CANCELLED Emergency Procurement: Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast

Tender cancelled on 2026-04-24 07:32 UTC. The requirements require material revision. For any inquiries, please contact Iryna PRYSHCHEPA. Email: IrynaPR@unops.org, Phone: Ukraine 380503250971

New amendment added #4: Dear Bidders,Please be advised that the below amendments are made to the RFQ requirements:RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.2Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsClause 2.6 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.2 has been amended to be read as follows: “Bidder shall have: Operating license and authorizations required under national legislation of the country (Ukraine), or Comply with national or WHO Good Distribution Practices (GDP)/Good Storage Practices (GSP) or have a Quality Management System (QMS) certified in accordance with ISO 9001, or ISO 13485, for the supply of laboratory, medical equipment, or pharmaceutical products”.Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) -11 itemsClause 2.6 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.2 has been amended to be read as follows: “Bidder shall have: Operating license and authorizations required under national legislation of the country (Ukraine), or Comply with national or WHO Good Distribution Practices (GDP)/Good Storage Practices (GSP) or have a Quality Management System (QMS) certified in accordance with ISO 9001, or ISO 13485, for the supply of laboratory, medical equipment, or pharmaceutical products”.Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemClause 2.6 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.2 has been amended to be read as follows: “Bidder shall have: Operating license and authorizations required under national legislation of the country (Ukraine), or Comply with national or WHO Good Distribution Practices (GDP)/Good Storage Practices (GSP) or have a Quality Management System (QMS) certified in accordance with ISO 9001, or ISO 13485, for the supply of laboratory, medical equipment, or pharmaceutical products”.Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 itemClause 2.6 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.2 has been amended to be read as follows: “Bidder shall have: Operating license and authorizations required under national legislation of the country (Ukraine), or Comply with national or WHO Good Distribution Practices (GDP)/Good Storage Practices (GSP) or have a Quality Management System (QMS) certified in accordance with ISO 9001, or ISO 13485, for the supply of laboratory, medical equipment, or pharmaceutical products”.The revisions are reflected in RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast for all Lots.Please check the amendment documents:RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.3RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 4 rev.3RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 3 rev.3RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 2 rev.3RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 1 rev.2In the Documents section.Thank you.Procurement team.

New clarification added: Dear UNOPS,I have checked all documents and I cannot seem to find the below forms as requested for submission. Please can you let me know where these are?FORM A - Quotation submission formFORM B - Price schedule FORM C - Bidder InformationFORM D - Performance Statement FormFORM E - Technical Bid FormFORM G - Manufacture Bid FormFORM F - Self Disclosure Form Also, can you let us know which hospital these items are for please.Thanks/Dear Bidder,Thank you for the interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.1. All Returnable Bidding Forms are included in documentt "RFQ_Section_III_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements_ Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1".2. The Technical requirerments are spesified in RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast for each Lot. 3.  DAP, Kharkiv city,  Kharkiv  oblast, Ukraine. Delivery address and consignee details will be provided to the successful Bidder(s).Please refer to the Documents in Documents Section.Thank you. Procurement Team

New amendment added #3: Dear Bidders,Please be advised that the below amendments are made to the RFQ r-nts:1. RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsClause 1.2.13.4.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1amended to:“Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”. Clause 1.2.13.5.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 amended to:”Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”.Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) -11 itemsClause 1.2.9.5.1 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1amended to:“At least ten (10) types of arrhythmias”.Clause 1.2.9.6.2 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 removed from the r-nts.Clause 1.2.13.4.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision  Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1 amended to:“Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”.Clause 1.2.14.1 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1 amended to:“A minimum of two (2) invasive pressure monitoring channels.”Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemClause 1.2.9.5.1 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-duleof r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 amended to:”At least ten (10) types of arrhythmias.”Clause 1.2.9.6.2 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 removed from the requirements.Clause 1.2.13.4.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 amended to be read as:”Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg.”Clause 1.2.14.1 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 amended to be read as:”A minimum of two (2) invasive pressure monitoring channels.”Clause 1.2.16.1.2 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-duleof r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1 removed from the r-nts.Clause 1.2.16.2.2 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision  Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1 removed from the r-nts.Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 itemClause 1.2.1.3 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 removed from the r-nts.Clause 1.2.6.7.2 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1amended to be read as:”One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCP or HDMI.”Clause 1.2.7.7.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 removed from the requirements.2. The deadline for submission is extended by 09.03.2026.3. The deadline for the clarifications is extended by 03.03.2026.4. Technical revisions are reflected in RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _S-dule of r-nts Provision Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl for all Lots: Lot1, Lot 2, Lot 3, Lot 4.5. Clause 2.7  of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv obl rev.1 has been amended for all Lots and to be read as:”Marketing authorization or recognition from regulatory agencies: the lots offered must meet specific certification or marketing authorization requirements depending on the risk classification of the equipment. These authorizations or certificates must be issued by the regulatory authorities or authorized competent bodies of one of the following countries or regions: European Union: MDR (EU) 2017/745 on Medical Devices in the European Union. Declarations of conformity apply only to class 1 devices. - United States of America: FDA authorization for marketing in the United States of America, - Canada: SOR/98-282, - Australia: TGA Compliance Certification, - Japan: PMDA approval. The marketing authorizations must be valid at the time of submission of the offer and be applicable to the brands and models of equipment offered (these must be indicated in the certifications and/or annexes). If they expire within the next six months, The Bidder must present a letter “commitment to deliver the new certificate before the expiration of the current certificate”. 6. The wording of the Checklist related to the Medical equipment standards has been amended as follows:"Documents evidencing compliance (certificates) of the proposed equipment with Medical equipment standards listed in clause 2.7 of the Section II Schedule of Requirements".Please check the amendment documents:RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.2RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 4 rev.2RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 3 rev.2RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 2 rev.2RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of r-nts Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 1 rev.1In the Documents section.Thank you.Procurement team. 

New clarification added: Dear Sir/Madam,We kindly request clarification as to whether a proposal for the ICU patient monitors together with the Central Monitoring Station (CMS) will be accepted without a monitor for the operating theatre.We would like to inform you that the monitors offered under the other lots are technically compatible only with our Central Monitoring Station. The same situation applies to other manufacturers, as CMS systems are generally designed to operate within a single brand ecosystem. While it is formally possible to apply for separate lots, in practice monitors from different brands are unlikely to function properly with a CMS of another manufacturer.In addition, we have noted that the technical specifications appear to be based on specific models and configurations. This significantly narrows competition and limits participation of alternative suppliers.In this regard, we kindly ask whether the technical specifications could be reviewed and, where possible, adjusted to ensure broader compatibility and fair competition among manufacturers.We would appreciate your clarification.Kind regards,/Dear Bidder,Thank you for the interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.R1.Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 itemRequirement 1.2.1.3Where it was previously stated:“Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia).”This requirement has been removed in its entirety.R2.Regarding the technical specifications, we confirm that they are not based on any specific model. Instead, they are defined according to the type of equipment and establish a minimum technical framework and configuration requirements. These specifications are designed to support healthcare professionals in the continuous monitoring of patients’ vital signs across different hospital wards, ensuring high-quality equipment that is safe for patients, users, the facilities, and the equipment itself.Thank you.Procurement Team

New clarification added: Dear UNOPS,Due to the large list of changes and clarifications, we ask that you extend the deadline for submitting proposals to prepare a high-quality tender proposal./Dear Bidder,Thank you for the interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.The deadline for submission of bids is considered for the extention till 09 March 2026.The deadline for submitting requests for clarification is 03 March 2026. The relevant changes in the system will be made accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team

New clarification added: Dear UNOPS,We kindly request you to clarify and amend several points in the Summary of Requirements for the Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast, specifically:Redundancy of CO2 and Multigas ModulesLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemLot 3 specifies a configuration that includes both a standalone Capnography (CO2) module and a Multigas (AGM) module. Since the Multigas module inherently includes the measurement of CO2 concentration and fully meets all requirements for capnography, we kindly ask you to clarify if a separate CO2 module is mandatory. We propose that the presence of a Multigas module should satisfy the requirement for CO2 monitoring.A Multigas module (Anesthetic Gas Monitor) is a comprehensive sensor designed to measure EtCO2, FiCO2, N2O, O2, and anesthetic agents (Isoflurane, Sevoflurane, etc.) simultaneously. Requiring a separate, standalone CO2 module in addition to a Multigas module results in technical redundancy. This duplication does not provide any additional clinical benefit but leads to an irrational increase in the total cost of the equipment and higher maintenance requirements. Removing this redundancy ensures cost-effectiveness while maintaining full clinical functionality for anesthesia.Therefore, we kindly request the removal of all clauses specifically related to a standalone capnography module, namely:Requirement 1.2.8.1.7, Requirement 1.2.15, Requirement 1.2.15.1, Requirement 1.2.15.2, Requirement 1.2.15.3, Requirement 1.2.15.3.1, Requirement 1.2.15.3.2, Requirement 1.2.15.3.3, Requirement 1.2.15.4, Requirement 1.2.15.4.1, Requirement 1.2.15.4.2, Requirement 1.2.15.5, Requirement  1.7.6, Requirement 1.7.7, Requirement 1.7.7.1, Requirement 1.7.7.2, Requirement 1.8.3, Requirement 1.8.3.1, Requirement 1.8.3.2At the same time, we request to retain Requirements 1.2.16.1.2 and 1.2.16.2.2, which pertains to CO2 concentration measurement as part of the Multigas (AGM) module functionality.We look forward to your response and the respective updates to the tender documentation..Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. All revisions will be reflected in the amended documents, which will be added to the Documents section accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team 

New clarification added: Dear UNOPS Team,Hope this message finds you well. We are reaching out to you to request for a suitable deadline extension. The additional time would allow us to make a comprehensive offer. Kind regards,/Dear Bidder,Thank you for the interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.The deadline for submission of bids is considered for the extention till 09 March 2026.The deadline for submitting requests for clarification is 03 March 2026. The relevant changes in the system will be made accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team

New clarification added: Good day, please clarify, namely:Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 item1.Current requirement:  1.2.6.7.2 and 1.2.7.7.3 – One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCP Proposed change: HDMIThe HDMI interface:·        Is widely adopted and universally compatible with medical-grade displays;·        Is standard in modern medical IT and monitoring systems;·        Provides equivalent high-resolution digital video transmission capabilities.Restricting the requirement exclusively to DisplayPort with HDCP does not provide additional clinical benefit and may unnecessarily narrow the range of compliant suppliers.Allowing HDMI ensures functional equivalence while promoting broader competition.2. With reference to Lot 4 – Central Monitoring Station (1 item), we kindly request clarification regarding the acceptable form of confirmation of technical specifications.Specifically, please confirm whether the compliance of the offered equipment with the technical requirements may be officially confirmed by a  Supplier’s Guarantee Letter, duly signed and stamped, stating that the proposed system fully meets the technical specifications outlined in the tender documentation.This request is made to ensure proper documentation and to avoid any ambiguity in the interpretation of compliance verification requirements during the evaluation process.We would appreciate your clarification on whether such a guarantee letter from the Supplier is considered a sufficient and acceptable document for confirming technical characteristics.For all Lots Kindly clarify whether the completeness of the proposed configuration for all Lots may be confirmed by a duly issued Guarantee Letter from the Supplier officially signed and stamped, confirming that the offered equipment will be supplied in full compliance with the required configuration and all items listed in the technical specifications.We kindly request confirmation that such a Guarantee Letter from the Supplier  will be considered an acceptable and sufficient document for verification of the completeness of configuration during the evaluation process for all Lots.Thank you./Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.R.1.Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 itemReply to 1.2.13.4.4Where it was previously stated:“One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCP”It shall now read:“One (1) × Preferably DisplayPort with HDCP, or HDMI”R.2.The offer shall include a detailed Technical Specification/Offer clearly confirmed by a “Supplier’s Guarantee Letter, duly signed and stamped, stating that the proposed system fully meets the technical specifications outlined in the tender documentation”; nevertheless, the bidder shall submit, together with the offer, all technical documentation necessary to verify compliance with each of the requested technical requirements (e.g., catalogues, technical data sheets, user manuals/instructions for use, and catalogues of parts, accessories, spare parts, consumables, etc.). The documentation must be the manufacturer’s original and current version, clearly identifying the brands and models offered, and must not be altered or modified in any way.It should be clearly noted that all compliance will be verified prior to delivery of the equipment to the Hospital. Any non-compliance discovered at that stage will result in the rejection of the supplied equipment.Thank you.Procurement team.

New clarification added: Good day, please clarify, namely:Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemClause 1.2.12.3.2According to the technical requirements of the documentation, the accuracy of heart rate measurement (Accuracy) is specified as ±2 beats per minute or ±2%.We kindly request clarification whether equipment with a technical specification of Accuracy ±3 bpm, duly confirmed by the manufacturer’s official documentation, would be considered compliant with this requirement.Please note that at certain heart rate values, an accuracy of ±3 bpm may correspond to or be comparable with ±2%, depending on the measurement range.Kindly inform us whether the above-mentioned characteristic may be accepted as equivalent in this case.Clause 1.2.13.4.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Kindly clarify whether equipment with the following accuracy characteristics will be considered compliant:·  Max mean error: ±5 mmHg·  Max standard deviation: 8 mmHgwhich complies with international standards for NIBP accuracy evaluation.We kindly request clarification regarding the interpretation of the “Maximum deviation” parameter and confirmation of the acceptability of the above-mentioned specifications.Clause 1.2.13.5.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Kindly clarify whether equipment with the following accuracy characteristics will be considered compliant:·   Max mean error: ±5 mmHg·  Max standard deviation: 8 mmHgwhich complies with international standards for NIBP accuracy evaluation.We kindly request clarification regarding the interpretation of the “Maximum deviation” parameter and confirmation of the acceptability of the above-mentioned specifications.Clauses 1.2.14.5 to 1.2.14.6We kindly request confirmation whether the invasive blood pressure (IBP) labeling function specified in the equipment user manual will be considered compliant with the following requirement of the tender documentation:Compatibility with pressure monitoring catheters with a labeling function for at least:·   Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP);·  Central Venous Pressure (CVP);·  Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (PAP);·        Right Atrium;·   Left Atrium;as well as the ability to set upper and lower alarm limits for IBP.According to the Instructions for Use, the equipment supports the following IBP labels: Art (Arterial Blood Pressure), CVP (Central Venous Pressure), PA (Pulmonary Artery Pressure), RAP (Right Atrial Pressure), LAP (Left Atrial Pressure).We kindly ask you to confirm that the use of the above-mentioned commonly accepted international abbreviations is fully equivalent to the terminology specified in the requirements.We also kindly request confirmation of the availability of the function to set upper and lower alarm limits for IBP.We would appreciate your confirmation.Clause 1.2.16.2.2 of the Technical Requirements specifies the measurement range for Carbon dioxide (CO₂) as: from 0 to 70 mmHg or wider.We inform you that the equipment proposed by us has a CO₂ measurement range of 0–30%.We kindly request clarification as to whether it is acceptable to indicate the CO₂ measurement range in alternative units — in percent (%) — provided that the corresponding range is equivalent to or wider than the required range specified in mmHg.We also kindly ask you to confirm whether it is possible to supplement the technical requirement by indicating the value in %, alongside mmHg. Clause 1.3.4 of the Technical Requirements states:Rechargeable battery system providing a minimum of 180 minutes of operation during power supply failure.We inform you that the equipment proposed by us ensures autonomous operation for 120 minutes under continuous monitoring of all parameters.Kindly advise whether equipment with 120 minutes of battery operation is acceptable for participation in the procurement procedure./Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 item- Clause 1.2.12.3.2 – Accuracy of ±2 beats per minute or ±2%We appreciate the suggestion provided. However, the requirement remains unchanged: “Accuracy of ±2 beats per minute or ±2%.”.- Clause 1.2.13.4.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.Clause 1.2.13.5.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.- Clauses 1.2.14.5 to 1.2.14.6Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.- Clause 1.2.16.2.2Regarding the monitor’s capability to measure CO2, where it was previously stated:“Carbon dioxide.”“Carbon dioxide (CO₂): From 0 to 70 mmHg or wider.”These requirements have been removed in its entirety.- Clause 1.3.4Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.Revised documents will be added to the Documents section.Thank you.Procurement team.

New clarification added: Good day, please clarify, namely:Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) -11 itemsCurrent requirement: 1.2.12.3.2 – Accuracy of ±2 beats per minute or ±2% Proposed change: Accuracy ±3 bpmAn accuracy of ±3 bpm corresponds to the performance specifications of many modern multi-parameter patient monitors and remains within clinically acceptable limits.From a clinical perspective:·        The difference between ±2 bpm and ±3 bpm does not materially affect assessment of a patient’s hemodynamic condition;·        Many internationally recognized manufacturers declare accuracy in the range of ±2–3 bpm depending on measurement conditions and signal processing algorithms;·        The ±2 bpm requirement may be unnecessarily restrictive and limit competition.The proposed modification ensures an appropriate balance between clinical precision and technological neutrality.  Clause 1.2.13.4.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Kindly clarify whether equipment with the following accuracy characteristics will be considered compliant:·        Max mean error: ±5 mmHg·        Max standard deviation: 8 mmHgwhich complies with international standards for NIBP accuracy evaluation.We kindly request clarification regarding the interpretation of the “Maximum deviation” parameter and confirmation of the acceptability of the above-mentioned specifications. Clause 1.2.13.5.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Kindly clarify whether equipment with the following accuracy characteristics will be considered compliant:·        Max mean error: ±5 mmHg·        Max standard deviation: 8 mmHgwhich complies with international standards for NIBP accuracy evaluation.We kindly request clarification regarding the interpretation of the “Maximum deviation” parameter and confirmation of the acceptability of the above-mentioned specificationsCurrent requirement: 1.2.14.1 – Minimum of three (3) invasive pressure monitoring channels Proposed change: Minimum of two (2) invasive pressure monitoring channelsIn routine clinical practice (operating rooms, intensive care units, post-operative monitoring), 1–2 invasive pressure channels are most commonly used (e.g., arterial pressure and central venous pressure).Requiring three channels:·        Is not standard for base or mid-level monitor configurations;·        Is typically necessary only in highly specialized clinical environments;·        May result in unnecessary cost increases without proportional clinical benefit.Two IBP channels provide sufficient functionality for comprehensive invasive pressure monitoring in the majority of clinical settings.Clauses 1.2.14.5 to 1.2.14.6We kindly request confirmation whether the invasive blood pressure (IBP) labeling function specified in the equipment user manual will be considered compliant with the following requirement of the tender documentation:Compatibility with pressure monitoring catheters with a labeling function for at least:·        Arterial Blood Pressure (ABP);·        Central Venous Pressure (CVP);·        Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (PAP);·        Right Atrium;·        Left Atrium;as well as the ability to set upper and lower alarm limits for IBP.According to the Instructions for Use, the equipment supports the following IBP labels: Art (Arterial Blood Pressure), CVP (Central Venous Pressure), PA (Pulmonary Artery Pressure), RAP (Right Atrial Pressure), LAP (Left Atrial Pressure).We kindly ask you to confirm that the use of the above-mentioned commonly accepted international abbreviations is fully equivalent to the terminology specified in the requirements.We also kindly request confirmation of the availability of the function to set upper and lower alarm limits for IBP.We would appreciate your confirmationThank you./Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) -11 items - Clause 1.2.12.3.2 – Accuracy of ±2 beats per minute or ±2%We appreciate the suggestion provided. However, the requirement remains unchanged: “Accuracy of ±2 beats per minute or ±2%.”.- Clause 1.2.13.4.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.- Clause 1.2.13.5.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.- Clauses 1.2.14.1 – Minimum of three (3) invasive pressure monitoring channelsRegarding the monitor’s capability to measure Invasive Blood Pressure, we accept your proposal:Where it was previously stated:“A minimum of three (3) invasive pressure monitoring channels.”It shall now read:“A minimum of two (2) invasive pressure monitoring channels.”- Clauses 1.2.14.5 to 1.2.14.6Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.The revised documents will be uploaded to the Documents section.Thank you.Procurement team.

New clarification added: Good day, please clarify, namely:Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsClause 1.2.13.4.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Kindly clarify whether equipment with the following accuracy characteristics will be considered compliant:·        Max mean error: ±5 mmHg·        Max standard deviation: 8 mmHgwhich complies with international standards for NIBP accuracy evaluation.We kindly request clarification regarding the interpretation of the “Maximum deviation” parameter and confirmation of the acceptability of the above-mentioned specifications. Clause 1.2.13.5.4 of the Technical Requirements specifies the following parameter: Maximum deviation: ±5 mmHg for non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement.Kindly clarify whether equipment with the following accuracy characteristics will be considered compliant:·        Max mean error: ±5 mmHg·        Max standard deviation: 8 mmHgwhich complies with international standards for NIBP accuracy evaluation.We kindly request clarification regarding the interpretation of the “Maximum deviation” parameter and confirmation of the acceptability of the above-mentioned specificationsThank you!/Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please review amended documents;- RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 1 rev.1, which will be uploaded in the section Documents.Please note that, at this stage, we are unable to assess whether your proposal can be considered compliant or non-compliant. The technical requirement is clearly stated in the different Tender documents and they establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.Thank you.Procurement Team 

New clarification added: Good day!Please clarify whether documents need to be translated from Ukrainian into English: similar contracts, certificates and declarations for goods in Ukrainian and other registration documents issued by the company in Ukrainian.Thank you./Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.Documents: previouse contracts, certificates and declarations for goods in Ukrainian and other registration documents issued by the company do not require translation into English.Thank you.Procurement Team 

New clarification added: Dear Procurement Team,Please note clause 2.7, which applies to all monitor types in this procurement.Since Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) has been repealed and is no longer in force, and medical devices placed on the EU market must comply with Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR), we kindly request to amend the certification requirement in clause 2.7 as follows: “All offered medical/laboratory equipment, tools and consumables shall bear the CE marking in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and/or Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR), or FDA approval or have regulatory approval and marketing authorization issued by one of the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) Founding Member countries or be prequalified by WHO or any conformity according to Product Certification (As per Annex 2b) Y Quality Assurance Policy for the Procurement of Medicines, Medical Devices and other Health Products.”/Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.Where it was previously stated:"Medical equipment standards. All offered medical/laboratory equipment, tools and consumables shall be in possession of European conformity marking (CE Mark), according to Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC directive or 98/79/EC, or FDA approval or have regulatory approval and marketing authorization issued by one of the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) Founding Member countries or be prequalified by WHO or any conformity according to Product Certification (As per Annex 2b) UNOPS Quality Assurance Policy for the Procurement of Medicines, Medical Devices and other Health Products.It shall now read:“Marketing authorization or recognition from regulatory agencies: the lots offered must meet specific certification or marketing authorization requirements depending on the risk classification of the equipment. These authorizations or certificates must be issued by the regulatory authorities or authorized competent bodies of one of the following countries or regions:- European Union: MDR (EU) 2017/745 on Medical Devices in the European Union. Declarations of conformity apply only to class 1 devices.- United States of America: FDA authorization for marketing in the United States of America- Canada: SOR/98-282- Australia: TGA Compliance Certification- Japan: PMDA approvalThe marketing authorizations must be valid at the time of submission of the offer and be applicable to the brands and models of equipment offered (these must be indicated in the certifications and/or annexes). If they expire within the next six months, The BIDDER must present a letter “commitment to deliver the new certificate before the expiration of the current certificate.”The amended documents will be publishe accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team 

New clarification added: Dear partners,Section II: Schedule of requirementsE-Sourcing reference no: RFQ/2026/61493Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastSummary of Requirements for the Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastLot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsLot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 item1.2.13.4.4 Requirement: "Maximum deviation: ± 5 mmHg."We kindly ask you to consider amending this section of the requirements and change it as follows:Maximum deviation: 8 mmHg.The ±5 mmHg requirement is more stringent, but a deviation of ±8 mmHg is within the clinically acceptable margin of error for noninvasive blood pressure measurement. In real-world practice, the variability of the physiological parameter itself between consecutive measurements in a patient may exceed 5 mmHg, which negates the difference between 5 and 8 mmHg in terms of clinical decision-making. Furthermore, many automated NIBP monitors adhere to international accuracy standards (e.g., ISO/AAMI), which allow wider statistical limits while maintaining clinical significance. Therefore, a deviation of 8 mmHg does not reduce the safety or diagnostic value of monitoring compared to the ±5 mmHg requirement.1.2.11.1 Requirement: "At least two (2) channels."Please specify which temperature channels are required: invasive, and one or two skin channels?1.4.1.1 Requirement: "Rolling stands / monitor trolleys."1.4.1.2 Requirement: "Wall mounts."1.4.1.3 Requirement: "Shelf mounts or arms."Please clarify what specific mounts are required to place a correct order.Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 items1.2.13.5.4 Requirement: "Maximum deviation: ± 5 mmHg."We kindly ask you to consider amending this section of the requirements and change it as follows:Maximum deviation: 8 mmHg.The ±5 mmHg requirement is more stringent, but a deviation of ±8 mmHg is within the clinically acceptable margin of error for noninvasive blood pressure measurement. In real-world practice, the variability of the physiological parameter itself between consecutive measurements in a patient may exceed 5 mmHg, which negates the difference between 5 and 8 mmHg in terms of clinical decision-making. Furthermore, many automated NIBP monitors adhere to international accuracy standards (e.g., ISO/AAMI), which allow wider statistical limits while maintaining clinical significance. Therefore, a deviation of 8 mmHg does not reduce the safety or diagnostic value of monitoring compared to the ±5 mmHg requirement.Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 item1.2.9.5.4 Requirement: “Available clinical information: State conditions.”Could you please advise what kind of data should be displayed?Thank you in advance for your attention and cooperation./Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.1.Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsLot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemReply to 1.2.13.4.4Where it was previously stated:“Maximum deviation: ± 5 mmHg.”It shall now read:“Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg.”2.Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsLot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemReply to 1.2.11.1 Regarding the temperature channels, they should support skin sensors as well as esophageal and/or rectal sensors.3.Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsLot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemReply to 1.4.1.1, 1.4.1.2 and 1.4.1.3:The requirement specifies:1.4.1.        Intended for installation on:1.4.1.1        Rolling stands / monitor trolleys.1.4.1.2        Wall mounts.1.4.1.3        Shelf mounts or arms.It means, the proposed patient monitor shall be compatible for installation on rolling stands (monitor trolleys), wall mounts, shelves, or mounting arms. For this specific process, the requirement also indicates:1.7        Accessories included with every supplied unit:1.7.5        One (1) rolling stand or monitor trolley, either of the same brand as the Patient Monitor or specifically recommended by the manufacturer.4.Lot 1 - Patient monitor (Standard configuration) - 2 itemsReply to 1.2.13.5.4Where it was previously stated:“Maximum deviation: ± 5 mmHg.”It shall now read:“Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg.”5.- Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 itemReply to 1.2.9.5.4The data displayed should include, but not be limited to all information, parameters, measurements, that reflect the patient’s current clinical condition based on bedside data, whether in normal, alarm, or warning situations; to alert healthcare professionals accordingly.The amended documents will be posted accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team

New clarification added: Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification to your question.R.1. From the perspective of this process, both options are acceptable. It should be noted that modularity refers to a system architecture composed of independent and interchangeable units (modules) that can be added, removed, upgraded, or reconfigured to adjust capacity, functionality, or performance as required.R.2. Regarding the measurement range for diastolic Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), we acknowledge that multiple high-quality patient monitors are available on the market with varying measurement ranges. However, it is important to ensure the provision of monitors that allow healthcare professionals to effectively manage hypertensive emergencies, thereby minimizing the risk of “out-of-range” measurement errors. From this perspective, the technical specifications establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.R.3. Regarding the measurement range for mean Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), we acknowledge that multiple high-quality patient monitors are available on the market with varying measurement ranges. However, it is important to provide monitors that enable healthcare professionals to access and manage comprehensive patient data, thereby minimizing the risk of “out-of-range” measurement errors.From this perspective, the technical specifications establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.R.4. To ensure safety and optimal performance, only accessories and consumables specified or approved by the manufacturer shall be supplied. The offer shall include a detailed Technical Specification/Offer clearly listing all included accessories and consumables. This list must correspond to the items recommended by the manufacturer of the proposed equipment.R.5. Regarding the monitor’s capability to detect abnormal heart rhythms in real time, we confirm that there are no brand-specific restrictions, as we aim to maintain a competitive environment. Clinical safety is ensured through accurate arrhythmia recognition, and we accept your proposal on the condition that the most life-threatening arrhythmias are included.Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemRequirement 1.2.9.5.1 Where it was previously stated:“At least twenty (20) types of arrhythmias.”It shall now read:“At least ten (10) types of arrhythmias.”R.6. Regarding the monitor’s capability to measure Corrected QT Interval (QTc), we accept your proposal:Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemRequirement 1.2.9.6.2Where it was previously stated:“Corrected QT Interval (QTc).”This requirement has been removed in its entirety.R.7. Regarding the measurement range for pulse rate (PR) within the Oxygen saturation (SpO2) requirements, we acknowledge that multiple high-quality patient monitors are available on the market with varying measurement ranges. However, it is important to provide monitors that enable healthcare professionals to access and manage comprehensive patient data, thereby minimizing the risk of “out-of-range” measurement errors.From this perspective, the technical specifications establish a minimum technical standard. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose technologies considered superior, provided that such proposals are supported by the corresponding technical analysis demonstrating their superiority in relation to the specified requirements.R.8. Regarding the monitor’s capability to measure Invasive Blood Pressure, we accept your proposal:Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemRequirement 1.2.14.1Where it was previously stated:“A minimum of three (3) invasive pressure monitoring channels.”It shall now read:“A minimum of two (2) invasive pressure monitoring channels.”R.9. Regarding the monitor’s capability to measure CO2, we accept your proposal:Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemRequirement 1.2.16.1.2 and 1.2.16.2.2:Where it was previously stated:“Carbon dioxide.”“Carbon dioxide (CO₂): From 0 to 70 mmHg or wider.”These requirements have been removed in its entirety.The amended documents will be posted accordingly.Thank you.Procurerment team.

New amendment added #2: Dear Bidders,Please be advised that the below amendments are made to the RFQ requirements:1. RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastLot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) -11 itemsClause 1.2.7.7 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “With real-time data display and and at least eight (8)  simultaneous curves on screen.”Clause 1.2.13.5.4  of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemClause 1.2.7.7 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “With real-time data display and at least eight (8) simultaneous curves on screen.”Clause 1.2.13.5.4  of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”.Lot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 itemClause 1.2.6.7.1 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been removed from the requirements.Clause 1.2.7.7.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been removed from the requirements.2. RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 2 Clause 1.2.7.7 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “With real-time data display and and at least eight (8)  simultaneous curves on screen.”Clause 1.2.13.5.4  of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”3. RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast Lot 3Clause 1.2.7.7 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “With real-time data display and at least eight (8) simultaneous curves on screen.”Clause 1.2.13.5.4  of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been amended to be read as follows: “Maximum deviation: ± 8 mmHg”.4. RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 4Clause 1.2.6.7.1 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been removed from the requirements.Clause 1.2.7.7.4 of the RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/6149 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast has been removed from the requirements.Please check the amendment documents:RFQ_Section_II_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 4 rev.1RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 3 rev.1RFQ_Section_II_RFQ 2026 61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast_Lot 2 rev.1In the Documents section.Thank you.Procurement team. 

New clarification added: Please advise the hospitals location name and city ./Dear Bidder,Thank you for thew interest in the tender.Please find below the clarification on your question.1. Delivery address and consignee details will be provided to the successful Bidder(s).2. DAP, Kharkiv city,  Kharkiv  oblast, Ukraine.Thank you.Procurermnt team.

New clarification added: Dear SirAre you asking for installation ? if yes what sort of installation would this be if the needed items are just "Plug and play ".The offered units will be covered by International warranty not local one , please confirm acceptance ./Dear Bidder,Thank you for thew interest in the tender.Please find below the clarification on your question.1. Installation - Plug and Play.2. Local after sale service is required. Please refer to the Qualification criteria: " Bidder or producer of the equipment must have a representative office in Ukraine that provides after sale service available in Ukraine or agreement with the local representative of the producer or service company that can provide maintenance of the equipment. Bidder must provide contact details of the service center as well as confirmation from the service center that it will provide after sale services for the proposed equipment."Thank you.Procurermnt team.

New clarification added: Dear partners,Section II: Schedule of requirementsE-Sourcing reference no: RFQ/2026/61493Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastLot 4 - Central monitoring station - 1 item1.2.6.7.1. Requirement: "One (1) × Digital Visual Interface (DVI-D)."The requirement for modern medical monitoring stations to have DVI-D is technically outdated and unreasonably restricts competition. Furthermore, the absence of DVI-D does not impair the clinical characteristics of this equipment.Based on this, we kindly request that you remove this requirement.1.2.6.7.2 Requirement: "One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCP."We kindly ask you to consider amending this point of the requirements and change it as follows:One (1) × DisplayPortHDCP technology was developed to protect commercial multimedia content (videos, movies) from copying and is not used for transmitting or displaying medical data. The central patient monitoring station displays only physiological parameters and does not support DRM-protected content, so HDCP is not functionally enabled. The absence of HDCP does not affect the accuracy, quality, or security of displaying medical information via DisplayPort. Therefore, the requirement for HDCP is not technically necessary for the functionality of the medical monitoring station.1.2.7.7.1 Requirement: "Two (2) × USB 2.0 ports."We kindly ask you to consider amending this point of the requirements and change it as follows:Two (2) × USB 2.0 ports or higher standardUSB 3.0 is fully compatible with USB 2.0 and is a more modern solution. The requirement for a USB 2.0 port does not affect the clinical performance of the device but rather reduces competition.1.2.7.7.3 Requirement: "One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCP."We kindly ask you to consider amending this point of the requirements and change it as follows:One (1) × DisplayPortHDCP technology was developed to protect commercial multimedia content (videos, movies) from copying and is not used for transmitting or displaying medical data. The central patient monitoring station displays only physiological parameters and does not support DRM-protected content, so HDCP is not functionally enabled. The absence of HDCP does not affect the accuracy, quality, or security of displaying medical information via DisplayPort. Therefore, the requirement for HDCP is not technically necessary for the functionality of the medical monitoring station.1.2.7.7.4 Requirement: "One (1) × High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI)."We kindly ask you to consider removing this item from the requirements.The requirement for HDMI is functionally redundant, as the DisplayPort interface provides full digital video signal transmission and supports the connection of HDMI displays via standard passive adapters. DisplayPort is a modern industry standard widely used by leading manufacturers such as HP, Dell, and Lenovo. In terms of technical characteristics, DisplayPort is not inferior to HDMI and in some parameters even surpasses it. Thus, the presence of DisplayPort fully provides the required functionality for connecting an external display, and the requirement for HDMI is not reasonably necessary and does not affect the clinical characteristics of the device.Thank you in advance for your attention and cooperation./Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.With reference to the following requirements:Requirement 1.2.6.7.1: Where it was previously stated:“One (1) × Digital Visual Interface (DVI-D).”This requirement has been removed in its entirety.Requirement 1.2.7.7.4: Where it was previously stated:“One (1) × High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI).”This requirement has been removed in its entirety.With reference to the following requirements:1.2.6.7.2: One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCP1.2.7.7.1: Two (2) × USB 2.0 ports1.2.7.7.3: One (1) × DisplayPort with HDCPWe appreciate the suggestion provided. The technical specifications have been established to ensure that the Central Monitoring Station is equipped with the necessary ports to meet operational requirements. However, we acknowledge the continuous evolution of technology. Accordingly, the listed requirements represent the minimum technical standards. Bidders may, at their discretion, propose  technologies or configurations that they consider superior, provided that such proposals are supported by a comprehensive technical justification clearly demonstrating their equivalence to or superiority over the specified requirements.Thank you.Procurement Team 

New clarification added: Dear partners,Section II: Schedule of requirementsE-Sourcing reference no: RFQ/2026/61493Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastSummary of Requirements for the Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastLot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 item1.2.7.7  Requirement: "With real-time data display and at least twelve (12) simultaneous curves on screen."We kindly ask you to consider amending this point of the requirements and change it as follows:With real-time data display and at least eight (8) simultaneous curves on screen.We are an official dealer of Philips medical equipment. Please consider changing the specifications to 8 simultaneous curves on screen to allow other brands to participate, or specify the functionality for which these monitor parameters are required. If we are talking about ECG, then it is possible to display all 12 leads in real time. The key safety factor is not the number of curves, but the accuracy, continuity, and reliability of the data displayed in real time. Therefore, the availability of eight simultaneous curves provides sufficient clinical functionality without redundancy, is consistent with real-world use and does not degrade the clinical properties of the equipment.Lot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 item1.2.13.5.4 Requirement: "Maximum deviation: ± 5 mmHg."We kindly ask you to consider amending this section of the requirements and change it as follows:Maximum deviation: 8 mmHg.The ±5 mmHg requirement is more stringent, but a deviation of ±8 mmHg is within the clinically acceptable margin of error for noninvasive blood pressure measurement. In real-world practice, the variability of the physiological parameter itself between consecutive measurements in a patient may exceed 5 mmHg, which negates the difference between 5 and 8 mmHg in terms of clinical decision-making. Furthermore, many automated NIBP monitors adhere to international accuracy standards (e.g., ISO/AAMI), which allow wider statistical limits while maintaining clinical significance. Therefore, a deviation of 8 mmHg does not reduce the safety or diagnostic value of monitoring compared to the ±5 mmHg requirement.Thank you in advance for your attention and cooperation./Dear Bidder,Thank you for the your interest in the tender. Please find below clarifications on your questions.Lot 2 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration) - 11 itemsLot 3 - Patient monitor (High-level configuration for anesthesia) - 1 itemRequirement 1.2.7.7. Where it was previously stated:“With real-time data display and at least twelve (12) simultaneous curves on screen.”It shall now read:“With real-time data display and at least eight (8) simultaneous curves on screen.”Requirement 1.2.13.5.4Where it was previously stated:“Maximum deviation: ±  5 mmHg.”It shall now read:“Maximum deviation: ±  8 mmHg.”Thank you.Procuremrnt team.

New amendment added #1: Dear Bidders,Please be advised that the below amendments are made to the RFQ requirements:The deadline for submission is extended by 04.03.2026.The deadline for the clarifications is extended by 25.02.2026.RFQ_Section_III_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblastSection  Form B: Price Schedule Form:The name of  Lot 1 has been amended to be read as follows: Patient monitor (Standard configuration)The name of Lot 2  has been amended to be read as follows: Patient monitor (High-level configuration)Please check the amendment documents:RFQ_Section_III_RFQ/2026/61493 _Schedule of requirements_ Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1 In the Documents section.Thank you.Procurement team. 

New clarification added: Dear UNOPS,I have seen a clarification question regarding an extension. In your response, you confirmed a 14‑day extension, but no further communication has been issued. Please can you also  confirm whether the deadline for clarification questions is going to be extended? Thanks /Dear Bidder,Thank you for your interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification to your question.The deadline for submission of bids is 04 March 2026.The deadline for submitting requests for clarification is 25 February 2026.The relevant changes in the system will be made accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team

New clarification added: Dear Procurement Team,In Form B: Price Schedule Form, page 5, the listed items for Lot 1 and Lot 2 do not correspond to the requested items of the tender.Could you please send a revised Price Schedule Form or do you agree that we can change it ourselves?Thank you very muchClaudia KramerTTM Project Management/Dear Bidder,Thank you for the interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.The revised Schedule RFQ_Section_III_RFQ/2026/61493 _Provision of Patient monitors to Kharkiv oblast rev.1 with te corrected Form B will be uploaded accordingly.Thank you.Procurement Team 

New clarification added: Dear Partners,We hereby express our respect and confirm our interest in participating in the procurement RFQ/2026/61493 “Emergency Procurement: Provision of Patient Monitors in the Kharkiv Region.”Due to the celebration of national holidays in the equipment manufacturer’s country, objective circumstances have arisen that temporarily prevent us from obtaining the necessary permitting and authorization documents required for the proper preparation of our tender proposal.In light of the above, we kindly request your consideration of an extension to the tender submission deadline. Such an extension would enable us to prepare and submit a complete set of documents in full compliance with the procurement requirements and ensure a properly structured and competitive offer.We sincerely appreciate your understanding and thank you in advance for the favorable consideration of our request./Dear Bidder,Thank you for the interest in the tender. Please find below the clarification on your question.The tender is considered for the extention for  an additional 14 days.Thank you.Procurement Team