Supply of Laboratory Equipment (Chromatograph & HPLC and GC) for Committee for Sanitary-Epidemiological Welfare and Public Health (SES) of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

New amendment added #3: Amendment No. 3 to ITB/2026/63109This is Amendment No. 3 to ITB/2026/63109. The ITB is hereby amended as follows:Replacement of Technical Bid Form:The document ITB_2026_63109_Section III_Returnable Bidding Forms_Form D_Technical Bid Form_Rev2_17June2026 is hereby replaced by ITB_2026_63109_Section III_Returnable Bidding Forms_Form D_Technical Bid Form_Rev3_18June2026.The revised Technical Bid Form reflects the deletion of the phrase "at least four" from S/N 32 of Lot 1.All other terms and conditions of the ITB remain unchanged.

New clarification added: Q21: Could the bid submission deadline be extended from 25 June 2026 to 04 July 2026, and the clarification deadline from 18 June 2026 to 25 June 2026?A21: Please be advised that the request for extending the deadlines cannot be accommodated due to the tight project implementation timeline.

New amendment added #2: This is Amendment No. 2 to ITB/2026/63109. The ITB is hereby amended as follows:Extension of Deadlines:The bid submission deadline is extended from 22 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 25 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC.Replacement of Technical Bid Form:ITB_2026_63109_Section III_Returnable Bidding Forms_Form D_Technical Bid Form_Rev1_08June2026 is hereby replaced by ITB_2026_63109_Section III_Returnable Bidding Forms_Form D_Technical Bid Form_Rev2_17June2026.All other terms and conditions of the ITB remain unchanged.

New clarification added: Q16: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid chromatograph with MSMS-TOF detectors), S/N 41 states: “MS Sensitivity (ESI): At least 500:1” and S/N 42 states: “MS/MS Sensitivity (ESI): At least 1500:1.” Clarification is requested on whether compliance with these requirements may be assessed based on the overall analytical performance of the instrument under practical working conditions, including its ability to reliably identify analytes and perform accurate quantification in complex matrices, in cases where different manufacturers apply varying sensitivity test conditions, analyte amounts, reference compounds, and signal-to-noise (S/N) calculation methods. Clarification is further requested to ensure consistent interpretation of requirements and fair evaluation of compliance.  A16: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid chromatograph with MS/MS-TOF detectors), S/N 41 states: “MS Sensitivity (ESI): at least 500:1” and S/N 42 states: “MS/MS Sensitivity (ESI): at least 1500:1.” It is acknowledged that different manufacturers of high-resolution mass spectrometers may specify sensitivity in their technical documentation under varying test conditions, including differences in the amount of analyte introduced, test compounds used, and methods applied for signal-to-noise ratio calculation; as a result, a direct comparison of stated S/N values does not always fully reflect the actual analytical performance of the instruments, particularly in complex matrices. At the same time, modern high-resolution mass spectrometry systems are capable of ensuring reliable identification and accurate quantification of target analytes even at moderate signal-to-noise values obtained from standard solutions. In view of the above and taking into account the specific characteristics of modern MS/MS-TOF systems, S/N 41 and S/N 42 are hereby clarified and shall be read as follows: S/N 41 – MS Sensitivity (ESI): at least 500:1, or Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) < 3 fg reserpine on column (Full Scan or targeted SIM); S/N 42 – MS/MS Sensitivity (ESI): at least 1500:1, or Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) < 3 fg reserpine on column (targeted MS²). This clarification is intended to ensure an objective and comparable evaluation of modern mass spectrometry systems, and bidders may demonstrate compliance either by providing values stated in the official technical specification of the instrument or by submitting validation data obtained from real matrix samples.

New clarification added: Q20: Could the bid submission deadline be extended from 22 June 2026 to 25 June 2026 (3 calendar days)?A20: The bid submission deadline is extended from 22 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 25June 2026 at 07:00 UTC, while the deadline for clarifications remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q18: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), S/N 70 states: “Column C18, 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs. Column LC-PAH, 4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs. Column LC-PAH, 4.6 x 250 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs. Column for analysis of melamine type C18, 4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs. All columns must include a guard column and a holder of at least 2 pcs.” Clarification is requested on whether the required quantity of guard columns should be interpreted as 8 units (one guard column per analytical column) or 4 units (one guard column per column type), in order to ensure consistent interpretation of the requirement.A18: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), S/N 70, the following analytical columns are required: Column C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs., Column LC-PAH, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs., Column LC-PAH, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs., and Column for melamine analysis, C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm – 2 pcs., corresponding to a total of eight (8) analytical columns; accordingly, to eliminate ambiguity, S/N 70 is amended to confirm that eight (8) analytical columns shall be supplied, consisting of the four (4) specified column types supplied in duplicate, and that all analytical columns shall be supplied with a compatible guard column protection system consisting of one (1) guard column holder and one (1) set of guard cartridges containing not less than three (3) guard cartridges, with the quantity of guard column holders and guard cartridge sets corresponding to the number of analytical columns supplied, ensuring that each analytical column includes a guard column holder and associated guard column cartridges, and the solicitation documents will be amended accordingly.

New clarification added: Q17: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, the requirement states: “The manufacturer shall provide a valid ISO 14001 Environmental Management System (EMS) certificate.” Clarification is requested on whether this requirement may be excluded, considering that ISO 14001 does not influence the operational properties of the instrument and may unnecessarily limit competition among manufacturers.A17: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, the requirement states: “The manufacturer shall provide a valid ISO 14001 Environmental Management System (EMS) certificate.” This requirement is intended to verify that the manufacturer has implemented an Environmental Management System in accordance with internationally recognized environmental management standards and does not directly relate to the technical performance or operational characteristics of the offered instrument. It provides assurance that the manufacturer maintains structured processes for identifying, managing, and continuously improving its environmental performance and therefore relates to organizational practices and environmental management systems rather than the technical specifications of the equipment itself. Accordingly, bidders shall provide a valid ISO 14001 certificate issued to the manufacturer. Therefore, the requirement remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q15:  According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), S/N 30 states: “Capacity: at least two columns up to 300 mm long with a preheater or guard column installed. Maximum internal diameter of the chromatographic column: up to 5 mm.” We kindly request reconsideration of this requirement and propose revising it to “at least one column up to 300 mm long with a preheater, filter, or guard column installed. Maximum internal diameter of the chromatographic column: up to 5 mm,” noting that the ability to accommodate two columns simultaneously is primarily a convenience feature and does not directly impact chromatographic performance, separation efficiency, temperature control, system robustness, or analytical results, and that such a revision would broaden competition among internationally recognized manufacturers while maintaining the intended analytical performance of the instrument.  A15: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), S/N 30 states: “Capacity: at least two columns up to 300 mm long with a preheater or guard column installed. Maximum internal diameter of the chromatographic column: up to 5 mm.” The current requirement provides for the possibility of installing at least two chromatographic columns up to 300 mm in length. According to the intended use of the system, the liquid chromatograph is designed for the analysis of various classes of compounds in food products and raw materials, including vitamins, amino acids, melamine, mycotoxins, and other substances, where different chromatographic columns and separation conditions are typically required. Under these circumstances, the ability to install two columns simultaneously is a justified requirement, as frequent column and fitting changes are undesirable due to the increased risk of leaks, system contamination, and reduced reproducibility of results. In view of the above, the proposal to revise the requirement to a single-column configuration cannot be accepted. Therefore, the requirement for the ability to accommodate at least two columns up to 300 mm in length remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q14: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), requirement No. 28 states: “Temperature uniformity throughout the entire volume of the thermostatted column compartment: ≤ 1 °C.” Clarification is requested on whether compliance with this requirement may be demonstrated using the manufacturer’s specified temperature stability and temperature accuracy parameters in cases where temperature uniformity is not explicitly reported in the technical documentation, noting that different manufacturers describe column compartment thermal performance using different parameters such as temperature accuracy, stability, and uniformity, and clarification is required to ensure consistent interpretation and fair evaluation of compliance.  A14: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), S/N 28 states: “Temperature uniformity throughout the entire volume of the thermostatted column compartment: ≤ 1 °C.” The requirement is intended to ensure temperature homogeneity in the area where the chromatographic columns are placed, which is essential for minimizing temperature gradients along the column length and maintaining stable separation conditions throughout the analysis. In cases where temperature uniformity is not explicitly stated in the manufacturer’s technical documentation, compliance may be demonstrated using relevant temperature performance parameters, such as temperature accuracy and temperature stability, provided that these parameters, together with the description of the thermostat design (including forced air circulation, natural convection, or heating block/radiator configuration) and any available supporting technical justification or test data, adequately demonstrate that temperature variation within the column compartment does not exceed 1 °C. Compliance assessment shall be based on the submitted information and its ability to substantiate conformity with the stated requirement. Therefore, the requirement remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q12: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid Chromatograph with MS/MS-TOF Detectors), requirement No. 33 states: “Ion transfer optics must not contain transmission lines, desolvation lines, or capillaries.” Clarification is requested as to whether this requirement refers to a specific ion transfer architecture, noting that many modern ESI/APCI Q-TOF mass spectrometers incorporate ion transfer elements and desolvation regions as part of the atmospheric pressure interface, and clarification is required to ensure correct interpretation of the specification and an accurate assessment of compliance.  A12: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid Chromatograph with MS/MS-TOF Detectors), S/N 33 states: “Ion transfer optics must not contain transmission lines, desolvation lines, or capillaries.” The purpose of this requirement is to ensure reliable transfer of ions from the ion source to the mass analyzer while maintaining the analytical performance of the system. The requirement is not intended to prescribe a specific ion transfer architecture or exclude manufacturer-specific ion transfer technologies. Accordingly, S/N 33 is amended and read as follows: “The system shall incorporate an ion transfer interface designed to provide efficient ion transmission, effective desolvation, and stable analytical performance.” Compliance with this requirement shall be evaluated based on the demonstrated performance of the proposed system, and equivalent ion transfer technologies and interface designs shall be accepted provided that the system meets the specified performance requirements. The amended technical specifications under the subject tender will be uploaded in due course.

New clarification added: Q11: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid Chromatograph with MS/MS-TOF Detectors), requirement No. 32 states: “At least 4 integrated reservoirs for automated system setup and calibration controlled by system software” for the Q-TOF High-Resolution Mass Spectrometer. Clarification is requested on what is meant by “integrated reservoirs,” specifically whether this refers to integrated reservoirs for calibration, tuning or reference solutions within the mass spectrometer, software-controlled automated calibration and system setup functionality, LC system solvent reservoirs, or another specific configuration, in order to ensure an accurate interpretation of the requirement and a correct assessment of compliance.  A11: The ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid Chromatograph with MS/MS-TOF Detectors), S/N 32 refers to dedicated calibration/reference solution reservoirs or an equivalent manufacturer-provided solution enabling automated instrument setup, tuning, calibration, and performance verification without manual intervention. The requirement does not refer to the routine mobile phase solvent reservoirs of the liquid chromatography system. For the avoidance of doubt, S/N 32 is amended and read as follows: “The mass spectrometer shall be equipped with an automated software-controlled calibration and tuning system, including reservoirs for calibration/reference solutions, or an equivalent manufacturer-provided solution enabling automated instrument setup, tuning, calibration, and performance verification without manual intervention.” Equivalent technical solutions providing the same functionality and level of automation may be accepted, provided that the bidder demonstrates compliance with the intended purpose of the requirement. The amended technical specifications under the subject tender will be uploaded in due course.

New clarification added: Q10: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #1 (Liquid Chromatograph with MS/MS-TOF Detectors), S/N 15 states “Flow accuracy: ±0.1%”. Clarification is requested on whether the required value of ±0.1% refers to flow accuracy as the percentage deviation from the programmed flow rate, or to flow precision/reproducibility expressed as %RSD, since these are different performance characteristics typically reported separately by UHPLC manufacturers, and clarification is required to ensure correct interpretation of the requirement and a fair technical evaluation of compliance.  A10: According to the original table of technical requirements (Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 1), the tender documentation clearly distinguishes two separate parameters: Item 13 – Flow rate precision: ≤ ±1.0%; Item 15 – Flow accuracy: ±0.1%. S/N 15 (“Flow accuracy: ±0.1%”) refers specifically to flow accuracy, that is, the maximum deviation of the actual flow rate from the programmed (set) value. It does not refer to flow precision or reproducibility, which is listed as a separate requirement (Item 13) with a less stringent limit (≤ ±1.0%). Therefore, Requirement 15 is interpreted as flow accuracy ±0.1%, in accordance with the terminology used by UHPLC pump manufacturers and the original wording of the technical specifications. The requirement remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q9: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD Detectors), S/N 1: “A high-performance liquid chromatograph is used for highly accurate analysis of liquid samples. It is widely used to analyze vitamins, amino acids, melamine, mycotoxins , and other substances in food products and raw materials.“ Clarification is requested whether the supply of two separate HPLC systems would be acceptable, considering that amino acid and mycotoxin analyses generally require different analytical configurations. Amino acid analysis is typically performed using post-column derivatization, whereas mycotoxin analysis commonly relies on pre-column derivatization or alternative detection configurations. Performing both applications on a single HPLC system may require significant reconfiguration, potentially affecting analytical performance, reproducibility, and operational efficiency.A9: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD Detectors), S/N 1, the supply covers one integrated HPLC system designed for the analysis of vitamins, amino acids, melamine, mycotoxins, and other substances in food products and raw materials. It is acknowledged that amino acid analysis can be performed either by post-column derivatization or by pre-column derivatization, which is carried out directly in the chromatograph’s autosampler. Mycotoxin analysis, in turn, typically does not require post-column derivatization. Despite the differences in methodological approaches, the Terms of Reference do not provide for splitting these tasks between two separate chromatographic systems. The supply of a single integrated HPLC platform is expected, and this platform must be configured to perform all required types of analyses. In this regard, it is clarified that the supply of two separate HPLC systems is not envisaged by the Terms of Reference. The bidder must offer one integrated system that enables the analysis of amino acids (including the possibility of using either pre-column or post-column derivatization), as well as mycotoxins and other compounds, within a single platform. The use of different methods, columns, and detection modes is permitted depending on the substances being analyzed. ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD Detectors), S/N 1 remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q13: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), requirement No. 18 states: “The complete injection cycle time is no more than 35 seconds.” We kindly request reconsideration of this requirement and propose revising it to “no more than 60 seconds,” as modern UHPLC/HPLC systems from leading manufacturers employ different autosampler architectures and operating principles, resulting in varying inject-to-inject cycle times, and while some systems achieve shorter cycle times, others still ensure high analytical performance, robustness, reliability, and adequate sample throughput with cycle times up to 60 seconds; such an adjustment would broaden competition among internationally recognized manufacturers while maintaining the intended analytical performance and operational efficiency of the system.  A13: According to ITB/2026/63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #3 (HPLC with DAD and FLD detectors), S/N 18 states: “The complete injection cycle time is no more than 35 seconds.” The purpose of this requirement is to ensure efficient sample throughput and routine laboratory operation. It is acknowledged that different autosampler designs may achieve comparable analytical performance with different injection cycle times, while maintaining adequate analytical robustness, reliability, and operational efficiency. In view of this, the requirement is revised to allow sufficient flexibility across different manufacturer technologies. Accordingly, S/N 18 is amended and read as follows: “Complete injection cycle time: not more than 60 seconds.” The amended technical specifications under the subject tender will be uploaded in due course.

New amendment added #1: This ITB is hereby amended as follows:1. Extension of Deadlines:The bid submission deadline is extended from 15 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 22 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC.The deadline for submission of clarification requests is extended from 08 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 18 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC.2. Replacement of Technical Bid Form:ITB_2026_63109_Section III_Returnable Bidding Forms_Form D_Technical Bid Form is hereby replaced by ITB_2026_63109_Section III_Returnable Bidding Forms_Form D_Technical Bid Form_Rev1_08June2026.The amendment reflects the following change in the Technical Bid Form:Under Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), Requirement No. 8 has been amended to read: “Built-in or external degasser with at least 2 channels.”All other terms and conditions of the ITB remain unchanged.

New clarification added: Q8: Could the clarification submission deadline be extended from 08 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 18 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC?  A8: The clarification submission deadline is extended from 08 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 18 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC

New clarification added: Q7: Could the bid submission deadline be extended from 15 June 2026 to 22 June 2026 (7 calendar days)?A7: The bid submission deadline will be extended from 15 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC to 22 June 2026 at 07:00 UTC, while the deadline for clarifications remains unchanged.

New clarification added: Q6: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 35 states: “The software must have a Russian-language interface or Russian-language documentation.” Clarification is requested whether software with an English-language interface may be considered compliant, provided that Russian-language documentation is supplied, as English is the standard language commonly used in scientific and analytical software applications.  A6: The offered software shall either have a Russian-language interface or be supplied with Russian-language user documentation and technical literature. Software with an English-language interface may be accepted if a Russian-language interface is not available, provided that all technical documentation, user manuals, operating instructions, and other technical literature supplied with the system are provided in Russian language. Compliance with at least one of the above options is mandatory.

New clarification added: Q5: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 26 states: “The client-server software environment must ensure the legitimacy, originality, accuracy, and integrity of electronic records, centralized license management, connection of chromatographic and chromatographic-mass-spectrometric equipment from different manufacturers, data storage, user accounts, automatic archiving schedules, protection, recovery, and preservation of data in normal and abnormal operating modes.” Clarification is requested regarding the requirement for connectivity with chromatographic and chromatographic-mass-spectrometric equipment from different manufacturers, as instrument control software is typically proprietary and designed to operate only with equipment from the same manufacturer. Kindly confirm whether this requirement may be revised or clarified.  A5: The intent of this requirement is to ensure data management and workflow compatibility within the laboratory environment. Full direct instrument control between chromatography and chromatographic-mass-spectrometric systems from different manufacturers is not mandatory. The offered solution shall provide compatibility for data exchange, result review, reporting, and laboratory workflow integration through standard data formats or equivalent mechanisms. Therefore, compliance may be demonstrated through software capabilities enabling interoperability and data exchange rather than direct control of third-party instruments. Accordingly, the requirement remains necessary for the intended use of the system and will not be amended. Please be informed that the requirement under ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 26 will remain unchanged.

New clarification added: Q4: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot #4 GC with FID and MSD, S/N 41 states: “Hydrogen generator (99.9999% purity) and helium cylinder (6.0)”. Please clarify whether local procurement of helium cylinders would be acceptable instead of international supply, considering that helium cylinders are classified as dangerous goods, subject to strict export restrictions, extensive certification requirements, and potentially long lead times. In addition, international freight costs are disproportionately high compared to the intrinsic value of the cylinders. Kindly confirm whether local purchase may be considered as an acceptable alternative.  A4: Please be advised that helium cylinders may be supplied through a local supplier, as all international bidders are required to have local representation, and all offers must be complete and fully functional to ensure immediate utilization by the end user without the need for additional sourcing.

New clarification added: Q3: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 46 refers to “A set of reference materials corresponding to certified reference materials (ISO 17034)”. Clarification is requested regarding the exact category and type of required reference materials, as well as the required quantity or weight per unit (in grams), as these details are not specified in the tender document.  A3: The offer shall include certified reference materials compliant with ISO 17034 covering the following antibiotics in quantities of at least 250 mg per compound: β-lactam antibiotics (amoxicillin, ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, procaine benzylpenicillin, ceftiofur), tetracyclines (chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, tetracycline), macrolides (erythromycin, spiramycin, tilmicosin, tylosin), aminoglycosides (gentamicin, neomycin, dihydrostreptomycin, streptomycin), fluoroquinolones (danofloxacin, flumequine, sarafloxacin), and sulfonamides (sulfadimidine).

New clarification added: Q2: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 34 states: “The software must generate reports in formats not narrower than PDF and Excel”. Clarification is requested whether software capable of generating reports in PDF and Word formats may be considered compliant, where the Word format provides equivalent functionality for data viewing, editing, archiving, and secondary data processing, and whether the requirement may accordingly allow Word or Excel formats in addition to PDF.  A2: The requirement specifies support for both PDF and Excel report formats to meet different reporting and data-processing needs. PDF format is required for generation of finalized reports, while Excel format enables further data analysis, calculations, sorting, filtering, and export to other spreadsheet formats (e.g., CSV). Word format does not provide equivalent functionality for processing and exporting analytical data. Therefore, the requirement remains necessary for the intended use of the system and will not be amended. Please be informed that the requirement under ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 34 will remain unchanged.

New clarification added: Q1: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)) S/N 8 states: “Built-in or external degasser with at least 4 channels”. Clarification is requested whether a system equipped with a binary high-pressure gradient pump, for which degassing is required for two mobile phase channels (Channel A and Channel B) during routine operation, may be considered compliant with a degasser configuration of at least 2 channels, given that 4-channel degassers are typically associated with quaternary low-pressure gradient systems and may not be technically required for binary UHPLC systems.  A1: According to ITB_2026_63109, Section III – Returnable Bidding Forms, Form D – Technical Bid Form, Lot No. 2 (Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)), S/N 8 will be amended as follows: “Built-in or external degasser with at least 2 channels.” The amended technical specifications under the subject tender will be uploaded in due course.