Triple-to-Double Coincidence Ratio Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer
IAEA
Triple-to-Double Coincidence Ratio Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer
Request for proposal
Reference:
659188-CO
Beneficiary countries or territories:
Austria
Published on:
27-Nov-2025
Deadline on:
12-Dec-2025 17:00 (GMT 1.00)
Description
Triple-to-Double Coincidence Ratio Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer
Email address:
C.I.Ordonez-de-Garcia@iaea.org
First name:
Claudia Ileana
Surname:
Ordonez de Garcia
Telephone country code:
Austria (+43)
Telephone number:
00431260022376
Telephone extension
22376
| Link | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| https://suppliers.iaea.org | IAEA’s Supplier portal |
41104001
-
Sample changers
41104002
-
Sample oxidizer
41104003
-
Sample preparation line
41104004
-
Sample preparation bombs
41104005
-
Laboratory bailers
41104006
-
Coliwasas
41104007
-
Water samplers
41104008
-
Air samplers or collectors
41104009
-
Air sampling pumps
41104010
-
Reagent kits for use with air samplers
41104011
-
Filters or other spare parts for samplers
41104012
-
Dust fall holders or jars
41104013
-
Sulphur dioxide or smoke samplers
41104014
-
Sample applicators
41104015
-
Plant samples analysis equipment
41104017
-
Sample holders
41104018
-
Solid phase extraction preparations
41104020
-
Calcine element flow tray
41104021
-
Fraction collector
41104022
-
Sample shaper
41104023
-
Water sampler accessories
Dear Sirs, please find below two clarifications related to this tender:
Specifications – 9.2, which states: “As this is a trade-in process, the Contractor shall remove the old instrument at the same time of the installation of the System.”
Does the requirement imply a preference for procuring the same brand/system as the existing instrument?
Given the specialized nature of radioactive source handling and disposal, industry standards and regulatory guidelines typically require original equipment manufacturers to manage decommissioning and source recovery. To ensure compliance with safety and environmental regulations, can the removal of the old equipment be handled by the original manufacturer?
Answer: The trade-in under point 9.2 is no longer relevant. This will not be necessary.
Specifications – 4.2.1, which states: “have a counting efficiency of greater than 70 percent.”
Could you please clarify whether a counting efficiency of greater than 65 percent is acceptable?
Answer: Greater than 65 percent counting efficiency is acceptable so long as all other technical performance criteria are met.
Edited on:
03-Dec-2025 11:07
Edited by:
c.i.ordonez-de-garcia@iaea.org
the tender was extended until the 12.12.2025
Edited on:
03-Dec-2025 10:36
Edited by:
c.i.ordonez-de-garcia@iaea.org