tender.Please be advised that alternative brands will not be considered or evaluated for this tender.The requirement restricting acceptable equipment to the specified brands is final. This standardization is strictly necessary to match the beneficiary's existing technical capacity, specifically the current certifications and prior operational training of their maintenance engineers.This brand-specific requirement has been formally documented by the beneficiary and officially approved by the funding partners to ensure long-term operational sustainability. Consequently, equivalent solutions outside the specified brands cannot be accepted.We appreciate your understanding and thank you for your interest in our projects.Regards

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:Regarding LOT # 7 , kindly find below Clarifications :item #3 -Specs 3 We kindly request approval to amend the required dimensions of the CSSD Instruments Washing Sink from 60 × 45 × 30 cm or larger to 50 × 40 × 30 cm or larger.  The offered sink dimensions are suitable for the intended application and do not affect the functionality, performance, or operational efficiency of the unit. Therefore, we respectfully request acceptance of this specification amendment.UNOPS Answer:This amendment is not accepted. Please commit to the technical requirementsBidder's Question:Specs 7  Please clarify whether you require one Water Gun and one Air Gun, or two Water Guns and two Air Guns.UNOPS Answer:One water gun one air gunItem #4 -Please specify whether you require solid or wire shelving unitUNOPS Answer:Wire shelving unitBidder's Question:Item # 5 & 6​Please explain why the same item is being ordered twice in different quantities: item#5 in quantity 20 and item#6 in quantity 10. Why can't they be combined into one item, especially since they have the same specifications? If there is a difference, please explain.UNOPS Answer: While both items share identical dimensions, Item 5 is intended for standard baskets whereas Item 6 must accommodate both baskets and flat sterilization pouches; however, you may submit the exact same model for both items provided it successfully supports both storage types.Bidder's Question:Item #10​Regarding Specs 2  , Please amend to become 1800X700X900mm UNOPS Answer:The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:Item #11Specs 3 We kindly request clarification on the requirement of accommodating 16 baskets (30 × 30 × 60 cm each) on a Basket Hook Trolley equipped with 8 double-sided hooks or 16 single hooks , Considering the physical dimensions of the baskets, it is not clear how 16 baskets can be safely and practically accommodated without affecting accessibility, stability, or maneuverability. Therefore, we would appreciate receiving a layout drawing or further technical details illustrating the intended basket arrangement. UNOPS Answer:The amendment is accepted (it has been changed to 8 STU, 4 at each side) and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:Item #14​Specs 3 , Please amend to 304 stainless steel instead of 316 UNOPS Answer:The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:Item #18- Please specify the required item and kindly to provide us with an approximate image of it.  UNOPS Answer: As recommended by the beneficiary, the item has been deleted.Bidder's Question:Item #21 -​Spec 1  ,please amend the specification to be Heavy duty stool, height adjustable ,gas spring type or hydraulic cylinder , with adjustable foot ring, armless with back-rest. UNOPS Answer:Please note that Item #18 has been deleted from the list. Consequently, Item #21 (Stool, height adjustable, with foot ring and backrest, for CSSD) has been renumbered as Item #20,The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tab

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:Regarding Lot # 2, Kindly Find Below Clarifications :- Specs 12.d  : We respectfully request a revision of the technical specification requiring a built-in compartment for chemical detergents in the Washer Disinfector.The Washer Disinfector offered by our company utilizes an automated detergent dosing system supplied from external detergent containers rather than an integrated built-in compartment. This design is widely adopted by leading manufacturers and provides the same functionality, dosing accuracy, and operational performance.We would like to emphasize that the primary purpose of this requirement is to ensure the proper storage, supply, and automatic dosing of detergents during the washing and disinfection process. This objective is fully achieved through the external dosing system without any impact on cleaning efficacy, process validation, user safety, or equipment performance.In our standard installation configuration for pass-through washer disinfectors, the detergent dosing unit and chemical containers are typically installed in a dedicated external cabinet located underneath the pass-through window. This arrangement provides easy access for operators, facilitates routine replacement of chemical containers, and simplifies maintenance activities while maintaining a clean and organized working environment.Furthermore, the use of an external dosing unit offers several operational advantages, including:·         Easier replacement and replenishment of chemicals.·         Greater flexibility in selecting detergent container sizes.·         Simplified maintenance and servicing.·         Reduced risk of chemical residue accumulation within the machine.·         Improved accessibility for operators and service personnel.Therefore, limiting the specification to a built-in detergent compartment may unnecessarily exclude technically equivalent solutions that fully satisfy the intended functional requirements.Accordingly, we kindly request that the specification be amended as follows:“Built-in compartment for chemical detergents or an equivalent automatic detergent dosing system utilizing external detergent containers and dosing unit.”or “Automatic chemical dosing system for detergents, whether through a built-in compartment or an external dosing unit, provided that accurate and reliable dosing is ensured.” This amendment will allow technically equivalent systems while maintaining the required performance, safety, and operational standards. UNOPS Answer:This amendment is not accepted. Please commit to the tetender requirements.Regards 

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:Regarding LOT # 1 , Kindly find below Clarifications :- Specs 1.E  : We respectfully request a revision of the technical specification requiring a separate steam supply for the chamber and jacket. The sterilizer offered by our company utilizes a validated steam distribution design whereby steam is supplied to the jacket first and subsequently transferred from the jacket to the chamber. This engineering approach is widely adopted by leading sterilizer manufacturers and provides equivalent sterilization performance to systems employing separate steam supplies. We would like to emphasize that this design:Does not affect sterilization efficacy or cycle performance.Ensures uniform steam distribution and temperature control within the chamber.Meets all required sterilization parameters and operational requirements.Provides reliable and safe operation in accordance with applicable international standards.Represents an equivalent technical solution that achieves the intended functional and performance objectives of the specification. Therefore, we kindly request that the specification be amended to allow equivalent steam supply configurations, as follows: “Separate steam supply for chamber and jacket, or an equivalent validated steam distribution system that ensures full compliance with all sterilization performance requirements.”Alternatively:“Separate steam supply for chamber and jacket, or steam supply to the jacket with subsequent steam transfer to the chamber, provided that all required sterilization performance criteria are achieved.” This amendment will allow the participation of technically equivalent systems without compromising performance, safety, or compliance with international sterilization standards. - Specs 3.b We respectfully request a revision of the technical specification requiring a pressure transducer to measure steam pressure inside the steam generator. The sterilizer offered by our company is equipped with a pressure switch and pressure gauge for monitoring and controlling steam pressure within the generator. This configuration provides continuous pressure indication, operational control, and safety protection, ensuring reliable generator performance and compliance with the required operating parameters. We would like to emphasize that the primary objective of this requirement is to ensure accurate pressure monitoring and safe operation of the steam generator. The combination of a pressure switch and pressure gauge achieves these objectives effectively and provides an equivalent functional solution.Therefore, restricting the specification to a pressure transducer only may unnecessarily limit technically equivalent designs that meet the same operational and safety requirements.Accordingly, we kindly request that the specification be amended as follows:“Steam generator pressure monitoring system utilizing a pressure transducer or an equivalent arrangement, such as a pressure switch and pressure gauge, capable of ensuring accurate pressure monitoring, control, and safe operation of the steam generator.” This amendment will allow technically equivalent solutions while maintaining the required performance, safety, and reliability standards. UNOPS Answer:This amendment is not accepted. Please commit to the requirements. Regards

New clarification added: Bidder's Clarification Request – LOT 3: Low Temperature H2O2 / Plasma Sterilizer, Double DoorRegarding LOT 3 – Low Temperature H2O2 / Plasma Sterilizer, Double Door, we kindly request the following clarifications and amendments:1. Specification No. 21 – Required Consumablesa. Item 1: "H2O2 cartridges/bottles sufficient to complete a minimum of four hundred (400) standard lumen cycles."We kindly request adding the term "cassette" to the description to accommodate technologies that utilize H2O2 cassettes rather than bottles.b. Item 12: "Plasma / H2O2 Biological Indicator – Qty. (30 boxes of 50)."The requested quantity appears significantly higher than typical operational requirements. Furthermore, most commercially available biological indicators are supplied in boxes containing approximately 30 units rather than 50 units.Therefore, we kindly request revising the required quantity to approximately 5–6 boxes of 30 units, which would better reflect actual clinical consumption and market availability.2. Form C – Price Schedule Form (LOT 3 Evaluation Criteria)We kindly request a review and amendment of the evaluation methodology used in the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculation for Plasma Sterilizers.The Plasma Sterilizer utilizes an electrode located inside the sterilization chamber, which generates plasma and ensures uniform energy distribution throughout the chamber. This process effectively reduces residual hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) to below 0.3 ppm. The electrode is insulated from the chamber walls and forms an integral part of the sterilization space; therefore, instruments placed within this area are effectively sterilized and should be considered part of the usable sterilization capacity.Furthermore, the concept of "Useful Capacity" or "Useful Volume" cannot be accurately assessed based solely on chamber volume, as it depends on the type of medical devices being sterilized, including pouches, containers, and flexible endoscopes.For example:When sterilizing containers, useful capacity should be measured by the number of sterilization containers that can be processed per cycle. Practical comparisons demonstrate that the STERRAD 100NX ALLClear system accommodates the same number of containers as other competing systems.When sterilizing flexible endoscopes, useful capacity should be measured by the number of endoscopes processed per cycle. In most commercially available systems, the capacity is limited to two flexible endoscopes per cycle.When sterilizing pouched instruments, useful capacity varies according to the device type. For instance, the STERRAD 100NX ALLClear system can process up to 40 stainless-steel lumens per cycle, compared to approximately 20 lumens in several competing systems.Based on the above, we believe that evaluating Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) using a fixed calculation of "80,000 L ÷ Useful Volume" may not accurately reflect the actual clinical performance, productivity, and throughput of the sterilizer.Therefore, we respectfully request that the specification and the associated TCO calculation methodology be revised to reflect actual clinical capacity and workload performance rather than relying solely on nominal chamber volume measurements.UNOPS Answer:a. Item 1: (if applicable was added for consumables)b. Item 12: (if applicable was added for consumables)And the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tab2. Form C – Price Schedule Form (LOT 3 Evaluation Criteria) :This amendment is not accepted. Please commit to the technical requirements.Regards

New clarification added: Bidder's Question:We respectfully request clarification regarding the requirement stated in the tender documents:"Due to equipment standardization purposes, the following brands will be accepted only: A, B, C."We note that this  restriction have been applied to all tender items , whereby only specific manufacturers have been designated as acceptable.While we fully recognize the importance of standardization in certain projects, we would appreciate further clarification regarding the specific standardization requirements applicable to this procurement and the basis upon which the acceptable brands for each item have been selected.As we understand that this tender relates to the establishment and/or expansion of a new CSSD department with newly supplied equipment, it is not clear why compatibility with specific manufacturers would be required!! ;  We therefore kindly request clarification regarding the technical, operational, integration, or interoperability requirements that necessitate restricting participation exclusively to the specified manufacturers and excluding other internationally recognized manufacturers from participating in the competition in ( newly established CSSD department )We highly value UNOPS' commitment to transparency, fairness, equal treatment, and open competition. Therefore, we were surprised to encounter restrictions that appear to limit competition to specific manufacturers without a clear technical justification being provided within the tender documents.Accordingly  we would appreciate clarification of the following:What specific standardization requirements justify limiting competition to the specified manufacturers only?Are there existing CSSD systems, sterilizers, washers, loading systems, accessories, carts, racks, software platforms, sterilization tracking systems, or other infrastructure with which the proposed equipment must be compatible?If this project involves a newly established or expanded CSSD department equipped with newly supplied systems, equivalent solutions from other internationally recognized manufacturers shall  be considered, provided that they fully comply with all technical specifications, performance requirements, quality standards, regulatory requirements, and operational needs?What objective technical, operational, or performance criteria were used to determine the acceptable manufacturers listed in the tender and to exclude other internationally recognized manufacturers from participation? Furthermore, we would like to highlight  the fact that this is a USAID-funded project. During the initial Request for Information (RFI) stage, preference was explicitly expressed for U.S.-origin products and manufacturers. Subsequently, and in the interest of promoting fair competition , participation was opened to additional origins through the clarification process. However, it is difficult to understand the rationale for subsequently introducing brand-specific restrictions that effectively prevent a globally recognized U.S. manufacturer from participating in the tender despite its extensive qualifications and proven track record. These projects continue to demonstrate excellent operational performance, reliability, and compliance with international standards. Should the evaluation committee wish to further assess the capabilities and performance of the proposed solutions, we would be pleased to facilitate site visits to existing  installations in Jordan, allowing the committee to directly observe their operational effectiveness and successful implementation. The manufacturer's equipment is widely recognized for its quality, reliability, innovation, compliance with international standards, and long-term operational performance. The manufacturer maintains a strong global reputation and has successfully delivered solutions to leading healthcare institutions around the world. In the interest of transparency, fairness, equal opportunity, and achieving the best value for money while maintaining the highest technical and operational standards, we kindly request responding to our above inquiries ,  reconsideration of the brand-specific restrictions , and to remove this restriction  to open the competition.UNOPS Answer:Thank you for your inquiry and your continued interest in this tender.Regarding your request for clarification on the brand-specific restrictions, please be advised that this requirement is strictly driven by the long-term operational and maintenance needs of the beneficiary.The standardization to these specific manufacturers is justified by the following operational realities:1-Existing Technical Capacity: The beneficiary’s engineering and maintenance teams are already exclusively trained and certified to service these specific models.2-Prior Operational Experience: The beneficiary has extensive, proven experience managing this equipment, ensuring immediate operational continuity and seamless maintenance upon the handover of the new department.While we fully recognize the high quality and global reputation of your proposed U.S. manufacturer, introducing an unfamiliar brand would necessitate extensive retraining and pose significant maintenance risks to the beneficiary’s current operations. Please note that this standardization requirement has been formally documented by the beneficiary and officially approved by the project's funding partners.Therefore, to ensure the long-term sustainability of the project, the requirement restricting acceptable brands to those listed in the tender documents remains unchanged. Equivalent solutions outside these brands will not be accepted for this item.We appreciate your understanding and value your participation in this competitive process.​Regards 

New clarification added: Bidder's Question: Referring to tender specifications and terms, kindly clarify the following:1-     Since there are lots of documents to upload upon submittal, please provide on-line fields to upload documents. The online submittal page does not show all required fields as usual.UNOPS Answer:Please note that the online upload fields for documents are available as usual and are divided into seven lots. The system indicates that documents should be submitted either under all lots, under the main tender, or for a specific lot.Bidder's Question: 2-Advise who will be the responsible party for clearing goods upon arrival, since tender is exempted from customs and taxes. Is it UNOPS or Army?UNOPS Answer: The supplier will handle the customs clearance process, while UNOPS will provide the customs and sales tax exemption letters for supplier .Bidder's Question:3- Regarding storage of goods for maximum 3 months if needed at no additional cost shall be included. Please confirm that this service can be added to group of paid services mentioned in page 3 of schedule of requirements.UNOPS Answer:The Storage of the procured goods shall be provided at no additional cost for a minimum period of three (3) months. If the storage period exceed three months, the bidder is permitted to apply storage fees, and may stated it under the 'Prices for Related Services' schedule Bidder's Question:4- Form C1- excel sheet: please explain the relation of DAP price vs. FCA vs. CPT prices.UNOPS Answer:Form C requires the total delivered cost to be quoted as DAP (Delivered at Place) at the site. In your price submission, you must provide a detailed breakdown that separates the FCA (Free Carrier) cost of the goods (cleared for export) from the associated transport and insurance costs. This breakdown is required to allow the evaluation committee to distinguish between the base cost of the equipment and the logistics/insurance expenses.For more information please check the Incoterms® rulesBidder's Question: 5- Please specify the validity of required spare parts list.UNOPS Answer:The bidders  must ensure that spare parts, consumables, and accessories are available for a minimum of 10 years from the date of installation and commissioning.Bidder's Question: 6-Kindly amend the following technical specification:Lot 1: steam sterilizer: Specs 1.c: work on both central steam and built-in steam generator. Please delete” on both central steam “ since there is no central steam supply at the location as advised earlierUNOPS Answer: The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:Lot 1: steam sterilizer: Specs 1.h: manual emergency shut down. Please Add “or stop program button”UNOPS Answer:its mentioned that (or equivelant), however, more clarification was added and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:Lot 1: steam sterilizer: 7.a: Chamber, jacket & generator should be equipped with overpressure safety valves. Kindly confirm that 3x safety valves are requiredUNOPS Answer: This amendment is not accepted. Please commit to the technical requirementsBidder's Question:Lot 2: washer disinfector: 8: One cycle dedicated for drying should be included (preprogrammed by the manufacturer). Add “or by local agent”UNOPS Answer: The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tab Bidder's Question:Lot 3: low/ temperature H2O2 plasma sterilizer: 3.c:  Limit of at least 20 lumens per cycle. Please amend to “15 lumens” instead of “20”UNOPS Answer: The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question:Lot 3: low/ temperature H2O2 plasma sterilizer: 21.4: Plasma/ H2O2 Pouch: 150 mm x 320 mm Qty. (600)UNOPS Answer: Accepted (if applicable was added for consumables)and the updated tender documents will be published soon under the e-sourcing portal- Documents tabBidder's Question: Delete as this item is not available from major suppliersUNOPS Answer: (if applicable was added for consumables)Lot 3: low/ temperature H2O2 plasma sterilizer: 21.5: Plasma/ H2O2: 250 mm x 600 mm Qty. (600) Delete as this item is not available from major suppliersUNOPS Answer: (if applicable was added for consumables)  

New clarification added: Bidder's Questions:1- LOT 1 item no 1 sterilizer double door 8 STU :-  spec no 6-A :please amend the spec to be dual tempreture sensors PT1000 instead of PT100-spec 6-B : please amend operating panel with alrage user friendly colored LCD screen ≥ 5.7 inches on loading side instead of ≥ 7 inches UNOPS Answer: The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soonBidder's Questions:2- LOT 1 item no 2 washer disinfector  :- spec no 12.d please amend to be external /built in compartment for chemical detergent belimed washer disinfector is a very well known brand complied with FDA ,EU ,british standards with external compartment . UNOPS Answer: The amendment is accepted and the updated tender documents will be published soon