Construction of the Point Blanche Prison and House of Detention in Sint Maarten, Dutch Caribbean

New clarification added: UNOPS CLARIFICATION No.2:This clarification notice serves as a reminder to all bidders. The deadline for submitting your complete offers is Monday, June 30th, 2025 until 15:00 hrs (Sint Maarten time). Given the rapidly approaching deadline, we strongly urge all bidders to take immediate action to ensure timely submission. We highly recommend initiating the upload process well in advance of the deadline, to mitigate any potential last-minute technical issues or unforeseen circumstances.To facilitate a smooth and efficient submission process, please note that the eSourcing platform allows for incremental document uploads. You are not required to wait until all documentation is finalized before commencing the upload. As soon as a document is ready, please upload it to the platform. This proactive approach will significantly reduce the risk of encountering delays closer to the deadline.We understand that compiling a comprehensive offer requires time and effort. However, delaying the upload process until the final hours significantly increases the risk of technical difficulties or unexpected delays that could jeopardize your final submission. We encourage you to prioritize the upload process and begin as soon as possible.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.312:Please Confirm if it is possible to give an extention of 30 days for the deadline to submitt the offer.ANSWER No.312:The deadline for submissions remains June 30, 2025, until 3:00 p.m. (Sint Maarten time).

New clarification added: QUESTION No.311:It has been noted that furniture has been removed from cells and areas where interns carry out activities outside their cells. Please confirm that UNOPS will provide the Contractor with mechanical guides for embedded fastening, preparation, or passage elements for electromechanical or special installations with sufficient detail and advance notice so that the “Contractor” can make the necessary preparations or passages in the structural elements.ANSWER No.311:Regarding embedded fastening and preparation for installations, UNOPS will ensure that the Contractor receives the necessary information and details in advance to facilitate required preparations in the structural elements.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.307:Prior to the contract award, which procedure will be applied: pre-award negotiation or BAFO (best and final offer)?ANSWER No.307:Please refer to UNOPS Procurement Manual Rev. 7, sections 8.8.7 and 8.9. After an RFP, UNOPS typically avoids negotiations. However, negotiations with the highest-scoring bidder may be justified if "due cause" exists, such as a constrained budget, not required additional services, quantity discounts, or an unreasonable price. A BAFO (Best and Final Offer) is an optional step in RFPs when multiple proposals receive identical scores. In such case, eligible bidders can only modify their price, unlike negotiations, which can involve clarifying technical offers and adjusting financial proposals.QUESTION No.308:In document of 3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_Returnable Schedules-Schedule 0.4 Capacity and Experience:1). Minimum of 15 years of experience as General Contractor in the construction of vertical infrastructure projects / Minimum of 8 turnkey projects completed in the last 15 years as General Contractor;As this project to be constructed by the construction contractor only involves procurement and construction, while the engineering part is already done in the first phase by the international consulting firm CSI Ingenieros S.A.. So in this form, for the first requirement Turnkey project? : yes/no, we think it is NOT APPLICABLE as this project is only PC but not EPC, so the requirement for EPC we think is not  necessary. Please kindly clarify on this aspect.ANSWER No.308:Please consult Amendment No. 4. The turnkey requirement within Qualification Criterion No. 3 has been modified; review the updated criterion for full details.QUESTION No.309:We kindly request that you tell us which software was used to create the prison model.ANSWER No.309:Please refer to the project prison model and its associated files.QUESTION No.310:We kindly request UNOPS to confirm whether the installation of the furniture removed in Amendment No. 03 is within the scope of this project. If so, please indicate the location where the furniture will be delivered to us so that we can consider the cost of transporting it to the work siteANSWER No.310:This contract does not cover the installation of the furniture removed in Amendment No. 03.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.295:Dear Procurement Officer, in the structural drawing numbered SXM-MBU-ST-DRA-438_Main Building Level 1 Plan View Reinforcement +163 3_4, the additional reinforcement bars for the floor slab lack length markings (this issue exists in other floor levels as well). Some sections only show schematic reinforcement bars without specifying their parameters. Could you kindly confirm in this aspect?ANSWER No.295:Amendment No. 4 now includes reinforcing bar length markings and updated drawings.QUESTION No.296:Dear Procurement Officer, we only found one item for demolition work in BOQ, that is "Demolition-Demolition structure type 1: 5500 m2. " Please confirm whether this is the total quantity for all demolition work ?ANSWER No.296:In this Lump Sum contract, the Bill of Quantities (BOQ) is indicative, and the contractor is responsible for assessing and verifying all quantities based on the provided drawings and specifications, which take precedence.Therefore, we advise you to base your lump sum on your own quantity take-off and cost assessment of the full scope of works. The Contractor will not be entitled to additional payment for quantity variations unless they arise from a formal Variation to the contract.The current prison plan has been communicated in the folder: 1. Basic information and engineering studies.QUESTION No.297:Reference:Contract Details 1.1 y 11.10Question: Would it be possible to reduce the Latent Defects period to twelve (12) months?ANSWER No.297:The Defects Notification Period (DNP) will remain 12 months and the Latent Defect Period in 5 years.QUESTION No.298:In Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment 3 -3.10 Insurance Requirements (Page 101 of 102), in the Any other insurances (The Contractor must procure Workers’ compensation insurance in addition to existing social security requirements. Covers medical expenses, lost wages, and other benefits for employees injured on the job site.) , it seems that it is same like Workers’ compensation insurance in this section. Please kindly confirm on this aspect whether it is duplicate for Workers’ compensation insurance.ANSWER No.298:Please refer to Amendment No. 4, which updates the insurance names in Schedule 3.10 (Insurance Requirements)QUESTION No.299:One (1) point will be given for each position occupied by a woman, with a maximum of three (3) points awarded. Please kindly confirm that these positions are not limited to the five key personnel requested and that points will be awarded for women in other positions of the  company's organization structure.ANSWER No.299:This criterion applies exclusively to director and management positions within the Organizational Structure, including the Contractor’s Representative from the Key Personnel.QUESTION No.300:Concerning the requirement for key personnel-Contractor’s Representative [Contractor’s Project Manager]-Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering,Construction Engineering, Architecture or related field, with a Master Degree or Certification in Project Management and/or Business Administration;Can you confirm whether both bachelor's degree and master degree are madatory? Or, Master degree is for those who are not in majors of civil engineering, architecture but in other related fields? Or, if bachelor's degree alone, combined with relevant experience and a certain amount of years of experience would be acceptable?ANSWER No.300:A bachelor's degree in Civil Engineering, Construction Engineering, Architecture, or a related field is mandatory. Additionally, the Contractor's Project Manager must hold a Master's Degree or certification in Project Management and/or Business Administration.QUESTION No.301:Could you kindly clarify what conditions shall be met before the contract effective date commences? Also, is there any contract commencement order issued before the contractor can officially start the project execution and under which circumstances?ANSWER No.301:For the effective date, please refer to Sub-Clause 1.1 of the General Conditions of Contract and to Section III: Conditions of Contract / Instrument of Agreement.The commencement of works is detailed in Sub-Clause 8.1 of the General Conditions of Contract.QUESTION No.302:Schedule-0.3 Joint Venture Partner Information-This schedule states it should only be returned for Joint Ventures;however,the form is listed as "Mandatory"through the submission checklist website.Please confirm we must submit Schedule 0.3 with "NA"to comply with document checkist submission requirements.ANSWER No.302:Yes, if the bidder is not a Consortium or Joint Venture, you can indicate 'N/A' (Not Applicable).QUESTION No.303:Schedule-0.6 Statement of Availability:  I further declare that I am able and willing to work for the period(s) foreseen for the position for which my CV has been included in the event that this proposal is successful, namely:From [start of period 1] To [end of period 1], From [start of period 2] To [end of period 2],  From [etc.] To [etc.]We don't understand what should we insert here as we don't even know when will the contract strat. Also, why there are serval periods here? Does it mean the key personel don't need to be on-site for the whole construction period and they should stay/be onsite in different periods instead? Please kindly clarify on this aspect.ANSWER No.303:These periods must align with your proposed program and the dedicated time of each key personnel, as outlined in Schedule 3.8 (Key Personnel Requirements).QUESTION No.304:Please clarify whether the Retention Money: 3% of Accepted Contract Amount or Contract Price as relevant could be replaced by the same amount of retention money bank guarantee instead.ANSWER No.304:No, the requirement is maintained.QUESTION No.305:Is there any limitation on the number of the companies that can pass the technical proposal (i.e. at least achieve 70 points of the technical evaluation)?ANSWER No.305:Only proposals that meet or exceed the minimum threshold indicated in the “Technical Criteria” table shall be considered substantially compliant.QUESTION No.306:We request for the 2nd pre-bid meeting minutes when it is ready to share.ANSWER No.306:Please refer to the minutes from the second pre-bid meeting on the Revisions tab.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.290:Reference: Cláusula 14 Contract Price and Payment Sub-Cláusula 14.6 Issue of Interim Payment Certificate (a)Question: In order to avoid unjustified delays in payments and to provide better operational and financial certainty to the Contractor:Would it be possible to reduce the time for the issuance of the Interim Payment Certificate (IPC) by the Engineer from twenty-eight (28) to fifteen (15) days, counted from the receipt of the Statement and its supporting documents, and to establish that, if the IPC is not issued within this period, it shall be deemed as approved by the Engineer?ANSWER No.290:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.291:Reference: Clause 5 Subcontracting Sub-Clause 5.1 Subcontractors (b) Question: To avoid delays in the execution of the Works:Would it be possible to establish an exception to the provision set out in Sub-Clause 5.1(b), so the prior approval from the Engineer is not required for contracts entered with Subcontractors whose value is below USD $500,000.00?ANSWER No.291:Sub-Clause 5.1 (b) remains unchanged.QUESTION No.292:Reference: Effective DateQuestion: Please confirm how much time we will have between notification of the award and signing of the ContractANSWER No.292:Contract signing is estimated to occur within 15 to 30 days following results notification.QUESTION No.293:As for foreign companies, the process for rigistering local company/business license, opening local bank account, obtaining work permits&residency permits can take at least 6 months based on our investigation.However, there is only one month for mobilization. Additionally, Sint Maarten's law prohibits applicants from residing  or working on the island while their permits are being processed. Could Client clarify whether the Contractor can get exemption from relevant department to work while they are waiting these permits? Or, there are other alternative solutionsANSWER No.293:The registration in the Country is an obligation of the contractor once awarded.It is our understanding that the process should take between 4 and 6 weeks, even if the practice shows that sometime it lasts longer.Nonetheless, the Contractor will count with the suppport of UNOPS. As part of that, UNOPS has already reached out the Authority requesting "fast track" for the registration and it is confident that a practical solution will be found not to obstruct the contactor getting enabled to operate in the country.The Contractor shall set up is working program and schedule based on the assumption that the permit will be released within a reasonable time.During the award process, the parties will get into the detail and, provided that the Contractor will be able to fully comply with the local requirements to obtain the registration, if needed an extension might be granted.QUESTION No.294:Could UNOPS confirm whether the one-month mobilization is strictly enforced meaning that all contractual obligations including the full presence of key personnel must begin immediately upon contract effectiveness?ANSWER No.294:The contractor is responsible for developing the detailed work program, provided it adheres to the limitations of the two phases.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.282:Reference: Engineering ScopeClarification: It is requested to confirm that the DETAIL ENGINEERING / ENGINEERING FOR CONSTRUCTION will be provided by the client and will include the volumes and specifications approved for the construction for the purchase of Materials and Equipment and Execution of the Work.We consider that upon receipt of the complete Detailed Engineering by the client, we will only perform a cross check and issue technical consultations where necessary.ANSWER No.282:IFC (Issued for Construction) drawings will be provided by the Employer after contract award. These drawings will include the approved specifications required for execution of the works. Upon receipt, you are expected to review the drawings.QUESTION No.283:Reference: Clause 20. Claims Sub-Clause 20.3 Contractor's Claims (j) Question: Considering the scenarios under which the Contractor is entitled to submit a claim—and given that such claims should include recognition of Profit and indirect costs:Would it be possible to that the Contractor's Claims under Sub-Clause 20.3(j) to expressly include Cost Plus Profit and indirect costs as potential outcomes of a Contractor’s Claim, where applicable in accordance with other provisions of the Contract?ANSWER No.283:Sub-Clause 20.3 (j) remains unchanged.QUESTION No.284:Reference: Clause 16 Suspension and Termination by Contractor Sub-Clause 16.1 Contractor's Entitlement to Suspend Work Question: Considering that there are various essential obligations of the Employer whose non-compliance may significantly affect the progress of the Works, such as:1. Payments of any amounts under the Contract,2. The unrestricted access to the Site,3. Delivery of permits, engineering, and procurement works under its responsibility,4. Expedited review and issuance of Interim Payment Certificates (IPCs) and Variations,5. Warrants the non-interference by other contractors, and6. Compliance with any other material obligation under the Contract,Would it be possible to expressly include that, without prejudice to any other rights the Contractor may have under the Contract, the Employer’s failure to comply with any of these obligations shall entitle the Contractor to suspend the Works pursuant to Clause 16 [Suspension and Termination by Contractor] and that in the event of a suspension, such suspension shall be treated as a Variation under Clause 13.1 [Right to Vary], granting the Contractor the right to a Time Extension and payment of direct costs, indirect costs and Cost Plus Profit?ANSWER No.284:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.285:Reference: Clause 16 Suspension and Termination by the Contractor Sub-Clause 16.1 Contractor's Entitlement to Suspend Work Question: Given that Sub-Clause 15.2 [Termination by Employer] (b) allows the Employer to terminate the Contract if the Contractor fails to remedy a default identified in the notice of intention to terminate within a period of fourteen (14) days, and considering that certain breaches may require more time for full remediation:Would it be possible to establish that the Employer or the Engineer shall provide the Contractor, by written notice, with a reasonable cure period to remedy the breach?; and Would it be possible to amend the wording of Sub-Clause 15.2(b) so that termination shall not proceed if the Contractor has reasonably commenced the remediation of the default within the fourteen (14) days from the notice of intention, even if such remediation has not yet been completed?ANSWER No.285:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.286:Reference: Clause 15 Termination by Employer Sub-Clause 15.4 Payment after Termination by Employer Question: Considerando que la Sub-Cláusula 15.4(b) establece que, tras la terminación anticipada del Contrato por parte del Employer, el Contratista deberá pagar diversas pérdidas y daños:Would it be possible to clarify that the losses and damages referred in the Contract are limited to direct and reasonable damages actually incurred by the Employer, and shall in no case include indirect, consequential, or special damages, nor loss of profit, reputation, opportunity, or business interruption?ANSWER No.286:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.287:Reference: Clause 17 Risk and Responsibility Sub-Clause 17.5 Liabilities and Indemnities Question: Would it be possible to include a liability cap for both Parties (except in the cases excluded under Sub-Clause 17.5(d)) equivalent to fifty percent (50%) of the total Contract value?ANSWER No.287:Sub-Clause 17.5 remains unchanged.QUESTION No.288:Reference: Clause 1 General Provisions  Sub-Clause 1.1 Definitions "Employer's Documents"Question: Considering that the prompt delivery of the Employer’s Documents is essential for the proper execution of the Procurement, Engineering, and Construction works:Would it be possible to expressly establish that all Employer’s Documents must be delivered to the Contractor no later than the Effective Date, except for those which, due to their nature or technical sequence, are scheduled for delivery at a later date as set out in the approved execution schedule?ANSWER No.288:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.289:Reference: Cláusula 14 Contract Price and Payment Sub-Cláusula 14.7 Payment (a) and (c)Question: Considering the need to maintain adequate cash flow for the continuous and efficient execution of the Works:Would it be possible to reduce the payment period from thirty (30) to fifteen (15) days for the Employer to make payments to the Contractor with respect to:The amount recognized in each Interim Payment Certificate (IPC),The amount recognized in the Final Payment Certificate, andThe advance payment, following the issuance of the Advance Payment Certificate?ANSWER No.289:Kindly refer to Schedule 3.4, "Valuation and Payment," Sub-clauses 14.1 and 14.6 for the relevant provisions.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.270:Floor type F01 is defined as raised access floor in the legend in plan sheets. Despite that, there is no raised floor defined in drawings nor the BoQ. We kindly ask for clarification for the floor type for F01.ANSWER No.270:Floor finish type F01 is specified for Rooms 302 (IT Server) and 303 (Control Room).QUESTION No.271:We could not see following rooms in drawings despite they have been mentioned in room schedules. We kindly ask for locations of the rooms mentioned.W112, W090, W522 and W1027.ANSWER No.271:In case of discrepancies, please refer to the priority of documents as outlined in General Conditions of Contract – Clause 1.5QUESTION No.272:The height of the fence for terrace contact visit (room 205) is defined as 2.70 m in the sheet SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-503 despite it is defined as 2.90 m in the section 1/450. The linetype and hatch of the fence is as same as CMU walls in the sheet SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-503 and section 1/450. We kindly ask for clarification if it is a fence. If so, please clarify the fence height.ANSWER No.272:The fence height is 2.90 meters as indicated on the SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-503QUESTION No.273:The corridor between the room 201 and 246 in the main building is tagged as 249 in the door control plans (ref SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-910) and overall plans (ref SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-202) but there is no room tag in the main building plans (ref SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-503). We kindly ask for the confirmation of the room number with ceiling, wall, floor, base information.ANSWER No.273:Room 249 (“Visits Exit”) is confirmed as a room with G01 (acoustic removable ceiling), P01 (latex paint at walls), and C01 (finished concrete floor).QUESTION No.274:Regarding to the Thermal Conditioning Systems Duct Insulation; Tenderer could not find any specification on "DESCRIPTIVE REPORT - SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-701", "CALCULATION REPORT -  SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-701", "TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-703", or any relevant drawings. Thus, the Tenderer understanding is that the Thermal Conditioning Systems Ducts will be non-insulated. Please confirm.ANSWER No.274:The assumption is correct. Refer to DESCRIPTIVE REPORT - SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-701", "CALCULATION REPORT - SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-701", "TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-703QUESTION No.275:Reference: Construction Perimeter Fence H= 5.00 mClarification: In drawing SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-001 is indicated the construction of two Security Perimeter Items (Concrete Security Wall 5.00 m and Perimeter Fence 5.00 m) at stage 0.1, please clarify to which item refer in the note "CONSTRUCTION OF SECURITY PERIMETER FOR NEW PRISON"  (concrete wall or Perimeter fence) or is refer to the both items construction. If refer 1 item please indicate in which stage we have to constuct each one.ANSWER No.275:We confirm that in Stage 0.1, the note "CONSTRUCTION OF SECURITY PERIMETER FOR NEW PRISON" refers to the construction of both the 5.00 m Concrete Security Wall and the 5.00 m Perimeter Fence as indicated in drawing SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-001. Both items are to be constructed in this stage.QUESTION No.276:In the document "SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 - ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTIVE REPORT", it has been mentioned that the main swichboard panel located in Electrical Room receives on connection from the local power company substation (other than one from the Generator and one from the reneweable energy system).Please provide exact location of tie-in point from the local power company substation, where after the Contractor will be responsible for.ANSWER No.276:Please refer to drawing SXM-ZZZ-EL-DRA-404 – Layout with Main Channels – Power & DataQUESTION No.277:The window type A53 is missing in window schedule despite it is being shown in the main building drawings (plans and elevations). We kindly ask for the details of the window mentioned.ANSWER No.277:In case of discrepancies, please refer to the priority of documents as outlined in General Conditions of Contract – Clause 1.5QUESTION No.278:Cable Tray thickness requirements have not been mentioned neither on the specifications nor on the drawings.Kindly provide the cable tray thicknesses.ANSWER No.278:The offered cable tray thickness is based on standard industry practice, as no specific requirement is stated in the specifications or drawings.QUESTION No.279:On the drawings "SXM-MBU-TC-DRA-409" and "SXM-MBU-TC-DRA-405", there is a FCU which does not have notation/ID number, which is located on the right side of the FCU-245. Please provide ID number.ANSWER No.279:The FCU without the notation/ID number corresponds to "FCU-204" assigned to "204 Visitor Detaining Room". The Unit capacity can be found on page 11 of "SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-703_Technical Specifications". Please refer to documents  "SXM-MBU-TC-DRA-405" - rev07 and "SXM-MBU-TC-DRA-409".QUESTION No.280:For CC type FCU, theres no implementation that the condansate pump will be factory mounted;  but HC and CD types must have factory mounted condensate pumps. Kindly advise.ANSWER No.280:It is advised that the condensate pumps are factory-mounted as well. Please refer to document "SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-703_Technical Specifications".QUESTION No.281:Noise level specification for CC and CD types of FCU has not specified. Kindly provide.ANSWER No.281:Please refer to document "SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-703_Technical Specifications". 

New amendment added #4: Refer to Amendment No. 4 under the Documents tab for further information.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.261:Although the existing internal perimeter wall height is stated as 4 meters in '2_ITB-2024-54622_Section_II_III_IV_V, page 52 of 116, paragraph 2', it is stated as 4.5 meters in 'SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-701_Descriptive report, page 4 & 5 of 11'. Confirm which height is correct.ANSWER No.261:Refer per SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-701 for the wall height.QUESTION No.262:Please indicate the technical requirements/specifications of the elevator (load capacity, speed, etc.).ANSWER No.262:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702_Technical Specification, paragraph 3.20 for technical specifications. The lift described in drawings, (see SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-608-LIFT) indicates dimensions that fulfill the requirement of fitting a strecher, per ISO 8100-32: 2020 guidelines.QUESTION No.263:Reference: Clause 13 Variations and Adjustments Sub-Clause 13.6 Adjustments for Changes in LawsQuestion: A Change in Law is an external and unforeseeable circumstance beyond the Contractor’s control that may have a significant economic impact on the Contract—for example, changes in applicable legislation, permits, taxes, tariffs, or in general, fiscal or importation conditions, including the loss of previously available tax benefits or exemptions. Therefore:Would it be possible to clarify that, in the event of a Change in Law and pursuant to Sub-Clause 13.6(b), the Contractor shall be entitled to an extension of time and reimbursement of costs, either through a Contractor’s Claim or a Variation, covering both direct and reasonably incurred indirect costs, as well as the corresponding Cost Plus Profit?ANSWER No.263:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.264:Reference: Clause The Contractor Sub-Clause 4.16 Contractor's Equipment; Clause 8 Commencement, Delays and Suspension Sub-Clause 8.8 Suspension by Employer and Clause 15 Termination by Employer Sub-Clause 15.2 Termination by EmployerQuestion: Considering that, the retention of Materials, Plant, or Contractor’s Equipment may arise from causes not attributable to the Contractor:Would it be possible to include in the Contract that the Employer or the Engineer shall not, under any circumstances, retain, prevent the removal of, or make use of the Contractor’s Equipment?ANSWER No.264:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.265:Reference: Clause 8 Commencement, Delays and Suspension Sub-Clause 8.6 Rate of Progress (c)Question: Given that Clause 8.6(c) allows the Engineer to instruct an acceleration of the rate of progress as an alternative to granting an EOT, treating it as a Variation under Sub-Clause 13.3 [Variation Procedure]:Would it be possible to clarify that, provided the acceleration order does not result from a default attributable to the Contractor, the Contractor shall be entitled to a Variation that includes not only direct costs, but also the reasonably incurred indirect costs and the corresponding Cost Plus Profit?ANSWER No.265:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.266:Reference: Clause 4 The Contractor Sub-Clause 4.22 Archaeological and Geological FindingsQuestion: Considering that Sub-Clause 4.22 address that the Contractor shall be entitled to EOT and Cost under the Variation procedure, but it does not expressly mention the recognition of indirect costs or Cost Plus Profit:Would it be possible to clarify that in a case of  Archaeological and Geological Findings the corresponding Variation shall also include the reasonably incurred indirect costs and the associated Cost Plus Profit, and the EOT may also be granted through a Variation Procedure upon the Contractor’s request?ANSWER No.266:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.267:Reference: Clause 6 Staff and Labour Sub-Clause 6.5 Working Hours (b)Question: Given that Sub-Clause 6.5(b) allows the Employer to claim from the Contractor the costs of additional supervision in the event that work is carried out outside normal working hours:Would it be possible to establish that such costs shall not be reimbursable to the Employer, and the Employer shall be required to notify the Contractor in order to ensure proper coordination for such supervision?ANSWER No.267:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.268:Reference: Clause 5 Subcontracting Sub-Clause 5.1 Subcontractors (h) and Sub-Clause 5.5 Evidence of Payments to Nominated Subcontractors (a)Question: With respect to Sub-Clauses 5.1(h) and 5.5(a), and considering that the Contractor is responsible for the management and coordination of the Nominated Subcontractors, but without assuming contractual obligations beyond those set out in the Contract:Would it be possible to remove the requirement for Nominated Subcontractors to provide collateral guarantees to the Employer?Additionally:It be possible the reasonable evicence required by the Engineer regarding that the Nominated Subcontractor has recieved all amounts due, that evidence only apply to the Final Payment Certificate? ANSWER No.268:UNOPS considers that the contract's general conditions contain provisions addressing all eventualities. Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.269:Reference: Clause 11 Defects Liability Sub-Clause 11.4 Failure to Remedy Defects (b) Clause 14 Contractors Price and Payment Sub-Clause 14.9 Release of Retention Money (a) (b) (c) and (d) and Clause 20 Claims Sub-Clause 20.2 Employers ClaimsQuestion: Considering that the Contract already provides a Performance Security as a guarantee of performance, as well as the Employer’s right to submit Claims:Would it be possible to eliminate any provision allowing the Engineer or the Employer to withhold payments in any case?ANSWER No.269:The general conditions remain unchanged 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.251:Since this facility includes many sensitive equipment, is there a need for an AVR on the facility's power supply line? What is the stability of the grid voltage in the region?ANSWER No.251:Follow the requirements as specified in the relevant documentation - Folder "8. Electrical".QUESTION No.252:LPCP-Lighting and Power Control Panel will be located at Observation Point (Main Building Level-0 Room# 031) per “SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 - ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTIVE REPORT” Panel is not shown in the “SXM-MBU-EL-DRA-455-MAIN BUILDING - LEVEL 0 & 1 - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT” detail#4 “ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT - MAIN BUILDING - LEVEL 0 - ROOM 031” The panel location and sizes should be indicated in this detail. Also there is no cabling or control layout details for this panel and control system.ANSWER No.252:Please refer toSXM-W01-EL-DRA-446SXM-W01-EL-DRA-447SXM-W01-EL-DRA-448SXM-W01-EL-DRA-449SXM-W01-EL-DRA-450SXM-W01-EL-DRA-451SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701SXM-ZZZ-EL-DRA-901 to 906QUESTION No.253:In single-line diagrams (example: “SXM-ZZZ-EL-DRA-908_Single Line Diagram_LVMP8”) showing the details of the power panels, both 125V and 220V 2-pole outlets are depicted according to the legend. For this facility, single-phase 125V is used, but for the 220V 2-pole outlets, will two phases such as RS, ST, or TR be used?ANSWER No.253:Yes, 220V 2-pole outlets use two phases (e.g., RS, ST, TR) and ground. Phase assignments are shown directly above the outlet description on the SLD.QUESTION No.254:On the drawing (cut not limited to) SXM-W01-SA-DRA-408; there are indicated "Element References", however on the layout there are different symbol references which haven't been identified. Please confirm there are only 2 types of Lavatories as "accessible" and "regular" types.ASNWER No.254:It is confirmedQUESTION No.255:On the drawing "SXM-MBU-TC-DRA-409", connection radius detail is missing for FCU-245. Please provide.ANSWER No.255:Refer to "SXM-ZZZ-TC-MOD-000" model.QUESTION No.256:On the descriptive report SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-701, and on the relevant drawings; connection scheme for FCU's are not available on the projects. Technical Spesifications document only indicates that all FCUs will have 2 way motorized valves. Theres no info about ball valves, strainers or by-pass lines. Please advise.ANSWER No.256:Refer to page 419 from the "SXM-ZZZ-TC-REP-702_Calculation report".QUESTION No.257:Reference: Clause 8 Commencement, Delays and Suspension Question:Considering that suspensions delay the execution of the Works and lead to increased costs:Would it be possible for all suspension cases established in the Contract, including prolonged suspensions, to be entitled to compensation covering Costs, indirect costs, and Cost Plus Profit, and that such cases would be treated as a Variation?ANSWER No.257:Please refer to sub-clause 20.3 Contractor´s Claims.QUESTION No.258:Reference: Clausula 3 The Engineer Sub-Clause 3.3 Engineer’s Instructions (c)Question:While verbal instructions may be necessary in emergency situations, we consider that they should be confirmed in writing to avoid future claims from either Party. In this regard: Would it be possible to establish that, in cases where Works must be carried out pursuant to an emergency instruction issued by the Engineer, such instruction shall be formalized in writing within two (2) days from its issuance, and shall be treated as a Variation for all purposes under the Contract?ANSWER No.258:Refer to Sub-Clause 3.3 (d) and 13.3QUESTION No.259:Reference: Clause 2 Claims Sub-Clause 20.2 Employer's ClaimsQuestion: We consider that if the Contractor is required to perform additional work or incur costs as a result of an Employer’s Claim based on a circumstance not attributable to the Contractor, such compensation should include both direct and indirect costs as well as the Cost Plus Profit. Otherwise, the Contractor would bear a financial burden for an issue not caused by its own default. That said:Would it be possible to establish under Clause 20 that, when it is determined that an Employer’s Claim was not caused by any fault or breach of the Contractor, and additional works or obligations must be performed or assumed as a result of such Claim, the Contractor shall be entitled to recover not only direct Costs, but also reasonably incurred indirect costs, the corresponding Cost Plus Profit, and a time extension?, and; Would it be possible to include a provision stating that the Employer shall not be entitled to enforce any deduction or set-off under an Employer’s Claim until the Parties have reached an agreement regarding the time and/or cost impacts of the underlying event or instruction?ANSWER No.259:Sub-Clause 20.2 remains unchanged.QUESTION No.260:Reference: Clause 13 Variations and Adjustments Sub-Clause 13.1 Right to VaryQuestion: Considering that allowing the Contractor to also initiate Variations ensures a more balanced mechanism, enabling the Contractor to respond proactively to unforeseen conditions or Employer-driven disruptions without resorting to the claims process:Would it be possible to amend Sub-Clause 13.1(a) to establish that Variations may also be initiated by the Contractor up until the issuance of the Taking-Over Certificate?ANSWER No.260:Sub-Clause 13.1 remain unchanged. The contractor may propose value engineering variations to the Engineer for consideration (sub-clause 13.2)

New clarification added: QUESTION No.246:We consider that Wastewater Treatment Plant "Equipments" 001 & "Equipment 002" indicated in "SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Bill of Quantities" correspond to "5.3.3.1. Primary Treatment" and "5.3.3.2. Secondary Treatment" indicated in the technical specification "SXM-ZZZ-SA-REP-703".Please confirm.ANSWER No.246:Please refer to:SXM-ZZZ-SA-DRA-301 (Wastewater Treatment Plant Profile – Civil Sanitary)SXM-ZZZ-SA-REP-701 (Descriptive Report – Civil Sanitary)All relevant points in SXM-ZZZ-SA-REP-703, paragraph 5.3 should also be considered.QUESTION No.247:Reference: UNOPS Minimum health and safety requirements for contractors 3.4 Language to communicate with the workforceClarification: In this clause, UNOPS states that The Contractor and Subcontractors shall ensure that all rules, instructions and signage relating to the work are communicated in a language or languages understood by the workforce. to the work are communicated in a language or languages understood by the workforce.As we have an 80% Spanish-speaking workforce, we request clarification from UNOPS as to whether we will be able to use this language as the primary language for our internal communications.ASNWER No.247:While English remains the official language for all formal communications as per Sub-clause 1.4 (Language) of the General Conditions of Contract, it's crucial to also comply with the UNOPS Minimum Health and Safety Requirements for Contractors. To ensure the safety of all personnel, the Contractor and Subcontractors must ensure that all rules, instructions, and signage pertaining to the work are communicated in language(s) understood by the workforce. This includes, but is not limited to, English, Spanish, and any other relevant languages spoken by the workers on site.QUESTION No.248:The access of rooms 131 & 126 in the main building is different in main building plans (ref sheet SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-501) and door control drawings (ref sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-909) Since the sheet sheet SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-501 is the most updated version, we follow the main building plans, yet we kindly ask for the clarification for the access scenario of the rooms mentioned.ANSWER No.248:Access to rooms 131 and 126 follows the main building plans (SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-501). Entry is via search rooms (electro-mechanical locks controlled from the Control Room) and manually operated wide doors for deliveries, per Prison Management requirements.QUESTION No.249:We see that both the tag C02 and M13 is being used for the partition between the room 126 (workshop 6) and the open circulation area in the main building. Also, the tag C02 is being used between the open balcony in front of the room 112 and the open circulation area in the main building despite it is drawn as railing. We assume that C02 is a typo for both conditions, please confirm.ANSWER No.249:For C02 refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900.For M13 refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-904QUESTION No.250:For the pavements, in the technical specification a correlation between flexural strength and compressive strength is mentioned. On the calculation report C35/45 concrete is written. Is there any flexural strength requirement and also will be testing required on field for flexural strength?ASNWER No.250:For further details, please refer to the following documents:SXM-ZZZ-EW-REP-701SXM-ZZZ-EW-REP-702SXM-ZZZ-EW-REP-703

New clarification added: QUESTION No.236:The hatch types defined in the legend does not match with the hatches on the plan in the sheet SXM-ZZZ-LA-DRA-101 . Please clarify lawn and shrubs areas.ANSWER No.236:The lawn area is indicated in solid green on the floor plan and can be identified on all exterior spaces between the containment fence / buildings limits. The area designated for small shrubs and undergrowth is indicated with a diagonal hatch, and is located in between the security perimeter wall and the containment fence/building boundary.QUESTION No.237:5 meters temporary fence has been specified for the temporary enclosures(SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-001). Does this fence has the same specifications with the permanent fence in drawing SXM-ZZZ-ST-DRA-502? Also does it apply to the temporary fences in Stage 2?ANSWER No.237:Yes, it is. It will be used as a secondary security perimeter during the construction phase.QUESTION No.238:Reference: SignalsClarification: There are no architectural signage plans, please indicate the criteria for quoting and how to include these concepts, if is the case.ANSWER No.238:There are no drawings for signage. Quote based on standard practice and contract scope.QUESTION No.239:Reference: Termite treatmentClarification: In the Design Planning Manual for Buildings Technical framework for minimum requirements for infrastructure design, C2-PR 9 Termite treatment, indicates Termite treatment MUST be specified in any zone that is infested with termites, please confirm that this consideration is applicable to the project.ANSWER No.239:In compliance with C2-PR 9 of the Design Planning Manual for Buildings, termite treatment will be implemented if the presence of termites is identified during site works.QUESTION No.240:Reference: Electronic mock-upIn the electronic model provided by UNOPS there is a corridor in the lower part of the main building. Looking in all the documentation provided by UNOPS we did not find the document where we indicate the specifications of this area, we kindly request the document that specifies the characteristics of this areaANSWER No.240:Refer to SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-500.QUESTION No.241:Reference: Clarify texture concrete specificationClarification: Drawing SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900-WALL ASSEMBLIES specifies a 0.03 TEXTURE CONCRETE finish. For instance, wall C02 shows a 0.03" textured concrete finish over 0.20" reinforced concrete. Similarly, C04 has a 0.03" textured finish over 0.150" reinforced concrete. Please clarify if the 0.03" texture is a surface finish applied to the structural concrete wall composed of a cement-sand-gravel mix,  or if it's part of the concrete thickness (the texture is applied in a thickness of the concrete wall that does not affect the structural thickness), making the total thickness 0.23" for C02 and 0.21" for C04ANSWER No.241:The 0.03" texture is part of the concrete thickness, the texture is applied in a thickness of the concrete wall.Please refer to ¨SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702_Technical Specification, 3.4.2.2 Fromwork, b) corrugated steel sheets.¨ FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.QUESTION No.242:We kindly ask for the function of the area between ward 1 & 9 and GC's scope for the area mentioned.ANSWER No.242:This area facilitates inmate flow during Stage 1. In the completed project, it does not serve a specific operational function; however, a fence and door have been installed to enhance security and facilitate maintenance.QUESTION No.243:Staff parking, staff VIP parking and visitors parking area with the capacity of 60 cars are defined in the sheet SXM-ZZZ-EW-DRA-402 despite they are not included in any stage in the sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-001, architectural master plan - stages. We kindly ask for GC's scope for the parking areas mentioned. If it is to be in GC's scope, please provide staging information.ASNWER No.243:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-001, those parkings are in GC's scope and into de CONSTRUCTION STAGE 1 - 1.2 - CONSTRUCTION OF MAIN BUILDING & PARKING AREAS descriptionQUESTION No.244:We see that G02 is defined as ceiling of the room 024 in the main building, but we could not find any information related to G02. We kindly ask for the material and system details of G02.ANSWER No.244:Please refer to plan SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-500QUESTION No.245:Room tag for accessible shared cell bath is W117 in enlarged plans, ref sheet SXM-W01-AR-DRA-852. Despite that, we see that W120 is being used for the same room on the section 8/454 and the room schedule in the sheet SXM-W01-AR-DRA-454. We kindly ask for clarification of the room number for accessible shared cell baths.ANSWER No.245:W117 and W120 both refer to the same accessible shared cell bath.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.229:Reference: Clause 1 General Provisions Sub-Clause 1.1 Definitions "Cost" and "Cost Plus Profit"Question: Considering that situations which give rise to a recognition of Cost in favor of the Contractor should include both direct and indirect costs, and that such inclusion contributes to maintaining project continuity and prevents the Contractor from incurring economic losses that could compromise the execution of the WorksANSWER No.229:As Schedule 3.4 Valuation and Payment, sub-clause No. 1.1 indicates, cost plus profit is not applicable.QUESTION No.230:Reference: Clause 20 Claims Sub-Clause 20.3 Contractor's ClaimsQuestion:Considering that resolving all Contractor’s Claims through the Variation process in Clause 13 would simplify procedures, avoid delays, and reduce uncertainty: Could it be possible for all Contractor’s Claims to be resolved directly through the Variation process set forth in Clause 13 [Variations and Adjustments]?ANSWER No.230:Claims submitted by the contractor shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of sub-clause 20.3 of the contract.QUESTION No.231:Reference: Clause 13 Variations and AsjustmentsQuestion:Considering that any delays or errors in the delivery of Employer’s Documents can significantly impact the Contractor’s ability to plan, procure, and execute the Works as scheduled:Would it be possible to establish that any delay in the delivery or error in the Employer’s Documents be treated as a Variation, with recognition of the corresponding Costs (both direct and indirect), Profit, and a potential EOT, where applicable.ANSWER No.231:Please refer to sub-clause 20.3 Contractor´s Claims.QUESTION No.232:Reference: Clause 4. The Contractor Sub-Clause 4.2 Performance Security (a) and (b)Question: Please confirm that the Performance Security may be provided by a Bond instrument issued by an Insurance Company or a Surety Company?ANSWER No.232:Refer to Schedule 1.1 "Details Provided by the Employer", sub-clause 4.2, which clearly states that permitted guarantors for performance cecurity must be a bank approved by the Employer. UNOPS will only accept Guarantees from Banks with a minimum Long Term Credit Rating of BBB- with Standard and Poor’s, a minimum Long Term Credit Rating of Baa3 with Moody Investor Services, or a minimum Long Term Credit Rating of BBB- with Fitch Ratings. Any Bank Guarantee issued by a financial institution with a credit rating below the outlined credit ratings will require prior validation from UNOPS.QUESTION No.233:Reference: Clause 13 Variations and Adjustments Sub-Clause 13.3 Variation Procedure (c)Question:In order to avoid delays that may affect the execution of the Works and to mitigate the risk of additional Costs arising from a Variation:Would it be possible to establish a maximum period of seven (7) days from receipt of the Contractor’s variation proposal for the Engineer to issue approval, rejection, or comments?ANSWER No.233:Sub-Clause 13.3, "Variations Procedure", remains unchanged.QUESTION No.234:Reference: Clause 13 Variations and Adjustments Sub-Clause 13.3 Variation ProcedureQuestion:In order to avoid delays that may affect the execution of the Works and to mitigate the risk of additional Costs arising from a Variation:Would it be possible to establish that, if the Parties do not reach an agreement within seven (7) days from the date the Engineer received the Contractor’s variation proposal, the Contractor shall be entitled to proceed with the Variation based on the terms and amounts set out in such proposal, and the Employer shall recognize the proposed EOT?ANSWER No.234:Sub-Clause 13.3, "Variations Procedure", remains unchanged.QUESTION No.235:Reference: Clause 3 The Engineer Sub-Clause 3.3 Engineer’s Instructions (e)Question:Considering that allowing the Contractor to submit any Engineer’s Instruction to the Variation Procedure avoids disputes, and fairly accounts for time and cost impacts, including indirect costs and profit: Could the Contractor subject any Engineer’s Instruction to the Variation Procedure?ANSWER No.235:Refer to Sub-Clause 3.3 (d) and 13.3

New clarification added: QUESTION No.222:Reference: UNOPS Minimum health and safety requirements for contractorsClarification: HSE compliance in the project may be based on standards such as ASTM, ANSI, OSHA and NIOSH, ISO, among others, or will be subject exclusively to applicable European or local regulations.ANSWER No.222:The Contractor’s Health and Safety Plan must comply with both the UNOPS Minimum Health and Safety Requirements for Contractors (2021), including Section 7, and all applicable national legislation.QUESTION No.223:The Bidder's understanding is that the existing 340 kVA generator currently in use will not be utilized for the new Prison Building. Instead, 240 kVA generator will be procured and installed for the new Prison Building.However, no specification has been defined for the Generator in the tender documents. Kindly provide related specification for 240 kVA Generator.ANSWER No.223:The existing 340 kVA generator will be used for the new Prison Building. Please refer to Answer to Question No.129QUESTION No.224:Reference: ITB. Section IV: Schedule of Details4. Description of other surrounding sites and any related interface issues:e. Garbage collection & emergency vehiclesClarification: Please indicate the place where the rubble resulting from the construction and demolition works will be deposited.ANSWER No.224:The location for disposal of rubble resulting from construction and demolition works is already specified in the RFP. Please refer to 2_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_VQUESTION No.225:We browsed this procurement website and found that the selection for supervision consultant firm for "Supervision Of The Construction Of The Point Blanche Prison And House Of Detention In Sint Maarten, Dutch Caribbean" was just recently closed on May 26, 2025. The selction advertisement for supervision consultant firm was published on 24-Jan-2025 and the deadline for submiting the tender document was extended multiple times to the final submission deadline of May 26, 2025, which allows four months for supervision consultant firm to prepare their tender document.We think the bid-preparation period for construction general contractor should also be given the same or more time as the bid document for construction contractor is more complicated than the consultant firm (both technical and financial part). The clarification for consultant firm is 34 questions in total only, while currently the questions-clarification for this procurement process for construction contractor is already 167 as of May 29, 2025 and more to come. The required edits, changes and updates for all these almost 200 questions should be carefully considered and dealt with, which do take time.We respectfully request an extension of one month to the submission date to July 30th, 2025 to allow for preparing the bid responsively.  Your kind approval is highly appreciated by us bidders.ANSWER No.225:The deadline for submissions remains June 30, 2025, until 3:00 p.m. (Sint Maarten time).QUESTION No.226:We just saw this procurement opportunity and we are very interested in this project and want to bid for this project. However, we found this project is very complex and difficult to prepare the bidding document. Honestly speaking, it will take much more time to prepare the responsive bid. We hope 45 days more could be granted for extending bid submission deadline. Looking forward to your approval to our extension request!ANSWER No.226:The deadline for submissions remains June 30, 2025, until 3:00 p.m. (Sint Maarten time).QUESTION No.227:We kindly request to consider 1 (one) contract whose scope has been “Engineering, Procurement and Construction of a Federal Penitentiary Center” (including Operation and Maintenance) with a built area of 90,000 m² within an area of 70 Ha, a capacity to house 2,500 interns and 800 guards, complete hospital care area, prison industry areas, workshops and training classrooms, in the last 15 years; this contract should be considered as equivalent to the maximum experience requested by UNOPS in item 1. 2 of Section Part 1: Offeror’s capacity and expertise.ANSWER No.227:The technical criterion 1.2 is maintainedQUESTION No.228:Reference: Clause 1 General Provisions Sub-Clause 1.6 Assignment or Novation (c)Question: Subject to the possibility that the Contractor obtains funding, and considering that this could financially strengthen the execution of the Works without compromising contractual obligations or altering the relationship between the Parties:Could you please confirm that, pursuant to Sub-Clause 1.6(c), the Contractor is permitted to assign its payment rights to a subsidiary or affiliate company within the same corporate group or to a recognized financial institution?ANSWER No.228:Refer to sub-clause 1.6 (c): "The Contractor shall not be entitled, without the prior written consent of the Employer, to novate or assign to any third party its interest under the Contract or any right or benefit, arising under the Contract."

New clarification added: QUESTION No.221:We assume that the horticulture area is designed for horticulture training of inmates and GC to provide planting soil in the landscape scope. Please confirm.ANSWER No.221:Please refer to the project specifications for the intended use of the horticulture area and the requirements related to planting soil within the landscape scope.SXM-ZZZ-LA-REP-701SXM-ZZZ-LA-DRA-101SXM-ZZZ-LA-DRA-102SXM-ZZZ-LA-DRA-103

New clarification added: QUESTION No.216:In reference to Section I: Instructions to Offerors, Article 20 – Format and Signing of Proposals, it is stated that:"The proposal shall be typed and shall be signed in indelible ink by the offeror or a person or persons duly authorized to bind the offeror to the Contract."Could you kindly clarify whether a digitally verified signature (e.g., Adobe Sign) is acceptable for signing the proposal documents?ANSWER No.216:Yes, that is acceptable.QUESTION No.217:Reference: Temporary accommodationClarification: Due to the fact that there is no adequate accommodation on the island of Sint Marteen to receive the number of personnel that will be used during the execution of the project, we request you to indicate if the labor legislation would allow us to build temporary rooms for our personnel in a property (not located in the vicinity of the prison) rented for this purpose.ANSWER No.217:The contractor's mobilization strategy and site stablishment shall consider this element.QUESTION No.218:Reference: Project ScheduleClarification: We understand that the 2 Construction Stages indicated in the project scope can be carried out within 30 months after the mobilization of our personnel and that within our construction schedule we should indicate the activities to be carried out without the need to follow the order of the stages as long as we respect the restrictions defined by UNOPS between key activities.ANSWER No.218:Your understanding is correct: both construction stages must be completed within 30 months from mobilization. Activities in your construction schedule may be sequenced as you determine, provided all restrictions and dependencies between key activities defined in the project scope are strictly respected.QUESTION No.219:We would like to have Employer's advice/opinion on how to present BoQ, in case there is any item(s) within the Contractor's Scope of Works indicated in Drawings, Specification, Reports etc.; but not indicated in the "SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Bill of Quantities". The Bidder kindly suggests to present those items by inserting seperate line item with the new Level Numbering, and providing the related quantity on that new line item.ANSWER No.219:For this Lump Sum Contract, the Bill of Quantities is for reference, variation assessment, and tender comparison. All costs for the full scope of works are deemed included, regardless of BoQ itemization. Adding new BoQ line items is not recommended as it affects tender uniformity. Instead, price elements within existing BoQ items and explain any adjustments in your pricing notes or method statements.QUESTION No.220:Reference: SECTION IV: SCHEDULE OF DETAILSSCHEDULE 1: CONTRACT DETAILS1.1 Details Provided by the EmployerClarification: For an effective project planning, we ask to UNOPS to provide us with the project award date, advance payment date and the project start dateANSWER No.220:For the anticipated contract award date, please refer to the Expected Contract Award Date within the Tender Information/Tender Particulars. Please note that UNOPS reserves the right to award the contract at any time during the Proposal validity period.Regarding the commencement of works, refer to sub-clause 8.1 of the General Conditions of Contract. For advance payment, see sub-clause 14.2 (d) and (e). 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.211:Could you kindly confirm/clarify whether there is any area available for temporary facilities?ANSWER No.211:Please refer to Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V, Section 5. Description of approved location for the Contractor’s Site facilities including storage, accommodation, work areas and likewise and where Plant and Materials should be delivered and stored (in accordance with Sub-Clause 6.6 of the General Conditions and Sub-Clause 1.1 of the General Conditions respectively)QUESTION No.212:Could you kindly provide the rough distance between the designated Pond Island landfill and the construction site? ANSWER No.212:That information is not available, offerors shall make the appropriate estimations.QUESTION No.213:Please confirm that the performance security and  the advance payment security can be issued by a financial institution with a rating higher than BBB-ANSWER No.213:Yes. UNOPS will only accept Guarantees from Banks with a minimum Long Term Credit Rating of BBB- with Standard and Poor’s, a minimum Long Term Credit Rating of Baa3 with Moody Investor Services, or a minimum Long Term Credit Rating of BBB- with Fitch Ratings. Any Bank Guarantee issued by a financial institution with a credit rating below the outlined credit ratings will require prior validation from UNOPS.QUESTION No.214:In reference to the UNOPS eSourcing portal, Vendor Submission section, Documents Checklist, it mentions “Select a file to upload: Maximum file size - 20MB”.We understand that multiple files can be uploaded, as long as the size of each file does not exceed 20MB, please confirm.ANSWER No.214:Yes, you can upload multiple files, with each file not exceeding 20MB. Please ensure all documentation is well-organized.QUESTION No.215:Despite the written response to Question 27 stating:"The process of developing Issued for Construction (IFC) drawings falls under the Contractor's scope of work. Consequently, the Contractor's proposal must incorporate the costs and the time required to produce these IFC drawings,"it was verbally clarified by the Project Manager during the second pre-bid meeting that the IFC drawings will be issued by UNOPS after contract signature, and that the Contractor will only be responsible for the preparation of shop drawings. Could you kindly confirm which version is contractually valid, and clarify whether the responsibility for preparing IFC drawings lies with UNOPS or the Contractor?ANSWER No.215:This Answer also clarifies the Answer 27 as follows:This Construction Contract is a bid & build type.The Employer is responsible for the Permanent Works design; and he retains the fundamental design liability for the Permanent Works; the Contractor's design responsibility is limited (refSub-Clause 4.1(c)(ii)).The Employer is responsible for the "Issued for Construction (IFC)" drawings.The IFC will include changes (if any) between the current "for Bid" Dossier" and the IFC; the parties shall agree on these changes according to the variations procedure.Variations (if any) might result in addition or deduction (e.g. value engineering).Notwithstanding, the Contractor remain responsible to further develop the IFC into the "Final executive Drawings" (FED). He will develop and submit the shop drawings (and other technical docs might be needed) to enable the Employer approving the constructuion/execution pahse. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.207:Window A86 with a width of 1.79m by 2.85m height as indicated in the drawing SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-912-WINDOW SCHEDULE (ALUMINIUM), is no where to be found on the floorplan and neither is it mentioned in the window schedule matrix SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-913-WINDOW SCHEDULE (ALUMINIUM EXT).Please confirm this window is necessary.ANSWER No.207:Window A86 is no longer necessary in the project as indicated in the SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-913-WINDOW SCHEDULE (ALUMINIUM EXT)QUESTION No.208:Given the complexity of this project and the fact that it is a lump-sum contract, as well as considering the large number of clarifications (both administrative & technical) as of now and other pending questions that have not been replied to so far, we believe the bidders do need some more time to analyze this project fully, carefully calculate the project cost in detail and further consolidate the cooperation with the local and regional partners. In order to submit a competitive bid, we sincerely hope we can obtain the Client's approval to extend the bid-submission deadline by one month to July 30th, 2025.ANSWER No.208:The deadline for submissions remains June 30, 2025, until 3:00 p.m. (Sint Maarten time).QUESTION No.209:We are interested in Point Blanche Prison and House of Detention Project in Sint Maarten, Dutch Caribbean. However, owing to the following reasons and challenges, we would like to explore the possibility of extending the bid-submission deadline for three weeks from now:1) This project involves a wide range of aspects which necessitates the need to spend more time in inquiring the cost of materials, comparing the prices from different suppliers and communicating with insurance companies,etc.2) This project is quite complicated in terms of techniques which call for more time to conduct the thorough and careful analysis.3) Contractors need more time to look for suitable JV members and local subcontractors.4) Contractors need more time to ponder a great amount of RFIs and analyze and adjust bidding strategies and documents accordingly.5) This project has a quite high and strict standard on contractor’s bid.We sincerely hope that you as the client could consider this proposal of extending the current bid-submission deadline for three weeks.ANSWER No.209:The deadline for submissions remains June 30, 2025, until 3:00 p.m. (Sint Maarten time).QUESTION No.210:We have encountered similar problems as public projects. The time required for relevant personnel and workers to enter Saint Martin through normal procedures is too long (expected to take at least 6 months), and there are too many departments that need approval, which will definitely affect the construction period. Are there any other exemption procedures for personnel to enter quickly? To avoid delaying the project schedule.ANSWER No.210:The registration in the Country is an obligation of the contractor once awarded.It is our understanding that the process should take between 4 and 6 weeks, even if the practice shows that sometime it lasts longer.Nonetheless, the Contractor will count with the suppport of UNOPS. As part of that, UNOPS has already reached out the Authority requesting "fast track" for the registration and it is confident that a practical solution will be found not to obstruct the contactor getting enabled to operate in the country.The Contractor shall set up is working program and schedule based on the assumption that the permit will be released within a reasonable time.During the award process, the parties will get into the detail and, provided that the Contractor will be able to fully comply with the local requirements to obtain the registration, if needed an extnsion might be granted.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.196:In the document of 3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_Returnable Schedules-0.4 Capacity and Experience, what is the difference between "2. All current contracts underway" and "3. All contracts committed to start"? Looking forward to receiving your kind clarification.ANSWER No.196:"All current contracts underway" refers to contracts with active work in progress, where services are being delivered and resources expended. "All contracts committed to start" are formally agreed and signed contracts awaiting their start date, currently in a pre-execution phase. Underway means active execution, while committed to start means agreed upon but pending execution.QUESTION No.197:Are drawings numbered SXM-MBU-ST-DRA-437_Main Building Ground Slab Plan View Reinforcement +159 1_4 & 2_4 duplicates of SXM-MBU-ST-DRA-437_Main Building Ground Slab Plan View Reinforcement +159? Which drawing should be followed as the authoritative version?ANSWER No.197:Please refer to SXM-MBU-ST-DRA-437_Main building Ground Slab Plan View Reinforcement +159 1_4&4_4QUESTION No.198:In “Structure Main building Level 1 Slab Plan View Reinforcement +163.00”, Can detailed drawings be provided for the "U"-shaped stirrups used in raft foundations and floor edge closures?ANSWER No.198:Please check details reinforcement in drawing SXM-ZZZ-ST-DRA-501_Wards, columns, beams and general details 2-2QUESTION No.199:Could you provide the shear wall layout plan and a frame column schedule?ANSWER No.199:Please refer to the following documents:SXM-ZZZ-ST-DRA-501_Wards, columns, beams and general details 1-2SXM-ZZZ-ST-DRA-501_Wards, columns, beams and general details 2-2SXM-ZZZ-ST-REP-702_Calculation report.pdfQUESTION No.200:Could you provide the Specific Technical Requirements for the Wastewater Treatment Plant？ANSWER No.200:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-SA-REP-703_Technical Specification, paragraph 5.3. Waste water treatment plant.QUESTION No.201:Could you kindly provide Specific Technical Requirements for Portable furniture?ANSWER No.201:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. The Furniture has been removed from the Bill of Quantities.QUESTION No.202:In drawing SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900-WALL ASSEMBLIES, does the exterior wall "texture concrete" refer to coral stone imitation concrete or concrete with acrylic sand paint (rock-like coating)? Are there reference images available? Looking forward to receiving your kind reply.ANSWER No.202:Please refert to SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702_Technical Specification, section 3.4.2.2. Formwork - (b) Corrugated Steel Sheets.QUESTION No.203:Given the on-site humidity conditions, should exposed metal components comply with salt spray corrosion resistance standards?ANSWER No.203:Please refer to technical specifications where Metal components are mentioned for requirementsQUESTION No.204:Since the exisiting prison facilities will be demolished and the new prison facilities will be built. Correspondingly, whether the procedures with the relevant authorities for the expansion of electrical capacity for the new prison facilities is to be resolved by the Employer and the Employer bear the corresponding costs for the electricity capacity expansion procedures?ANSWER No.204:The Contractor is responsible for coordinating with public and private agencies, preparing necessary documentation, processing required permits, and covering any related costs for connecting permanent and temporary facilities to public services. This explicitly includes electrical connection for permanent facilities. (See Schedule 3.1 Scope of Works, 2. New construction, Connectivity)Therefore, the procedures with the relevant authorities for the expansion of electrical capacity for the new prison facilities and the corresponding costs for these procedures are to be resolved and borne by the Contractor.QUESTION No.205:We didn't find the supervision enginner/consultant for this project, so whether the supervision engineer/consultant is already there or not? If not, will the supervision firm be finalized before the commencement of  construction of the project?ANSWER No.205:The Engineer's and supervision firm's details will be shared with the selected bidder before contract signing.QUESTION No.206:We kindly ask if it is possible to have 3D drawings for each type of steel staircase, type 1 to 4 for the Main Building and staircase type 6 & 7 for the wards. Or, if that is not possible, can you help us to identify all the seven types of staircases on the overall plans. Can you please clarify by linking the section drawing to the plan. We kindly ask if it is possible to have 3D drawings for each type of steel staircase, type 1 to 4 for the Main Building and staircase type 6 & 7 for the wards. Or, if that is not possible, can you help us to identify all the seven types of staircases on the overall plans. Can you please clarify by linking the section drawing to the plan.ANSWER No.206:Please refer to :SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-500SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-501SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-502SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-503SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-504SXM-W01-AR-DRA-505SXM-W01-AR-DRA-506SXM-W01-AR-DRA-507SXM-W01-AR-DRA-508SXM-W01-AR-DRA-509SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-510

New clarification added: QUESTION No.191:Since this is lump-sum contract, whether the contract price will be adjusted/adjustable in the situations when the design changes or variations occurred? Please kindly conifrm on this aspect. Thanks a lot.ANSWER No.191:Please refer to Clause 13, "Variations and Adjustments," in the General Conditions of the Contract for Major Works.QUESTION No.192:In the document of  3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedules-4.9 Insurance Details and Insurances, we think this form is for reference ONLY and not applicable for this bidding stage as all the details (Name of Insurer, Policy No., Insured Amount, Renewal Date, Name of Broker, Contact details of Broker) can't be determined in this stage which is to be finanlized in the execution period, could you kindly confirm on this aspect？This form should be left blank, what we bidders need to submit is the confirmation letter from the insurance company that the insurance company will issue the insurances policies to the successful wining offeror based on the requirment in this solicition document.ANSWER No.192:In accordance with Technical Criterion 2.3 of Section II (Evaluation Method and Criteria), your proposal must demonstrate how the insurance requirements will be fulfilled. This can be done by either proving your existing insurance policies meet the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements or by submitting a confirmation letter committing to obtain the specified insurances in Schedule 3.10 [Insurance Requirements] if awarded the contract.To demonstrate compliance, please provide the following:1. Completed Schedule 4.9 [Insurance Details and Insurances] detailing your current insurance policy information to confirm adherence to the requirements. Alternatively, if you are providing a confirmation letter, include basic insurance details within this schedule and clearly reference the attached confirmation letter. We advise against submitting a blank schedule.2. A confirmation letter (or draft policy) from an insurer verifying their commitment to issue the required insurance policies as outlined, should you be selected.QUESTION No.193:As this prison project will be constructed in stages, and the prisoners will also be transferred in stages (from existing facilities to newly built facilities). Does this mean that the project can be handed-over section by setcion? And the defects notification period applies to the handed-over sections instead of the completion of the whole project? Please kindly confirm on this aspect.ANSWER No.193:We anticipate substantial completion will be achieved section by section, corresponding to project phases, and the Defects Notification Period (DNP) will be applied according to sub-clause 1.14. Although Schedule 1.1 doesn't yet define specific sections, sub-clause 1.14(b) grants the Engineer the ability to designate parts of the works as additional sections.QUESTION No.194:“Latent Defect” means any defect in the Works attributable to:(a) the design and/or construction of the Works for which the Contractor isresponsible;(b) Plant, Materials or workmanship not being in accordance with the Contract; or(c) failure of the Contractor to comply with any other obligation under theContract, which a reasonable examination by the Employer prior to expiry of the last DNP would not have disclosed, and such defect results in the Works or part of the Works not being able to be used for the purposes for which they are intended by the Employer, causes the full or partial collapse of the Works, and/or threatens the stability or safety of the Works.We found that this latent defect seems to include all the possible defects occurred after the DNP (defects notifictaion period). It seems there is no obvious difference between DNP and latent defect period. Therefore the total warranty period for this project is 12 months plus five years,which equals to six years in total. Please kindly confirm whether our perspective is correct as we didn't observe the difference between those two periods.ANSWER No.194:Yes, your perspective is correct. The total warranty period for this project is indeed six years.This is comprised of: a) Defects Notification Period (DNP): 12 months  (for defects discoverable by reasonable examination during this period). b) Latent Defect Period: 5 years  (for defects not reasonably discoverable during the DNP, which manifest later and impact the Works' usability, stability, or safety).The contract clearly differentiates between these two periods based on when a defect would reasonably be disclosed. We recall this clause is largely accepted in the industry best practice.QUESTION No.195:Concerning the PV System, does the employer have recommended manufacturers and models for photovoltaic modules and inverters?ANSWER No.195:There are no preferred manufacturers.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.186:Ref. Sub-clause 4.1.h of the General Conditions, we kindly ask that you consider additional wording that the Engineer should state the extent to which the Contractor's Documents are not in accordance with the Contract, to enable the Contractor to produce a compliant revision 1, and to delete the criterion "acceptable", which is subjective. Compliance with all the Contract requirements should suffice.ANSWER No.186:Clear, actionable feedback is crucial for the Contractor to efficiently revise documents. While Sub-Clause 4.1(h) requires the Engineer to state when documents are not acceptable or compliant, implying a need for explanation, we will interpret this to mean the Engineer must provide sufficient detail for the Contractor to understand and correct deficiencies. The term "acceptable" in the Engineer's review means documents must meet contract requirements, align with project objectives and best practices, and be practically implementable, reflecting the Engineer's professional judgment under Sub-Clause 3.1(c). Therefore, the contract conditions will remain unchanged, but the requirement for the Engineer to specify how documents are non-compliant will be understood as needing enough detail for effective correction, ensuring an efficient review and high-quality documents.Contract management will adhere to the highest standards, following best practices of FIDIC alongside UNOPS rules and regulations.QUESTION No.187:Ref. Schedule 3 item 3.5.a, please consider adding the word “Notice”, making it clear that activities will be mentioned in the Commencement Date Notice. Ref. Schedule 3 item 3.5.a, please consider adding the word “Notice”, making it clear that activities will be mentioned in the Commencement Date Notice.ANSWER No.187:Please refer Sub-clause 8.1 Commencement of Work, a). "The Engineer shall give the Contractor no less than seven (7) days notice of the Commencement Date of the Works which shall be within twenty-eight (28) days of the Contract Effective Date."QUESTION No.188:Ref. Sub-clause 1.6 of the General Conditions, allows the client to assign the Contract. We kindly ask that you include wording to the effect that UNOPS would provide a payment guarantee in such a case.ANSWER No.188:Sub-Clause 1.6(a) allows UNOPS to novate, assign, transfer, and/or charge the benefit of the Contract, a standard provision reflecting its operational model as a UN subsidiary. As an intergovernmental organization with reserved privileges and immunities under Sub-Clause 1.24(a) that extend to its financial undertakings, providing a separate payment guarantee upon assignment is not UNOPS' standard practice due to its unique status and robust financial oversight. The Contractor's financial security is addressed through established payment terms, advance payment security (if applicable), and performance security within the existing contractual framework. Therefore, additional wording for a payment guarantee upon contract assignment cannot be included, and the general contract conditions will remain unchanged.QUESTION No.189:Ref. Sub-clause 14.16.a of the General Conditions, we acknowledge the Client's need for such audit and investigation, however if the Contractor is required to finalize all claims for the last two statements, then it would only be fair if the Client makes use of the 31 months leading upto, plus 3 months afterwards [not 2 years] for the last 2 statements, to carry out such audits and investigations. Once demobilized it is very disruptive to remobilize personnel to serve the auditors / investigators and with no means of compensation. We kindly ask that you consider re-wording accordingly.ANSWER No.189:UNOPS' standard two-year post-payment audit period after contract expiration or termination (Sub-Clause 14.16(a)) is necessary for thorough financial accountability and compliance as a UN entity and its obligation to demonstrate prudent use of funds. While a shorter audit window aligned with final statements is preferred, it would significantly limit the effectiveness and scope of necessary post-payment audits. Despite potential inconvenience to the Contractor, robust oversight requires this provision. The Contractor is expected to maintain comprehensive records as per Sub-Clause 20.3(f), which should facilitate any future audit requirements. Therefore, Sub-Clause 14.16(a) will remain unchanged.QUESTION No.190:Ref. Schedule 3 section 3.6, please confirm that there are no Nominated Subcontractors.ANSWER No.190:We confirm that there are no nominated subcontractors.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.181:We understand your response to RFI 27 such that the Contract Drawings included in the Contract Documents, will not be at final issued-for-construction [IFC] state, and that the Contractor would be responsible for the remainder design development to produce IFC drawings. Our understanding of the Contract principles is that it is a Red FIDIC bid-build contract with all design for Permanent Works Owner-provided i.e. limiting any Contractor-provided design to Temporary Works. We have no issue with Permanent Works Drawings not being at IFC state by the Contract Effective Date, as long as the Contract time schedule comprises one or several milestones reflecting IFC due dates. However, we would have difficulties if the design responsibility for Permanent Works, was split between ourselves and the Owner's engineer. We kindly ask that you reconsider your response to RFI 27.ANSWER No.181:This Answer also clarifies Answer No.27 as follows:This Construction Contract is a bid & build type.The Employer is responsible for the Permanent Works design; and he retains the fundamental design liability for the Permanent Works; the Contractor's design responsibility is limited (refSub-Clause 4.1(c)(ii)).The Employer is responsible for the "Issued for Construction (IFC)" drawings.The IFC will include changes (if any) between the current "for Bid" Dossier" and the IFC; the parties shall agree on these changes according to the variations procedure.Variations (if any) might result in addition or deduction (e.g. value engineering).Notwithstanding, the Contractor remain responsible to further develop the IFC into the "Final executive Drawings" (FED). He will develop and submit the shop drawings (and other technical docs might be needed) to enable the Employer approving the constructuion/execution pahse.QUESTION No.182:Sub-clause 1.1 of the General Conditions defines "Cost" as excluding overhead and profit and "Cost Plus Profit" as Cost plus Profit [but no overhead], and Schedule 3 item 3.4.1.1 specifies such Profit as zero. We kindly ask that you consider re-wording to cover non-Project-specific overheads, and especially in cases where such risk also causes EOT, where our deployed resources would be unable to recover overheads during any extended period.ANSWER No.182:As Schedule 3.4 Valuation and Payment, sub-clause No. 1.1 indicates, cost plus profit is not applicable.QUESTION No.183:Ref. Sub-clause 3.5.h of the General Conditions, a determination of the Engineer can potentially be corrected and at such time ceases to be binding. Please clarify how and why an agreement, once reached, can be non-binding anymore.ANSWER No.183:Sub-Clause 3.5(h) states agreements and determinations are binding until corrected under Sub-Clause 3.5 or a determination is revised under Clause 20. Sub-Clause 3.5(i) allows the Engineer to correct typographical, clerical, or arithmetical errors in a determination within seven days of notification. While both are binding, only determinations can be unilaterally "corrected" by the Engineer for these specific errors. Agreements, being mutual, are generally final and require mutual consent to amend or set aside, unless a fundamental issue exists. The "correction" mentioned in Sub-Clause 3.5(h) primarily applies to determinations, as correcting an agreement for minor errors necessitates further mutual agreement, not a unilateral act by the Engineer. Thus, a formal agreement is binding unless mutually changed or fundamentally flawed, while the correction mechanism addresses minor errors in Engineer's determinations.QUESTION No.184:Ref. Schedule 2 item 2.1.c.2 the design included in the RFP documents is referred to as the “Final Executive Design”.However, ref. Schedule 3 item 3.5.a requires the Schedule for Works to include for "the development of the design". Please clarify whether the client-provided design will require further development post Base Date, or whether the design included in the RFP documents, is already issued for construction.Ref. Schedule 2 item 2.1.c.2 the design included in the RFP documents is referred to as the “Final Executive Design”.However, ref. Schedule 3 item 3.5.a requires the Schedule for Works to include for "the development of the design". Please clarify whether the client-provided design will require further development post Base Date, or whether the design included in the RFP documents, is already issued for construction.ANSWER No.184:Please refer as well to Answer to Q#174 aboveThe “Final Executive Design” or the For BiD dossier included in the RFP documents has sufficient details for costing/pricing.Schedule 3 item 3.5.a informs that some further development -such as shop drawings, detailed construction drawings or coordination- are still required.We confirm the contractor is expected to further develop the IFC design before starting construction (i.e. shop drawings) and get approval by the employer/engineer prior to start execution.QUESTION No.185:Ref. Sub-clause 10.1.a line items (i) through (x) of the General Conditions, lists the prerequisites for Taking-Over. Please clarify that line item (x) "a Taking-Over Certificate has been issued" is a prerequisite for Taking-Over.ANSWER No.185:The listing of the Taking-Over Certificate within the prerequisites for Works Completion under Sub-Clause 10.1(a) indicates that its issuance is the formal confirmation by the Engineer that all preceding conditions (i)-(ix) have been met. Therefore, while listed as a prerequisite, the Taking-Over Certificate (x) acts as the formal and culminating act signifying satisfactory completion and official handover to the Employer. Without the certificate, formal Taking Over has not occurred, even if all other conditions are met.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.173:Sub-clause 14.12 of the General Conditions provides that, should the Contractor fail to provide such discharge, the latter shall be deemed submitted. We kindly ask that you consider re-wording such that the discharge be a prerequisite for the final payment.ANSWER No.173:We acknowledge your preference for the discharge to be a prerequisite for final payment under Sub-Clause 14.12. However, the current wording, which considers the discharge submitted if the Contractor fails to provide it, is important for ensuring timely financial closure, even with unresolved issues. This prevents indefinite delays to final payment, which could cause significant problems for the Employer. While the discharge signifies payment finality, Clause 14.12 (d) allows the Contractor to still pursue legitimate disputed amounts via Clause 21 (Dispute Resolution). Therefore, the existing contract conditions regarding Sub-Clause 14.12 will remain unchanged.QUESTION No.174:Sub-clause 14.14 of the General Conditions constitutes a claim waiver to the client's benefit, except for amounts which the Contractor has expressly mentioned in the statement at Taking-Over as well as in the final statement and which the Engineer has certified. This prohibits the Contactor from the Dispute Resolution procedure for any amount the Engineer disagrees with, hence we kindly ask that you consider re-wording.ANSWER No.174:Sub-Clause 14.14 establishes the Employer's final liability based on the Contractor's payment requests within the contract. It requires the Contractor to present all potential claims in the Statement at Taking Over and Final Statement for the Engineer's assessment. However, this clause does not prevent the Contractor from pursuing dispute resolution under Clause 21. The Sub-Clause 14.12 (d) of the Contract allows continued dispute resolution for ongoing proceedings. Sub-Clause 14.14 aims to prevent new claims after the final payment certificate if they weren't previously presented, ensuring systematic financial closure while preserving dispute resolution for properly submitted, unresolved claims. The general contract conditions remain unchanged.QUESTION No.175:Considering the unique nature of the prison, is there any special requirement for the security system, especially for the software/system compatibility or any special requirements for designated/nominated subcontractors to undertake the security system works?ANSWER No.175:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701 for requirements on the security system.QUESTION No.176:In the document of "3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedules"-4.8 Sources of Naturally Occurring Materials-(Details of any pre-identified sources of construction materials such as borrow pits, quarry sites, water sources, sand sources and likewise), based on our knowledge and actual investigation, there is almost none construction materials are categorized as naturally occurring materials and almost all the materials in the island are imported from abroad. Therefore, whether this form-4.8 Sources of Naturally Occurring Materials is not applicable and can be deleted/ignored. Could you kindly confirm on this aspect?ANSWER No.176:Regarding Schedule 4.8 'Sources of Naturally Occurring Materials,' this form remains applicable for your proposal submission.Even if construction materials are primarily imported, they are still derived from natural sources. This schedule is intended to capture information about the origin of such materials, whether local or international, to ensure a complete understanding of your proposed sourcing.QUESTION No.177:Concerning the PV Sysetm, could the client provide and confirm the power and external dimensions of individual photovoltaic modules?ANSWER No.177:Please refer to section 10 of CALCULATION TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL REPORT (Doc. No. SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-702),and to SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 - ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTIVE REPORTQUESTION No.178:Concerning the PV system, according to the BOQ, there are two 15kW inverters on the AC side of the photovoltaic system, with a power generation installed capacity of 30KW. What is the installed capacity on the DC side?ANSWER No.178:Refer to section 10 of CALCULATION TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL REPORT (Doc. No. SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-702)QUESTION No.179:Concerning the PV System, according to the BOQ , the number of photovoltaic modules is 120, and the installed capacity on the DC side should not exceed 40KW. Therefore, the power of a single module should not exceed 350Wp. Small power modules are currently difficult to buy on the market. Can we choose high-power modules ranging from 500 to 650Wp? If we use high-power modules, then the number of modules will be less than 120, could you kindly clarify on this aspect?ANSWER No.179:Refer toSXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 - ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTIVE REPORTSXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-702 - ELECTRICAL CALCULATION REPORTSXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-703_Electrical Technical SpecificationsQUESTION No.180:In the document of 3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_Returnable Schedules-0.1 Proposal Submission Declaration, we found that it looks similar like Letter of Bid, but there is no requirement for Offerors to fill in the bid price for this project? Could you kindly confirm on this aspect? ANSWER No.180:Due to this tender being a RFP (two envelope methodology), Schedule 0.1 is part of the Technical Offer/envelope and must not contain any price information. As per the instructions, all schedules must be completed as indicated without alteration. Price information is strictly reserved for the Financial envelope documents/schedules. Any inclusion of pricing information outside this envelope will result in the invalidation of your offer.

New clarification added: MINUTES OF THE 2ND PRE-BID MEETING1. IntroductionA second pre-bid meeting was held on May 28, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. (Sint Maarten local time) via Google Meet.As stated in the Request for Proposal documents, specifically in Article 9 of Section I. Instructions to Bidders, the clarification meeting shall be conducted for the purpose of clarifying the most relevant points from the solicitation documents.2. Q&A and ClarificationsIt was emphasized that UNOPS would not provide official responses to bidders' questions regarding the Request for Proposal during the clarification meeting. All questions must be submitted in writing through the UNOPS eSourcing platform.Bidders were cautioned not to rely on any statements, assertions, or information provided during the clarification meeting unless confirmed in writing by UNOPS.3. Presentation OverviewClarifications on technical aspects of the procurement process were addressed during the meeting, specifically in response to frequently asked questions submitted during the clarification period.  A presentation was delivered covering these points:Lump Sum PriceDesign liability and responsibilityPaymentsScope of Works  exclusions - Amendment 3Project Execution and Construction PhasingPriority of Technical DocumentationUpdate on the current Site situation4. Submitting Clarification RequestsAs stipulated in the Request for Proposal documents, attendees were informed that all inquiries or requests for clarification must be formally submitted through the "Request a Clarification" option in the "Tender Information" section of eSourcing, which serves as the sole communication channel for this process.5. Importance of Thorough Bid PreparationAttendees were reminded of the importance of carefully reviewing, analyzing, and considering all information provided in the bidding documents and the eSourcing system when preparing their bids.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.168:We kindly ask that you consider waiving the requirement under Sub-clause 4.2.g/i/j of the General Conditions [parent company guarantee + associated legal opinion + financial reporting]. We think that the amount of Performance Security and retention money combined with remedies under the Contract, provides the Client with ample assurance that the Contractor will fulfil its obligations under the Contract.ANSWER No.168:The general contract conditions remain unchanged. The Bidder is reminded that UNOPS, at its sole discretion and depending on the identified risk level, may request the Contractor to provide a parent company guarantee. This could include a legal opinion regarding the guarantor's obligations under the parent company guarantee and any other financial or other information UNOPS deems necessary to verify the parent company's suitability, in accordance with sub-clause 4.2, literals g), i), and j).QUESTION No.169:Ref. Sub-clause 4.2.k of the General Conditions, please confirm that the reference determination is a determination given by the Engineer and not any determination under the dispute resolution procedure.ANSWER No.169:Sub-Clause 4.2(k) requires the Performance Security to remain valid until the Final Completion Certificate is issued and site clearance is complete, or, if a dispute arises, until its final determination, whichever is later. "Final determination" includes both Engineer's determinations becoming final and binding and resolutions reached through formal dispute resolution under Clause 21, such as arbitration awards. Therefore, the Performance Security must remain valid throughout any dispute resolution process, ensuring continuous security for the Employer during claims and disputes.QUESTION No.170:The bid validity period is 3 months, plus 1 month between Effective Date and Commencement Date, plus 31 months' Time for Completion. This is almost three years [not counting potential prolongation of the bid validity period with no specified limit]. Hence, we kindly ask that you consider including either a substantial inflation contingency, pricing or preferably, an escalation model [Sub-clause 13.7 of the General Conditions]. Such an adjustment could reflect costs only, excluding overhead and profit.ANSWER No.170:The initial requirement is maintained. No adjustments will be made for fluctuations in the cost of labor, Goods, or other Works inputs over the project's lifecycle. Bidders are responsible for including all necessary mitigation measures in their financial proposals.QUESTION No.171:Sub-clause 14.10.c of the General Conditions comprises a waiver for all Claims where the underlying events or circumstances dates are earlier than the Statement at Taking-Over or 28 days after the date that the Taking-Over Certificate was issued.  Sub-clause 14.10.a of the General Conditions obliges the Contractor to include all such Claims in the Statement at Taking-Over, following which the engineer will issue a payment certificate as per Sub-clauses 14.10.b and 14.6 of the General Conditions, which means such amount as the Engineer determines. Hence, the Sub-clause 14.10.c waiver would also include disputed amounts, which the Engineer has not determined and certified, therefore denying the Contractor the Dispute Resolution procedure for such amounts. We kindly ask that you consider re-wording.ANSWER No.171:The intention of Sub-Clause 14.10 (c) is to ensure the timely submission of all claims by the Contractor relating to events or circumstances that have occurred up to the date of the Taking-Over Certificate, thus providing a defined cut-off for the initiation of such claims. It is not intended to deny the Contractor the right to pursue a Dispute Resolution procedure for amounts properly claimed in the Statement at Taking Over but which the Engineer subsequently does not agree to certify in full.QUESTION No.172:Ref. the discharge form required for the final statement [Schedule 5 form 5.3], which includes a waiver to the effect that the Contractor has submitted all claims, and we agree. However, it also requires the Contractor to release the Client from all Claims and such discharge becomes effective upon full payment of the amount certified in the Final Payment Certificate. This means the Contractor would waive any disputed amount included in its final statement [amounts the Engineer has not determined and certified], denying the Contractor the Dispute Resolution procedure for such amounts. We kindly ask that you consider re-wording.ANSWER No.172:The purpose of the discharge form is to confirm the finality of the agreed and certified payments and to close out the financial aspects of the contract once all undisputed amounts have been settled. It is not designed to override the Contractor's fundamental right to invoke the dispute resolution procedures under Clause 21 for legitimate disagreements that could not be resolved by the Engineer (please refer to clause 14.12 (d)).

New clarification added: QUESTION No.164:SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report/10. Panels (Racks), SXM-ZZZ-TE-DRA-501-DATA NETWORK - DETAILSReference: Page N/A TechnicalIn relation to the previous question, it is necessary to define the minimum and maximum dimensions of the cabinets, since the BoQ refers to 20U cabinets, while the drawings "SXM-ZZZ-TE-DRA-501-DATA NETWORK - DETAILS" indicate dimensions of 600x900x1400 mm, which do not correspond to standard sizes for communication cabinets.Therefore, we kindly request that the contracting authority allow the proposal of cabinets with standard dimensions, such as 24U or 42U.ANSWER No.164:Please refer to Amendment No 3.Yes, standard cabinet sizes like 24U or 42U can be proposed instead of 20U, as long as they meet the project’s functional and spatial requirements.QUESTION No.165:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities, Apartado 2 FED BOQ DESIGN Main building 2,530 y Wards 3530, concepto 2,538 y 3,537.SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701_Descriptive Report/ 6. Avigilon Intercom VideoReference: Page N/A TechnicalIn the file "SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities," section 2 FED BOQ DESIGN, there is a reference to a "Voice System" which is not mentioned in the provided descriptive reports.We kindly request the contracting authority to specify the characteristics and scope of the "Voice System" solution and clarify which of the following systems it refers to:a) Public address system (PA)b) IP telephonyc) Intercom system as referenced in document "SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701_Descriptive Report," section 6: Avigilon Intercom Video.ANSWER No.165:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701.Please consider the following clarifications :Voice system refers and includes all three subsystems here mentioned:a) Public Addres System (PA),b) IP Telephony, andc) Intercom systemWhen quoting this system the lump sum cost would be the sum of these three subsytems.QUESTION No.166:We kindly ask that you consider either retention guarantee, bond or Letter of Credit in lieu of retention money?ANSWER No.166:See Amendment No. 3. The performance security amount has increased to 7% of the accepted contract amount, and the retention money to be deducted from the interim payment certificate (IPC) has decreased to 3%.QUESTION No.167:Sub-clause 14.8 of the General Conditions entitles the Contractor to interest on late payment, however Contract Detail Sub-clause 14.8 states "n/a" with respect to the applicable rate. We kindly ask that you consider interest on late payment, as per FIDIC General Conditions default wording.ANSWER No.167:The requirement remains in place. Bidders are informed that UNOPS has the necessary funds to finance all work and will adhere to the payment terms and procedures outlined in the contract.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.158:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities 3. FED GLOBAL FURNITURESReference: Page TechnicalWe kindly request the contracting authority to share the layout plan indicating the location of the furniture and equipment.ANSWER No.158:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. The Furniture has been removed from the Bill of Quantities.QUESTION No.159:SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report. 5. Wifi SystemReference: Page 4 TechnicalIs there an Executive Project available for the Wi-Fi system? If not, please specify in which zones or areas of the modules this service is required.ANSWER No.159:See Amendment No 3. As there is currently no Executive Project defining the Wi-Fi system or its required coverage areas, this amendment establishes that the Wi-Fi network shall provide coverage throughout the all building.QUESTION No.160:As per drawing SXM-MBU-EL-DRA-413, for some of the fixtures description of the fixtures and power rates on the symbol are not matching. Please advise which one should be followed. Also for some fixtures like 2’x2’ fixture, only for surface mounted type fixture’s part number was given. But when we review the drawings, there are recessed types as well. Could you please provide part numbers for all types of fixtures?ANSWER No.160:The Contractor can propose any brand as long as the techincal luminaries specifications are met (dimensions, voltage level, CCT, CRI, etc.).Please refer to the layout SXM-MBU-EL-DRA-413 for the power rates and mounting type shown on.QUESTION No.161:There are some drawings provided within the "Final Executive Design" Set, however they are not indicated in the document list "SXM-ZZZ-GE-DLT-001_Document List - Revision 31032025". Document names are as follows;SXM-ZZZ-FS-DRA-900/901/902/…..../919/920/921SXM-ZZZ-SE-DRA-405/406/407/408SXM-W01-SE-DRA-409/410Please confirm whether these drawings are applicable or not? If so, please provide updated Document List.ANSWER No.161:See Amendment No. 3. Follow the "SXM-ZZZ-GE-DLT-001_Document List - 22052025.xls" version, which is available in the final executive design.QUESTION No.162:We would like to inform that the link for "Building Decree [Bouwbesluit] 2012" under the "3.2 Specifications / 3.2.A / a.General Specification" are not accessable.We kindly request for updated link for "Building Decree [Bouwbesluit] 2012".ANSWER No.162:See Amendment No. 3. The link to the "Building Decree [Bouwbesluit] 2012" has been updated to:https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0030461/2023-09-07QUESTION No.163:Reference is made to document Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497, Section V: Requirements, Chapter 3.10 Insurance Requirements.We kindly request the following clarifications, considering the large costs to be incurred in satisfying insurance requests:Construction all risk insurance for Works, Plants and Materials - Required Limit of liability: 100 % of the Contract Amount.Question: Confirm if the liability limit to be considered 100% of the contract amount. Also, it is asked if the policy can have a one-year guarantee and subsequently renew it or if it is necessary to issue a policy valid for the 32 months of the contract from its first issuePublic liability insurance - Contract Works -  Required Limit of liability: Full value of the contract works inclusive of materials, wages, freight, etc.Question: Confirm if the liability limit to be considered 100% of the contract amount. Also, it is asked if the policy can have a one-year guarantee and subsequently renew it or if it is necessary to issue a policy valid for the 32 months of the contract from its first issue.Professional indemnity insurance - Required Limit of liability: 100 % of the Contract Amount.Question: Confirm if the liability limit to be considered 100% of the contract amount. Also, it is asked if the policy can have a one-year guarantee and subsequently renew it or if it is necessary to issue a policy valid for the 32 months of the contract from its first issue.ANSWER No.163:a) & b) Please refer to Section V Requirements - Annex 3.10 Insurance Requirements, to confirm the validity period and Limit of liability. The validity period must cover the "Time for Completion" of the entire Works (31 months including one month for mobilisation) plus the demobilization periods.c) See Amendment No. 3. The Professional indemnity insurance has been removed for the requirements.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.147:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment13.1Reference: Page 61 TechnicalIt is established that the Contractor shall be responsible for the procurement, transportation, and installation of the furniture specified in the Final Executive Design, including —but not limited to— beds, shelves, desks, and stools for inmate cells, as well as workstations for personnel, office chairs, tables, counters, among others. In this regard, would it be possible to provide a presentation or catalog detailing the expected finishes for each type of furniture?ANSWER No.147:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. The Furniture has been removed from the Bill of Quantities.QUESTION No.148:Sección II Métodos y criterios de evaluación Parte 2: Metodología propuesta, enfoque y plan de implementación; Numeral 2.3Reference: Page pag 11 LegalIn relation to the insurance requirements for this RFP, we kindly request clarification on which additional insurance policies must be provided, beyond those already mentioned. Specifically, should coverage for Construction Risk, Civil Liability, Workers' Compensation, compliance with Local Laws and Practices, and Professional Liability also be included?ANSWER No.148:See Amendment No. 3. The insurance requirements are listed on the Schedule 3.10 Insurance Requirements. The Professional indemnity insurance has been removed for the requirements.QUESTION No.149:"Documento 3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedulesReference: Page 24 AdministrativeWith respect to the evaluation criteria for the Construction Manager, Quality Control Manager, HSSE Specialist, and Liaison Officer, please note that in Mexico, there is no Bachelor's Degree in Safety and Hygiene—only diploma programs in the field. In this regard, would it be acceptable to present such diplomas as evidence to meet the requirement?ANSWER No.149:See Amendment No. 3. In Schedule 3.8 (Key Personnel Requirements), the "Required qualification" states "Bachelor’s degree or equivalent (e.g. official diploma) " which allows offerors to propose personnel based on degrees availability in their country.QUESTION No.150:TE Telecomunication "Documento SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report"Reference: Page TechnicalWe kindly request the contracting authority to specify the technical characteristics or requirements related to the firewall mentioned in the Descriptive ReportANSWER No.150:See Amendment No 3. Document SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report was reissued including a new section with the requirements or technical characteristics of the Firewall.QUESTION No.151:We kindly ask for the schedule and specifications for the basketball, football and volleyball equipment in the multipurpose court.ANSWER No.151:See Amendment No. 3. The equipment of the multipurpose sport court are not part of the Scope Of WorksQUESTION No.152:We kindly ask for clarification regarding what is considered by exterior equipment (BoQ item 2.643 & 3.643). We kindly ask for the schedule and specifications for the equipment mentioned.ANSWER No.152:See Amendment No. 3. Equipment items 2.643 and 3.643 are not part of the Scope Of WorksQUESTION No.153:We kindly ask for the schedule and specifications for the health equipment.ANSWER No.153:See Amendment No. 3. The equipment of the clinic are not part of the Scope Of WorksQUESTION No.154:We kindly ask for the schedule and specifications for the industrial kitchen.ANSWER No.154:See Amendment No. 3. Equipment of the industrial kitchen are not part of the Scope Of WorksQUESTION No.155:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 62. Vehicle accessReference: Page TechnicalItems:69. Vertical signage71. Horizontal marking72. Bollards73. Speed bumpsWe kindly request the contracting authority to indicate whether there are plans specifying in detail the horizontal and vertical signage, the type of bollard, as well as the dimensions and location of the speed bumps. If such plans are not available, please clarify in which section or document this information can be found, or alternatively, if it is the contractor’s responsibility to propose it.ANSWER No.155:See Amendment No. 3. The drawing "SXM-ZZZ-EW-DRA-407" have been added to the Final executive design.QUESTION No.156:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 795. EquipmentsReference: Page TechnicalItems:798. Exterior equipment800. Cell equipment801. Office equipment802. Inmate equipmentWe kindly request the contracting authority to specify the elements or components included under each of the referenced items.ANSWER No.156:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. Items: Exterior equipment, Cell equipment, Office equipment and Inmate equipment have been removed from the Bill of Quantities.QUESTION No.157:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 795. EquipmentsReference: Page TechnicalItems:796. Countertops797. Toilet Box798. Exterior Equipment799. Railings800. Cell Equipment801. Office Equipment802. Inmate Equipment803. Single Bed804. Bunk Bed805. ClosetWe kindly request the contracting authority to provide a detailed plan for the listed items, specifying their location, construction materials, dimensions, technical specifications, and whether commercial brands will be used. If such a plan is not available, please indicate in which document this information can be found, or confirm whether it is the contractor’s responsibility to propose it.ANSWER No.157:For countertops and toilet boxes, please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702_Technical Specification and SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-800 to 859.For Railings please see SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-918 & SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-919.The rest of the equiments (798, 800, 801, 802, 803 - 804 - 805) have been removed through Amendment N°3 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.141:We kindly ask for technical specifications and detail drawings for the items listed in the sheet "3. FED GLOBAL FURNITURES", as it is also mentioned in item 3.1.2 of Section V "Furniture" as "... which will be evaluated against the specifications provided for every furniture piece included in the Final Executive Design.". We also kindly ask for the basis of design product or reference images for the loose furniture listed in the same sheet mentioned.ANSWER No.141:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. The Furniture has been removed from the Bill of Quantities.QUESTION No.142:We kindly ask for the system & material details of the metal roof over mechanical equipments above the room 035, Heavy Duty Workshop 1.ANSWER No.142:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. Above room 035 is a 24-gauge galvanized steel standing seam metal roofing. For structural system please refer to SXM-MBU-ST-DRA-507.QUESTION No.143:The CAD files for the sheets listed below have been shared, but the files are empty. We kindly request that the CAD files mentioned be re-shared:MBU-AR-DRA-808MBU-AR-DRA-811W01-AR-DRA-462ZZZ-AR-DRA-300ANSWER No.143:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. The folder “4.3 Additional CAD Files” has been added to the Technical Annexes.QUESTION No.144:We kindly ask you to provide a specification of the regulatory requirements that all the furniture to be supplied must meet.ANSWER No.144:Please refer to Amendment No. 3. The Furniture has been removed from the Bill of Quantities.QUESTION No.145:We kindly ask you to confirm whether the access road to the prison is government property and in the event that it is damaged by the large number of heavy vehicles passing through, bidders should take into account that any restoration work will be covered by the project. this period is mandatory or, if it is considered insufficient, if the technical-economic offer is taken into consideration, or rejected and/or not considered.ANSWER No.145:The access road to the prison is government property. Any damage to this public road caused by project-related heavy vehicle traffic will be subject to the regulations governing public infrastructure.QUESTION No.146:We kindly ask you to confirm whether the access road to the prison is government property and in the event that it is damaged by the large number of heavy vehicles passing through during the project, bidders should take into account that any restoration work will be covered by the project.ANSWER No.146:The access road to the prison is government property. Any damage to this public road caused by project-related heavy vehicle traffic will be subject to the regulations governing public infrastructure. 

New amendment added #3: Refer to Amendment No. 3 under the Documents tab for further information.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.139:We kindly ask that you consider deleting removal criterion (ii) ["incompetence"] from Sub-clause GC 6.9.c of the General Conditions. This criterion is too subjective and such a provision could be misused.ANSWER No.139:The general contract conditions remain unchanged.QUESTION No.140:We kindly ask that you consider adding a provision that addresses changes in codes and standards after the Base Date. For example, the client would decide whether the original code / standard shall apply or the new one, and in the latter case Clause 13 of the General Conditions would apply.ANSWER No.140:Please refer to General Conditions of Contract, sub-clause 13.6 Adjustments for Changes in Laws 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.130:There are 2 drawings provided in the "Final Executive Design" Set / Sanitary section, named "SXM-ZZZ-SA-DRA-505".While one of the drawings represents general "Sanitary Details", the other shows "Details - Waste Water Pump Station Civil Sanitary".Please confirm whether the both documents are applicable. If so, kindly correct the document numbering.ANSWER No.130:Both documents are applicable.QUESTION No.131:Dear Procurement Officer, can corporate profit tax (34.5%) be exempted for this project?ANSWER No.131:Refer to Tab "TENDER INFORMATION / TENDER PARTICULARS", "Duties and taxes"QUESTION No.132:Dear Procurement Officer, in the document of Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment 1-2. New construction (from Page 56 to page 61), the Employer stipulated the different construction stages (i.e. construction sequences), we want to ask whether the construction stages/construction sequences provided in the document is mandatory for the contractors to follow, or the contractors are allowed to have their own construction stages/construction sequences? Please kindly confim, thanks.ANSWER No.132:The construction stages and sequences provided in the referenced document shall be considered mandatory. Contractors are required to follow them unless a justified alternative is proposed and formally approved by the Employer during the implementation phase, in accordance with the technical specifications and contract provisions.QUESTION No.133:Dear Procurement Officer, could you kindly confirm that all the questions we arised for clarification can be answered? As we found many questions we asked are still not being answered. As these questions are crucial for us to prepare our bid and cost-related and some questions related to the cooperation form with the local partners. So we sincerely hope all the questions could be answered/clarified. Thanks a lot for your kind understanding.ANSWER No.133:All queries submitted will be answered. We will make every effort to respond to all questions promptly. However, please note that those requiring thorough technical analysis may necessitate additional time for a comprehensive response. Rest assured, all inquiries will be addressed as soon as practically possible.QUESTION No.134:Regarding the proposed use of Antigonon leptopus on internal fences, we would like to flag some potential concerns that pointed out by local landscape suppliers:* Its climbing nature may assist scaling, depending on accessibility.* Dense foliage could obstruct visibility or allow concealment.* It requires frequent maintenance to manage growth.We kindly request your guidance on the matter.ANSWER No.134:We appreciate your concern regarding the proposed use of Antigonon leptopus on internal fences. After consideration, we confirm that the specifications will remain unchanged. However, we trust that proper maintenance and security protocols will be implemented to address the potential issues raised.QUESTION No.135:Dear Procurement Officer, in the RFP document, it stipulats that "For whole of the Works: 31 months (including 1 month for mobilization)", could you kindly confirm the total construction period is 31 months which includes 1 month for mobilization? As we saw some inquiries on this platform says that the total construction period is 32 months, which is equal to 1 month mobilization plus 31 month construction. For purpose of clarity, could you kindly confirm it is 31 months in total or 32 months in total? Thanks a lot!ANSWER No.135:See Section IV: Schedule of Details - Schedule 1: Contract Details - 1.1 Details Provided by the Employer - 8.2 Time for Completion: "For whole of the Works: 31 months (including 1 month for mobilization)"QUESTION No.136:SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report/10. Panels (Racks), SXM-ZZZ-TE-DRA-501-DATA NETWORK - DETAILSReference: Page N/A TechnicalIn the descriptive report "SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701", the external characteristics and accessories of the cabinets are mentioned; however, minimum or maximum required dimensions for their installation in the designated spaces are not specified.Is it correct to understand that the mentioned characteristics are indicative rather than limiting, and that it is acceptable to propose cabinets with dimensions and specifications capable of supporting the equipment to be installed in each case?ANSWER No.136:Yes it is correct. Please refer to drawing "SXM-MBU-EL-DRA-456-MAIN BUILDING LAYOUT - ELECTRICAL ROOM - LEVEL 2 & 3" where the racks and other electrical equipment layout is shown.QUESTION No.137:SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report/10. Panels (Racks), SXM-ZZZ-TE-DRA-501-DATA NETWORK - DETAILSReference: Page N/A TechnicalIn the descriptive report "SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701," reference is made to the external characteristics and accessories of the cabinets, stating that they should include a glass door with at least two exhaust fans. However, this configuration is not recommended for the ventilation flow required by telecommunications equipment.Therefore, we kindly request that the contracting authority allow the proposal of cabinets with perforated doors in order to optimize internal ventilation flow.ANSWER No.137:Please to refer to SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701 for requirements of the doors.QUESTION No.138:Wall finish types are defined in room tags as one wall finish type to be applied in each room. Yet, if we follow wall tags rather than room tags, since wall types are being defined with finish -not only the core of the wall- in the sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900, wall finish types also get diversifying for a single room as described with some examples which is not limited by these below.MBU room 04: Wall tag is "P02 - Epoxi paint 2.10 meters high" which is compliant with technical specifications. According to wall types which are C02, B51 and B03; wall finish is interior latex paint and ceramic tile.MBU room 06: Wall tag is "P01 - Latex paint" which is not compliant with technical specifications since waterproof interior paint is defined for high humidity areas in the paragraph 3.18. According to wall types which are C01, B01 and B52; wall finish is interior latex paint and ceramic tile.We kindly request clarification regarding whether room tags or wall tags need to be followed in such situations. Please note that; the situations defined above are just examples, the conflict mentioned is valid for a major part of the project.ANSWER No.138:​Finishes Legend appearing in sheets SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-500 & 501 & 502 & 503 & 504 and SXM-W01-AR-DRA-506 & 507 & 508 & 509 has an independant nomenclature and applies only to the outermost layer affecting the finish of each component.Wall assemblies and floor assembly nomenclature is independant from material finishes.For example, G01 in sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900 - Wall Assemblies refers to a complete wall type assembly and it's finish may vary accoring to the Finishes Legend between T01 - ceramic tyle, P01 - Latex paint, etc. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.122:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 14 TechnicalWhich requeriments are needed for the maximum security locks?ANSWER No.122:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701 for specifications.QUESTION No.123:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 632. Plumbing FixturesReference: Page TechnicalItems:633. Regular toilet634. Vandal-proof toilet635. Regular sink636. Vandal-proof sink637. Kitchen sink638. Built-in lavatory639. Regular accessible shower kit640. Vandal-proof accessible shower kit641. Regular shower kitWe kindly request the contracting authority to indicate which of the listed fixtures must be wall-mounted and specify the type of material or anchoring system required for their installation.ANSWER No.123:Wall-mounted fixtures:- Toilets: Only the toilet shown in drawing SXM-W01-AR-DRA-857 is wall-mounted.- Showers: All showers are wall-mounted, as indicated in the enlarged plans SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-800 to 859.Anchoring system and materials:- Unless otherwise specified in the project’s technical specifications, anchoring and installation shall follow manufacturer’s recommendations.QUESTION No.124:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 835. GeneralReference: Page TechnicalItems:836. Walls837. Roof838. General839. EquipmentWe kindly request the contracting authority to specify what should be understood as the "general concept" under each of the referenced items, in order to clearly determine the scope of each entry.ANSWER No.124:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701 and SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602QUESTION No.125:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 121. GeneralReference: Page TechnicalItems:122. Landscaping123. Open court separation fence H = 5.0 m124. Grass areaWe kindly request the contracting authority to indicate the required quantity of each plant species for landscaping, as well as the type of grass to be used and the designated installation areas. If this information is not available, please specify in which plan it can be found or confirm whether it is the contractor’s responsibility to propose it.ANSWER No.125:Please refer to sheets SXM-ZZZ-LA-DRA-101, 102,103.QUESTION No.126:We kindly ask for locations and specifications of the ceiling fans shown in the detail 3 of the sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-709.ANSWER No.126:Please note that ceiling fans are not part of the contractor’s technical specifications, Bill of Quantities (BoQ), or defined scope of work.QUESTION No.127:We kindly ask for technical specifications for mesh fencing.ANSWER No.127:All fences in the project match the description found in SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-705, namely Galvanized Wire mesh 3.2mm N°10QUESTION No.128:There are some drawings provided within the "Final Executive Design" Set which are uploaded twice (with one having new revision dates), while document list "SXM-ZZZ-GE-DLT-001_Document List - Revision 31032025" indicates the older version of the documents. Related drawing no's are as follows;SXM-MBU-EL-DRA-455/456SXM-MBU-TE-DRA-403/404SXM-W01-SA-DRA-403-410SXM-ZZZ-EL-DRA-402Please confirm which revisions to be followed, and kindly update the document list accordingly.ANSWER No.128:Please follow the version indicated in SXM-ZZZ-GE-DLT-001_Document List.QUESTION No.129:Considering that;   * In the "SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 - Electrical System Descriptive Report" "3.Demand Estimation"; it is mentioned that "In reference to the Standby generator, the load to be backed-up is around 240 kVA"   * In the "SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 - Electrical System Descriptive Report" "8.Standby Generator"; it is mentioned that "According to power demand calculation (Section 3.3 of SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-702) existing generator of 340 kVA can be used. It is left up to the authorities of the prisons and/or UNOPS whether they decide to update it for a newer model, in which case, Design Practioner advises to follow the same specifications of the existing generator."   * In the "SXM-ZZZ-EL-DRA-402 - General Single Line Diagram and Connection of the Renewable Energy System" drawing; 300 kVA Generator has been indicated.Kindly advise which solution to be considered in the proposal. i.e. Existing Generator to be used, or new Generator to be procured.In case new Generator to be procured; kindly provide related capacity & specification.In case existing 340 kVA generator (confirmed by the Employer as suitable for use) will be used for the new Prison Building, please confirm that the disconnection of the generator from its current location, its handling, and subsequent delivery to the Contractor at the Contractor’s site, in accordance with the Contractor’s programme to facilitate the timely handover of Phase 1, shall be undertaken by the Client. Furthermore, please confirm that any additional measures required to ensure the uninterrupted operation of the existing Prison Building—including, but not limited to, the provision, installation, rental, and subsequent removal of a temporary generator—shall also fall under the Client’s responsibility.ANSWER No.129:The existing 340 kVA generator shall be reused for the new Prison Building as indicated in the SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701

New clarification added: QUESTION No.116:We kindly ask for confirmation that tools, machines, and materials used by inmates in workshops such as following but not limited with these are out of the GC's scope:1. Carpentry/WoodworkingHand tools: hammers, saws, screwdrivers, chisels (with restricted access)Power tools: table saws, drills, sanders (closely supervised)Workbenches, clamps, vises2. Metalwork/WeldingWelding machines (MIG/TIG), angle grindersMetal cutting tools, anvils, forgesSafety equipment: gloves, goggles, aprons3. Textile/SewingIndustrial sewing machinesFabric cutting tablesIrons, thread, scissors4. Automotive RepairVehicle liftsWrenches, diagnostic toolsOil and fluid disposal systems5. Printing/BinderyPrinting pressesBookbinding machinesPaper cutters and folders6. Electronics/Electrical WorkSoldering equipmentWiring tools, testersSmall components for assemblyANSWER No.116:We confirm that the provision of tools, machines, and materials intended for inmate use in the workshops is outside the scope of the General Contractor.QUESTION No.117:We kindly ask for confirmation that appliances like refrigerator, front load washer, microwave etc. are out of the GC's scope.ANSWER No.117:We confirm that it is outside the scope of the General Contractor.QUESTION No.118:At SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701 file Clause 4, Micro Generation facilities are mentioned. When we check the drawings, only Photovoltaic system has been shown. Please confirm that only Photovoltaic system will be installed; and others (Waste to Energy Plant & Small Scale Wind Turbines) will not be considered in the bid.ANSWER No.118:Pease refer to SXM-ZZZ-EL-REP-701Only the photovoltaic system is to be included in the bid. Other micro-generation facilities such as waste-to-energy plants or small-scale wind turbines are not part of the current scope.QUESTION No.119:Dear Procurement Officer, In Part 1: Offeror’s capacity and expertise, it stipulates that "For each experience in the construction of prison buildings no less than 5,000 m², finalized within the last fifteen (15) years, two (2) points will be awarded, up to a maximum of six (6) additional points." Could you kindly confirm whether once the complexity and the overall size of the non-prison building project is more complicated and bigger than the prison project of 5000 m2, then it is satisfied and can obtain points for this specific requirement? Normally speaking, most contractors have not done prison projects but have done a lot of other complicated and big buildings instead? Or alternatively, could you reduce the points (6 points) here and put more points in other requirement/aspects elsewhere? Or delete this requirement? Looking forward to receiving your kind response in this respect.ANSWER No.119:The evaluation criterion regarding specialized experience is maintained. This criterion awards points to offerors with relevant experience in projects similar to the main purpose of this contract. Therefore, failing this specific criteria, only affects the score but it does not lead to a rejection of the offer.QUESTION No.120:Drawings related to "Security" seem missing in the provided Final Executive Design Set.Access Control General Layout & Wards Communication Layout Drawings are provided in "Electrical" package, but they are not indicated in "SXM-ZZZ-GE-DLT-001_Document List - Revision 31032025".CCTV drawings are not provided within the Final Executiva Design Set.Please provide the latest Security drawings.ANSWER No.120:The drawings related to the security systems, including CCTV layouts and other sensitive components, will not be shared at this stage of the process. These documents will only be provided to the awarded contractor following contract signature.QUESTION No.121:Kindly advise the exact tie-in location and layout of existing Utility Lines (including but not limited to Electricity, Water, Gas, Internet etc.) so that the Bidder can foresee and consider related impacts of these existing utilities in line with demolition and earthworks packages.We also would like to have confirmation which Party will be responsible for relocation and connection of these utilities to the current facility during Phase 1 Construction.ANSWER No.121:The exact tie-in locations and layout of existing utility lines (Electricity, Water, Gas, Internet, etc.) can not be confirmed by UNOPS at this stage.Regarding relocation and connection of utilities to the current facility during Phase 1 construction, this falls under the scope and responsibility of the Contractor, and should be considered in the methodology, planning, and pricing of the works.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.111:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 632. Plumbing FixturesReference: Page TechnicalItems:633. Regular toilet634. Vandal-proof toilet635. Regular sink636. Vandal-proof sink637. Kitchen sink638. Built-in lavatory639. Regular accessible shower kit640. Vandal-proof accessible shower kit641. Regular shower kitWe kindly request the contracting authority to provide a detailed plan of the listed fixtures, indicating their installation type (e.g., built-in), construction materials, dimensions, technical specifications, and whether commercial brands will be used. If such information is not available, please indicate in which plan it can be found, or confirm whether it is the contractor’s responsibility to propose it.ANSWER No.111:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702_Technical Specification and SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-800 to 859 and Sanitary drawings.QUESTION No.112:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 795. EquipmentsReference: Page TechnicalItems:796. Countertops797. Toilet BoxWe kindly request the contracting authority to clarify the specific meaning of the terms "Countertops" and "Toilet Box," as well as the scope and technical characteristics required for each.ANSWER No.112:Please refer to SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-800 to 859 for detailed information.QUESTION No.113:Architecture-20250418T165412Z-001Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 62. Vehicle access SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-608-LIFT y SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-704-LIFT DETAILSReference: Page TechnicalThe referenced documents correspond to elevator plans; however, they lack the necessary technical specifications, such as brand, model, capacity (number of persons), materials, and dimensions.ANSWER No.113:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702_Technical Specification, paragraph 3.20 for technical specifications. The lift described in drawings, (see SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-608-LIFT) indicates dimensions that fulfill the requirement of fitting a strecher, per ISO 8100-32: 2020 guidelines.QUESTION No.114:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 18. DemolitionReference: Page TechnicalDemolition Structure Type 1Is it correct to understand that the existing building structures are made of reinforced concrete?ANSWER No.114:Please refer to Section V: Requirements, Schedule 3.1 – Scope of Works, item 1. Demolition.And refer to the document titled "20230814 Architectural As-Built Drawings – Point Blanche Prison" for reference.A site visit has been conducted; bidders are expected to use their professional judgment and expertise to assess the demolition.QUESTION No.115:SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report. 4. General ConsiderationsReference: Page 3 TechnicalFor the TV system, is only the conduit required, or should the scope also include cabling, end-user equipment (televisions), and central equipment (modulators)?ANSWER No.115:Refer to SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report. 4. General ConsiderationsThe scope of the TV system includes the installation of conduits, cabling, and central equipment (such as modulators), as well as system commissioning. End-user equipment, such as television sets, will be supplied by the prison authorities.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.101:Vandal proof housing for MEP equipment located in inmate circulation area in the main building and isolation cell wards are not listed in the BoQ despite they are shown on RCPs and sections. We kindy ask for confirmation if vandal proof housing is being considered in the GC's scope. If so, please provide specifications and detailed drawings.ANSWER No.101:We confirm that the vandal-proof housing is to be included in the General Contractor’s scope of work.Please refer to drawings SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-555 to SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-561 for detailed design and specifications.QUESTION No.102:Material codes for fencing (F01, F02 and W01) in the sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-705 cannot be found in the rest of the project. We kindly ask for clarification regarding which detail will be applied on which part of the fences.ANSWER No.102:All fences in the project will follow the description provided in sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-705QUESTION No.103:Sanitary accessorries like soap dispenser, paper towel dispensers etc for staff / general public bathrooms are being considered as in the GC's scope according to architectural technical specifications, paragraph 3.19.2.3.b. Despite that, such accessories are not mentioned for inmate bathrooms according to paragraph 3.19.2.2.d. We assume that bathrom accessories except for grab bars and fold-down seats for cell bathrooms are not being requested in the GC's scope while all accessories for staff / general public bathrooms are being requested in the GC's scope. Please confirm.ANSWER No.103:We confirm that only grab bars and fold-down seats are considered for inmate bathrooms in the GC's scope, while all accessories for staff and general public bathrooms are included in the GC's scope.QUESTION No.104:According to architectural technical specifications paragraph 3.19.2.1.a, kitchen sinks are in stainless steel counters are being described as below. Despite that, there is no information related to the sinks in concrete countertops. We kindy ask for the specifications for the sinks in concrete countertops.Paragraph 3.19.2.1.a: "The installation of sinks shall be done with deep basins and integrated to the kitchen stainless steel counter, as specified in the design drawings."ANSWER No.104:We confirm that the specifications outlined in paragraph 3.19.2.1 also apply to sinks installed in concrete countertops. Please refer to that section for guidance.QUESTION No.105:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 14 TechnicalHow would it be controlled the aperture of each door cell?ANSWER No.105:The cell doors will be opened manually.QUESTION No.106:Reference: Page TechnicalWhat is meant by the term 'landscaping integration'? It is noted that this aspect is part of one of the plans included in the Environmental PlanANSWER No.106:Could you please clarify the document number and the specific page where the term "landscaping integration" is mentioned?QUESTION No.107:REFERENCIA SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 112. Multipurpose courtReference: Page TechnicalItems:118. Basketball equipment119. Football equipment120. Volleyball equipmentWe kindly request the contracting authority to specify the scope of the mentioned items, including details such as the materials and construction dimensions of the court, as well as the specific equipment to be included under each item. Detailed specifications are requested. Additionally, we request a plan that indicates and details the corresponding construction specifications, including dimensions and anchoring systems.ANSWER No.107:For dimensions of the court please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-706 & SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-702QUESTION No.108:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 112. Multipurpose courtReference: Page TechnicalItems:118. Basketball equipment119. Football equipment120. Volleyball equipmentIs it correct to understand that only one court should be considered for the three items mentioned?ANSWER No.108:Yes, that is correct. A single multipurpose court should be considered to accommodate the basketball, football, and volleyball equipment listed in the BOQ.QUESTION No.109:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 586. WallsReference: Page TechnicalItems:588. CMU walls – Level 0589. CMU walls – Level 1590. CMU walls – Level 2591. CMU walls – Level 3We kindly request the contracting authority to indicate whether a plan is available that clearly specifies the full details of these walls, or alternatively, in which drawing this information can be found. If such documentation is not available, please confirm whether it is the contractor’s responsibility to propose it.ANSWER No.109Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900QUESTION No.110:SXM-ZZZ-GE-BOQ-602_Final Executive Design_Bill Of Quantities Apartado 2. FED BOQ DESIGN 790. OpeningsReference: Page TechnicalItems:791. Aluminum doors793. Aluminum windowsWe kindly request the contracting authority to provide a plan that specifies the complete profile thickness (in inches) for the aluminum doors and windows, or to indicate in which drawing this information can be found. If such documentation is not available, please confirm whether it is the contractor’s responsibility to propose it.ANSWER No.110:Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-902, SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-911, SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-912, SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-710, SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-711 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.96:FS Fire Safety Design "Documento SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report"Reference: Page general TechnicalIs there a single-line diagram or system architecture that shows the distribution of the SLC loops throughout the entire development?ANSWER No.96:The document SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report is not part of the fire safety package, and it is assumed that the reference is to SXM-ZZZ-FS-REP-701_Descriptive Report.There is no specific diagram for the SLC loops. The SLC loop wiring and conduit layout must be determined by the contractor based on the equipment requirements.QUESTION No.97:FS Fire Safety Design "Documento SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report"Reference: Page general TechnicalShould smoke detection be implemented using addressable devices in all areas?ANSWER No.97:The document SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report is not part of the fire safety package, and it is assumed that the reference is to SXM-ZZZ-FS-REP-701_Descriptive Report.Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-FS-REP-701_Descriptive Report which indicates that all area must be equipped by smoke detection using addressable devices.QUESTION No.98:TE Telecommunication Design "Documento SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report"Reference: Page general TechnicalAre there specific brands required for the structured cabling? If so, which ones?ANSWER No.98:There are no specific brand requirements for the structured cabling, provided the proposed system meets the specified criteria.QUESTION No.99:TE Telecommunication Design "Documento SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report"Reference: Page general TechnicalCan routers, switches, and wireless access points (WAPs) be from any brand?ANSWER No.99:There are no specific brand requirements for the routers, switches, and wireless access points (WAPs), provided the proposed system meets the specified criteria.QUESTION No.100:We detected some conflicts between drawing set and the sheet "3. FED GLOBAL FURNITURES", please see some examples (which is not limited by these) below. We kindly request clarification regarding the order of precedence between the drawings and the BoQ in such cases.* Teacher desks are listed in the BoQ for the rooms 035 - Workshop 1, 027 - Workshop 2, 023 - Workshop 3, 016 - Workshop 4, 131 - Workshop 5, 126 - Workshop 6; yet there is no teacher desk in these rooms on layout drawings.* Work stations are listed in the BoQ for the rooms 101 & 107 - inmate intake area, 302 & 308 & 309 - security staff area; yet there is no workstation shown on layout drawings.* Dimensions of works stations in the rooms 031 - observation point workshops 1-2, observation point workshops 3-4, 038 - canteen are different on plan drawings then the dimensions defined in the BoQ.* Workshop tables are listed for the rooms 027 - workshop 1, 023 - workshop 3, 016 - workshop 4, 131 - workshop 5 and 126 workshop 6; yet benches shown on layout drawings are not included in the BoQ.* Shelving space is listed for the rooms 124 - health unit, 226 - classroom 1, 225 - classroom 2, classroom 3, 307 - security staff area; yet there is no shelving space in these rooms on layout drawings.ANSWER No.100:Please refer to 2_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1, which specifies that in the event of discrepancies between the project plans, specifications, and the Bill of Quantities (BoQ), the project plans shall take precedence. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.92:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 13 TechnicalIs there any planned integration with the fire detection panel that would allow for the automatic release of the doors?ANSWER No.92:No integration is planned between the fire detection system and the door control system.QUESTION No.93:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 14 TechnicalAre there any specific requirements regarding the capabilities or brand of the electromechanical locks and card readers? If so, what are those requirements?ANSWER No.93:The proposed electromechanical locks and card readers must meet or exceed the performance and functional requirements specified in document SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701. No specific brands are mandated, provided the proposed systems comply with these requirements.QUESTION No.94:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 7 TechnicalAre there any specific features, capabilities, or brand requirements for the perimeter cable reflectometer sensor? If so, what are they?ANSWER No.94:The proposed perimeter cable reflectometer sensor must meet or exceed the performance and functional requirements outlined in SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701. There are no specific brand requirements, provided the proposed system complies with the specified criteria.QUESTION No.95:FS Fire Safety Design "Documento SXM-ZZZ-TE-REP-701_Descriptive Report"Reference: Page general Technical"Is there a specific brand required for the fire detection system? If so, what is it?ANSWER No.95:There are no specific brand requirements, as long as the proposed system complies with the specified criteria. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.88:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 4, 5 TechnicalSpecify the analytics applicable to each camera, according to the corresponding area (facial recognition, LPR, appearance search, or other)ANSWER No.88:Please refer to document SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701, Section 1.2 “Types of IP Cameras,” where the characteristics and capabilities of each camera type are described.QUESTION No.89:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 4, 5 TechnicalIn which areas is audio recording required?ANSWER No.89:Please refer to document SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701, Section 1.2 “Types of IP Cameras,” where the camera types and their corresponding areas are described. Audio recording is foreseen in the following areas: workshops, kitchen, health area, staff exit, security control, visitor reception area, contact visit room, and limited contact visit room.QUESTION No.90:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page general TechnicalAre there CCTV, perimeter, and access control plans that specify the type of camera assigned to each area? This clarification is requested because, according to the camera description, the quantities add up to a total of 114 units, whereas in the summary table showing the CCTV distribution to the security switches, a total of 198 cameras is indicated.ANSWER No.90:Security system drawings, including CCTV camera positions, cannot be disclosed at this stage and will only be shared with the awarded bidder.Please refer to 2_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1, which specifies that in the event of discrepancies between the project plans, specifications, and the Bill of Quantities (BoQ), the project plans shall take precedence.QUESTION No.91:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 18 TechnicalIs there any other device, in addition to the remote control, that is intended to allow the door to be opened?ANSWER No.91All remotely operated doors are equipped with a manual override. The plans indicate which doors are primarily operated remotely and which are only operated manually. Additionally, only two doors are equipped with card readers on both sides.For further details, please refer to the following drawings: SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-909, SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-910, SXM-ZZZ-SE-DRA-406, and SXM-ZZZ-SE-DRA-408.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.83:As requested in RFP Section 2.2 Qualification Criteria, could you please provide the official letter confirming that our company has already been prequalified?ANSWER No.83:Prequalified bidders should have received their notification. If not, request the confirmation via email: sint.maarten@unops.orgQUESTION No.84:The Health and Safety Specialist position requires a "Bachelor’s degree in Occupational Health and Safety, Environmental Health and Safety, Industrial Hygiene, or related field."Please confirm whether a candidate with a bachelor's degree in engineering, who has been working in the HSE field since graduation and holds relevant HSE certifications, would be considered acceptable for this requirement.ANSWER No.84:It is correct. In Schedule 3.8 (Key Personnel Requirements), the "Required qualification" states "...or related field" which allows offerors to propose personnel based on availability in their country. However, a Bachelor's degree in a related field is mandatory.QUESTION No.85:Dear Procurement Officer, whether the bid can be a completed ONE PDF-format document and sent to the email of sint.maarten@unops.org instead of uploading separate documents in the UNOPS-eSOURCING platform? Or, alternatively, whether the bidder can submit hard-copy bid to the designated physical place of the Employer?ANSWER No.85:Response to this tender is mandatory through the UNOPS eSourcing system, accessible via the UNGM portal. UNGM registration and login are required to access tender details, request clarifications, and submit vendor responses. Please consult the user guide and resources at https://esourcing.unops.org/#/Help/Guides for information on UNGM registration and UNOPS eSourcing submissions.Proposals submitted by email or postal mail to any UNOPS office cannot be considered.QUESTION No.86:As this bid contains two parts, one is technical proposal and the other is financial proposal; and in the RFP document it says "to be substantially compliant, offerors must obtain a minimum threshold of 70% of total points" concerning the technical proposal, could you kindly confirm if the total points of technical proposal can't reach 70 points out of 100 points, whether the financial proposal won't be considered and evaluated by the Employer?ANSWER No.86:You are correct. As stated in the RFP document, to be considered substantially compliant, offerors must obtain a minimum threshold of 70% of the total technical points.  Therefore, if the technical proposal does not achieve the minimum threshold of 70 points out of 100, the financial proposal will not be opened nor evaluated.QUESTION No.87:In the RFP document, we didn't see any description for the procedures and time for the proposal/bid opening meeting, could you kindly clarify the proposal/bid opening meeting details?ANSWER No.87:See Tender Particulars - Opening of proposals: "Public bid opening will not be held".Section 7.4.4 Opening of Proposals (RFP) of the UNOPS´s Procurement Manual, Rev. 7, indicates: "... Once the contract has been awarded, the proposal opening reports shall be available for viewing by bidders who submitted bids and may be made available electronically if the bidder requests a copy. Furthermore, the proposal opening reports will be available only after contract award and will only list prices of the technically compliant offers."

New clarification added: QUESTION No.80In the technical evaluation; "Part 1: Offeror’s capacity and expertise", under section "1.1 Organizational Capacity for Effective Execution", a detailed list of subcontractors, together with Organizational Structure, is required in order to obtain the full 3 points of the Technical Scoring.However, in Section IV Returnable Schedules, note 4.6 Subcontractors, it is stated that subcontractors will not be evaluated at the bidding stage. Please clarify whether the Bidder should include potential anticipated subcontractors to be partnered with in to the "Schedule 4.6: Subcontractors".Kindly elaborate how the scoring will be evaluated in regards to "Schedule 4.6: Subcontractors".ANSWER No.80:If an Offeror explicitly states in Schedule 4.6 that no subcontractors will be utilized for this project, then the evaluation of Criterion 1.1 (Organizational Capacity for Effective Execution) of Part 1: Offeror’s capacity and expertise, will be based solely on the Offeror's own proposed organizational structure.Please note that in Criterion 1.1 (Organizational Capacity for Effective Execution), the section pertaining to Subcontractors is conditional ("If applicable").QUESTION No.81:In "Section II: Evaluation Method and Criteria" under "4.Financial Evaluation", it is stated that "Schedule 4.1.B [Daywork Schedule] will not be used for the financial evaluation but will inform the assessment of reasonableness of cost."Please advise which cost item(s) shall be included in the Schedule 4.1.B [Daywork Schedule].ANSWER No.81:See General Conditions, subclause 1.1 Definitions. "“Daywork Schedule” means the document included in Schedule 4.1.B [Daywork Rates] (if any), showing the amounts and manner of payments to be made to the Contractor for labour, materials and equipment used for daywork under Sub-Clause 13.5 [Daywork]."QUESTION No.82:Under Technical Criteria – "Part 1: Offeror’s Capacity and Expertise", Schedule 4.5 Organizational Structure is requested. Please advise if the Bidder is requested to provide anticipated Project-based Organizational Structure only. Or, should the Organizational Structure include the Bidder's Board Management Structure?Kindly clarify whether additional points to be awarded for the inclusion of women in directorial and management positions are applicable for Project-based Organizational Structure, or also applicable for Bidder's Board Management Structure.ANSWERNo.82:This applies to the Offeror's board management structure.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.73:We kindly ask you to provide the electrical diagram of the GENERAL POWER PANEL BOARD, as it is not present as for all the other electrical panels of the project.ANSWER No.73:Single line digram for the GENERAL POWER PANEL BOARD is shown on drawing SXM-ZZZ-EL-DRA-402 where the GENERAL POWER PANEL BOARD is mentioned as LOW VOLTAGE MAIN PANEL. Complete Electrical diagram shall be presented on shop drawings by the Vendor.QUESTION No.74:Dear Procurement Officer, good day! We made efforts to get done the visa to enter Sint Maarten and we reached Sint Maarten at XXXX am April 23, 2025. After we went through the procedures in the airport and rented the car and checked-in the hotel, it was already XXXXX pm. So unfortunately, we missed the sheduled site visit. We will leave Sint Maarten at XXXXXX, 2025. The purpose of our coming St Maarten is to have a site visit. Site visit is very important for the bidders to prepare the responsive bid. Could you kindly provide us a site visit before we leave the island?ANSWER No.74:We are open to receive requests for an additional site visit. Depending on the number of requests, UNOPS will decide whether to schedule another site visit.QUESTION No.75:Dear Procurement Officer, since this is a governmental public work, could you kindly confirm whether the Turnover Tax (5%) could be exempted by the government?ANSWER No.75:Refer to Tab "TENDER INFORMATION / TENDER PARTICULARS", "Duties and taxes"QUESTION No.76:Dear Procurement Officer, is there any maximum/ceiling number for Joint Venture Members? Two or Three?ANSWER No.76:Tender Documents do not specify a maximum number of members for a Joint Venture (JV) or Consortium.While not mandatory, we strongly advise limiting JV/Consortium membership to a manageable number, ideally no more than three. Larger groups can face increased complexities in coordination, communication, and decision-making, potentially affecting project execution.Bidders should carefully consider the impact of the number of members on the efficiency of their JV/Consortium.QUESTION No.77:Dear Procurement Officer, is there any ceiling/maximum percentage of the works/project that can be subcontracted?ANSWER No.77:Bidders must take into account the instructions regarding Subcontractors indicated in subclause 5.1 Subcontractors of the General Conditions of Contract of the Construction Contract for Major Works.QUESTION No.78:Could you kindly tell us what is the specific procedures for applying work permit for foreign workers in Sint Maarten? How long will the procedures/processes for application of work permits be completed? ANSWER No.78:Please refer to the legal framework report made by Tackling Law and available on the DriveQUESTION No.79:As the bidding document indicates that for the previously successfully  prequalified bidders only need to present the qualification letter instead of the  complete qualification documents, then how to give them scores? As the technical proposal & financial proposal is 60% VS 40%, how will the previously successfully prequalified bidders be evaluated and scored?ANSWER No.79:The technical evaluation process consists in three stages 1. FORMAL AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, 2. QUALIFICATION CRITERIA and 3. TECHNICAL CRITERIA. The first two stages are evaluated on a Pass/Fail basis, only Stage 3 is score based. For Stage 2. QUALIFICATION CRITERIA, prequalified offerors are only required to submit proof of their prequalification status in lieu of the full qualification documentation outlined in that Section of the RFP. Therefore, while prequalified offerors are exempt from submitting the full documentation for Stage 2 (QUALIFICATION CRITERIA), they are still required to submit all necessary documentation for evaluation under Stage 1 (FORMAL AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA) and will be fully evaluated and scored on their submission for Stage 3 (TECHNICAL CRITERIA)

New clarification added: QUESTION No.68:Methodology: 2.1.1 Method StatementReference: Page 7 TechnicalCould you kindly indicate which areas or operational units within UNOPS and the Sint Maarten Correctional Facility will be directly involved in the development, supervision, and execution of the project?ANSWER No.68:UNOPS is the Employer under the contract and is responsible for the overall project management, including oversight, coordination, and quality assurance throughout all phases of the project.The PMT (Prison Management Team) is the beneficiary of the project. While they are not directly involved in contract execution, they provide input during the design and implementation phases to ensure the facility meets operational needs. Close collaboration with the PMT will be essential for the successful implementation of the project, as they serve as the guarantors of security and the main interface with the existing prison operations.QUESTION No.69:Methodology: 2.1.1 Method StatementReference: Page 7 TechnicalIs the participation or coordination with other government entities, local organizations, or international agencies foreseen during the execution of the project? If so, could you please specify which entities will be involved and at what stages they will participate?ANSWER No.69:No participation or coordination with other government entities, local organizations, or international agencies is foreseen during the execution of the project.QUESTION No.70:Reference: TechnicalIs there any hydrological study available to determine whether there are underground water bodies within the project area that could be affected?ANSWER No.70:Please refer to 21999_231210_Geotechnical Report 223-008-1027 [ICE] & SXM-ZZZ-GT-REP-701_REPORTQUESTION No.71:Reference: Page TechnicalIs there any reforestation plan foreseen by the local authorities of the island?ANSWER No.71:Please visit the official website of the Government of Sint Maarten.QUESTION No.72:Reference: Page TechnicalIs there any government entity that provides statistical data—such as population, flora, fauna, climate, traffic, among others—to support the development of an Environmental Plan based on solid and verifiable informationANSWER No.72:Please visit the official website of the Government of Sint Maarten. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.60:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1SECTION II: EVALUATION METHOD ANDCRITERIAPart 1: Offeror’s capacity and expertiseReference: Page 6 AdministrativeWith respect to the Organizational Structure criterion, it is understood that a document is considered complete and detailed when it includes:▪ An organizational chart listing the positions and names of its members, and▪ Supporting documentation of their affiliation.In this regard, we kindly request the contracting authority to confirm whether submitting employment certificates for the individuals listed in the organizational chart is sufficient to meet the requirement of 'supporting documentation of affiliation.ANSWER No.60:That is correct. Employment certificates may serve as supporting documentation. However, UNOPS may request clarification or further information in writing from the offerors as established in Article 26, Section I: Instructions to Offerors.QUESTION No.61:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment13.2 Specifications3.2.M Training requirementsReference: Page 71 AdministrativeIs it correct to understand that the provisions set out in section '3.2.M Training Requirements' are to be considered and submitted after the contract award, in accordance with the documentation and requirements listed in that section?ANSWER No.61:Please refer to the answer to the clarification N°35.QUESTION No.62:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment13.1Reference: Page 55 TechnicalConsidering that only architectural plans are available and there are no records of structural, mechanical, electrical, or other specialty plans, what verification mechanisms or mitigation measures will be implemented to ensure that critical infrastructure essential to the penitentiary’s operations is not compromised during demolition activities?ANSWER No.62:Please refer to the answer to the clarification N°36.QUESTION No.63:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 90-96 TechnicalAre the requested plans (such as the demolition plan, risk management plan, schedule, and financial proposal) required to align with the PMI methodology proposed for project management?ANSWER No.63:Please refer to the answer to the clarification N°37.QUESTION No.64:"Documento 3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedulesSchedule 4.4 [Key Personnel]Schedule 4.5 [Organizational Structure]]"Reference: Page 24 AdministrativeWith reference to the requirement stating: 'The composition and structure of the proposed team are appropriate, and the proposed roles of the management and Key Personnel team are suitable for the performance of the required Works', could you please confirm whether the requested information —including the description of functions, profiles, and supporting documentation— applies exclusively to the Key Personnel?ANSWER No.64:Regarding Schedule 4.5 Organizational Structure, offerors are expected to submit a company organizational chart that also includes personnel assigned to the works. This chart should clearly identify the governance structure during project execution. Bidders are encouraged to include sufficient information within this schedule to allow verification of technical criteria 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1, such as brief function descriptions, names, and reporting lines. UNOPS may request clarification or further information in writing from the offerors as established in Article 26, Section I: Instructions to Offerors.QUESTION No.65:3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedulesReference: Page 24 AdministrativeRegarding the evaluation criteria applicable to the Construction Manager, Quality Control Manager, HSSE Specialist, and Liaison Officer, could you please confirm whether it is acceptable to submit a professional degree, proof of studies, or a certificate of completion of studies that certifies the required or related studies, in order to meet the corresponding requirement?ANSWER No.65:To verify the qualifications of key personnel, a copy of their professional degree or certification will be required, demonstrating completion and legal authorization to practice the relevant profession. UNOPS may request clarification or further information in writing from the offerors as established in Article 26, Section I: Instructions to Offerors.QUESTION No.66:3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedulesReference: Page 24 AdministrativeWith respect to the evaluation criterion for the Construction Manager, Quality Control Manager, HSSE Specialist, and Liaison Officer, could you please confirm whether submitting a Curriculum Vitae detailing the project names, roles performed, and years of participation in each is sufficient to validate the professional experience of these profiles?ANSWER No.66:In order to expedite the evaluation process, offerors are encouraged to submit, along with a thoroughly filled out "Schedule 0.5 Format for Resume of Proposed Key Personnel", all relevant documents providing experience and qualifications. However, UNOPS may request clarification or further information in writing from the offerors as established in Article 26, Section I: Instructions to Offerors.QUESTION No.67:Methodology: 2.1.1 Method StatementReference: Page 7 TechnicalShould the methodology to be applied for the development of this section correspond to the knowledge areas established in the best practices of the Project Management Institute (PMI)?"ANSWER No.67:Based on the provided document "Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1.pdf,"The requested methodology are not required to align with the Project Management Institute (PMI) methodology.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.54:Cell mirrors are not listed in the BoQ despite they are shown on layout drawings. We kindly ask for confirmation if these mirrors are being considered in the GC's scope. If so, please provide specifications.ANSWER No.54:Tamper proof mirror providing enhanced visibility of the cell are included.QUESTION No.55:Cell bathrom curtains are not listed in the BoQ despite curtain detail is shown in the detail 8/851. We kindy ask for confirmation if cell bathroom curtains are being considered in the GC's scope. If so, please provide specifications.ANSWER No.55:The cell bathroom curtains shown in detail 8/851 are not included in the current scope of the General Contractor. However, the GC is required to provide the necessary concrete reveal to allow for potential installation at a later stage.QUESTION No.56:We kindly ask for enlarged drawings for standard individual cell bath and accessible shared cell bath.ANSWER No.56:Please refer to SXM-W01-AR-DRA-850 and SXM-W01-AR-DRA-852QUESTION No.57:According to architectural technical specifications paragraph 3.19.2.2, bathroom fixtures for inmates are described as vandal resistant, please see related parts of specifications below. Despite that; in the sheet SXM-W01-AR-DRA-857, bathroom fixtures are not described as vandal resistant. Since specifications are prior to drawings, we assume that all bathrom fixtures in inmate cells to be vandal resistant. Please confirm.Paragraph 3.19.2.2.c: "Toilets in inmate bathrooms shall be floor-mounted, vandal-resistant units made from stainless steel or other durable materials."Paragraph 3.19.2.2.d: "Sinks in inmate bathrooms should be stainless steel wall-mounted models, as indicated in project drawings. These sinks must be designed to resist vandalism and feature integrated, tamper-proof faucets with anti-splash designs."Paragraph 3.19.2.2.d: "The shower faucets in inmate bathrooms must be made of heavy-duty materials such as brass or stainless steel to withstand frequent use and potential vandalism."ANSWER No.57:Yes, all bathroom fixtures in inmate cells are to be vandal-resistant, in accordance with the requirements outlined in paragraph 3.19.2.2 of the Architectural Technical Specifications.QUESTION No.58:We kindly request access to the "technical access" documents of RFP/202/56497 Construction of the Point Blanche Prison and House of Detention in Sint Maarten, Dutch Caribbean.ANSWER No.58:Please refer to UNOPS CLARIFICATION No.1. Access to the technical documentation requires strict adherence to the instructions provided on the eSourcing platform. Specifically, go to the 'TENDER INFORMATION' tab, select 'TENDER PARTICULARS,' and consult the 'Additional Information' clause for detailed access guidance.QUESTION No.59:In the RFP document-Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1, it stipulates that in 2. QUALIFICATION CRITERIA-"Minimum of 8 turnkey projects at least 75% completed in the last 15 years as General Contractor. Each project must have a minimum construction area of 8,000 m2 of vertical infrastructure. The Bidder must provide the corresponding support documents: Signed contract and certification of completion of each of the contracts emitted by the Client or Funding Source." However, it also stipulates that in 3. TECHNICAL CRITERIA -"For each experience of construction contracts for buildings (vertical infrastructure) of more than 10,000 m² finalized at least 75% completed within the last fifteen (15) years, one (1) point will be awarded up to a maximum of eight (8) points." Could you kindly verify whether it is 8,000 m2 for each project or 10,000 m² for each project? Also, whether the quantity for projects can be less than 8, but the total construction area for the total projects is bigger than 8*8000M2 or 8*10000M2 is qualified and can obtain/get the full 8 points? For example, within the last 15 years, the contractor only has 3 vertical infrastructure projects but the total construction area is 200000M2 which is much bigger than the required construction area. Whether in this case, the contractor can be qualified and get the 8 points? Looking for the kind response in this regard. Thanks a lot.ANSWER No.59:To clarify, please note that the qualification and technical criteria serve distinct purposes in the evaluation process:Qualification Criteria: As stated in the document, the Qualification Criteria (specifically point 2) require a minimum of eight (8) turnkey projects at least 75% completed in the last 15 years as General Contractor.Each of these eight (8) projects must have a minimum construction area of 8,000 m² of vertical infrastructure.These criteria are used to determine the eligibility of a bidder to proceed to the technical evaluation stage. Meeting these criteria is mandatory to be considered for further evaluation.Technical Criteria: The Technical Criteria (specifically point 3) are used to score the proposals based on the bidder's experience.Under the Technical Criteria, one (1) point will be awarded for each experience of construction contracts for buildings (vertical infrastructure) of more than 10,000 m², finalized at least 75% completed within the last fifteen (15) years, up to a maximum of eight (8) points.Addressing your specific questions:Regarding the area: It is crucial to understand that the Qualification Criteria require 8,000 m² per project, while the Technical Criteria award points for projects exceeding 10,000 m². These are separate requirements for different evaluation stages.Regarding the number of projects and total area:For Qualification, the bidder must demonstrate a minimum of eight (8) projects, each meeting the 8,000 m² requirement. Having a smaller number of projects, even with a very large total area, will not meet the Qualification Criteria. Therefore, in your example of three projects totaling 200,000 m², the bidder would not qualify.For Technical Scoring, only projects exceeding 10,000 m² are awarded points. The total area is not a factor in the Technical Criteria scoring; points are awarded per qualifying project (up to a maximum of 8 points).In summary, the 8,000 m² requirement is a pass/fail threshold for Qualification, while the 10,000 m² requirement is a scoring mechanism for the Technical Evaluation.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.49:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 63 TechnicalFor the submission of the budget or the bill of quantities with unit prices and corresponding partial totals, will it be necessary to provide the unit price breakdown matrices for each item included in the BoQ? Additionally, will it be required to submit the detailed analysis of cost overruns, including indirect costs, financing, profit, and, if applicable, additional charges?ANSWER No.49:As stated in Schedule 4: CONTRACT SCHEDULES FROM THE OFFEROR, Schedule 4.1.A, UNOPS reserves the right to request a detailed unit price breakdown and indirect cost information from offerors during the evaluation stage for cost analysis and verification. The successful offeror shall provide a comprehensive unit price breakdown upon award, which will be integrated into the contract documents.QUESTION No.50:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 66-67 TechnicalShould the tests derived from the quality management system be included as part of the direct cost of the works within each work item, or can they be considered under cost overruns as indirect expenses?ANSWER No.50:Offerors have the flexibility to define their cost strategy. However, as stated in Schedule 4: CONTRACT SCHEDULES FROM THE OFFEROR, Schedule 4.1.A, UNOPS reserves the right to request a detailed unit price breakdown and indirect cost information from offerors during the evaluation stage for cost analysis and verification. The successful offeror shall provide a comprehensive unit price breakdown upon award, which will be integrated into the contract documents.QUESTION No.51:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 100 TechnicalCan all charges related to the issuance of contractual guarantees, as well as the various insurance policies required for the execution of the works, be included in the cost overrun analysis as part of the indirect expenses?ANSWER No.51:Offerors shall include the costs of bonds and insurance within their indirect costs in the financial proposal. UNOPS reserves the right to request a detailed breakdown of these indirect costs during proposal evaluation.QUESTION No.52:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page TechnicalConsidering that at least 20% of the workforce must be sourced from the area where the project site is located, the following information is requested to determine and calculate the integrated salary:Official non-working days on the island.Base salary scale applicable to the construction and industrial sectors in the project area.List of official social benefits related to health and similar services provided to workers in the region or country, as granted by the government or the officially recognized authority."ANSWER No.52:It´s offerors' responsibility to verify applicable legislation. Please refer to the official websites of the Government of Sint Maarten.QUESTION No.53:Reference: Page LegalWe kindly request the contracting authority to indicate the percentage that should be considered for the bid bond, as this information is not specified in the RFP or the annexed documents.ANSWER No.53:Please note that no financial Bid Secutiry is requested for this tender. According to tab "TENDER INFORMATION / TENDER PARTICULARS / Proposal security details", Offerors shall submit a Bid Securing Declaration as part of the proposal as set out in Schedule 0.8 [Form for Proposal Security] 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.45:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 55 - 61 TechnicalConsidering that this annex defines the two construction phases related to the access zones (Zone 01 for external access and Zone 02 for current internal access), as well as the two mobilizations or relocations to be carried out, is there any plan or guideline that provides a reference framework for planning the access routes and the temporary actions required during the relocation of inmates and staff between Construction Phase 01 and Phase 02?ANSWER No.45:While UNOPS and the Prison Management Team have confirmed the physical feasibility of the access routes and have drafted a preliminary solution, there is no fixed plan or guideline currently in place. The Contractor will be required to propose access routes and temporary measures that align with the security requirements and the nature of the works for each construction phase. These proposals will be subject to review and approval, and may be accepted, revised, or used as a basis for alternative solutions agreed upon by all parties.QUESTION No.46:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page TechnicalConsidering that only architectural plans of the existing buildings are available, under which section of the bill of quantities or the contract scope can the costs related to the survey of the main installations of these buildings be included, in order to reduce induced works and prevent accidents or incidents during their demolition?ANSWER No.46:The document specifies that the demolition must occur after the completion of the first stage of construction to ensure continuous operation of the existing facilities. The costs associated with surveying these installations would likely be included in the Bill of Quantities (BoQ) under the demolition scope of work "Demolition structure type 1".QUESTION No.47:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 56 TechnicalWhat are the dates and timeframes established for the two mobilizations that must be considered in the development of the work schedules?ANSWER No.47:The document states that the program should cover the mobilization, but it does not specify exact dates or timeframes for two separate mobilizations. It does state that the Time for Completion for the whole of the Works is 31 months, including 1 month for mobilization.QUESTION No.48:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 64-65 TechnicalShould the costs for performing all system tests, following the completion of the works indicated in section 3.2.b, be included within the scope of the bill of quantities for the corresponding equipment and/or systems? This applies to fire protection systems, water supply, sanitary drainage, wastewater treatment plant, electrical system, telecommunications, security, HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), and gas systemANSWER No.48:Offerors have the flexibility to define their cost strategy. However, UNOPS reserves the right to request a detailed unit price breakdown and indirect cost information from offerors during the evaluation stage for cost analysis and verification. The successful offeror shall provide a comprehensive unit price breakdown upon award, which will be integrated into the contract documents. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.43:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page general TechnicalWould it be possible to share the layout plans for the access control, CCTV, and perimeter security solutions?"ANSWER No.43:The layout plans for the access control, CCTV, and perimeter security solutions will not be shared at this stage of the tender process, as they contain sensitive security information.QUESTION No.44:Sección I: Instrucciomnes a los Oferentes, Artículo 4 Eligibilidad del Oferente, Inciso (vii), parrafo segundoReference: Page Pag. 3 LegalRegarding the joint participation in this RFP, in our case, two companies belonging to the same corporate group intend to submit a proposal. We kindly request clarification on whether both companies must be registered in the UNOPS Sourcing platform and individually express their interest, or if it is sufficient for only the company holding the majority representation to do so.ANSWER No.44:Please note that all members of a Joint Venture or Consortium are required to register with the United Nations Global Marketplace (UNGM). While individual registration is necessary for all members, we recommend that the proposal submission be carried out using the UNGM account of the lead member. Concerning the eSourcing platform, it is sufficient for the lead firm to formally express its interest in the tender.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.35:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment13.2 Specifications3.2.M Training requirementsReference: Page 71 AdministrativeIs it correct to understand that the provisions set out in section '3.2.M Training Requirements' are to be considered and submitted after the contract award, in accordance with the documentation and requirements listed in that section?ANSWER No.35:The provisions outlined in section '3.2.M Training Requirements' are contractual obligations that the Contractor is expected to fulfill. While the section details the expected content and scope of the training, it does not specify a definitive timeline for the full submission of training plans. However, as the training is linked to the project's mobilization phases, it is anticipated that detailed training plans and materials will be developed and submitted progressively for approval in alignment with those phases.QUESTION No.36:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment13.1Reference: Page 55 TechnicalConsidering that only architectural plans are available and there are no records of structural, mechanical, electrical, or other specialty plans, what verification mechanisms or mitigation measures will be implemented to ensure that critical infrastructure essential to the penitentiary’s operations is not compromised during demolition activities?ANSWER No.36:The available as-built documentation is limited to architectural plans provided by the Prison Management Team.To ensure critical infrastructure is not compromised during demolition, the Contractor will be required to submit a demolition approach for prior approval, in line with applicable standards and project requirements. Mitigation measures will be coordinated with relevant stakeholders as needed.QUESTION No.37:Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1Reference: Page 90-96 TechnicalAre the requested plans (such as the demolition plan, risk management plan, schedule, and financial proposal) required to align with the PMI methodology proposed for project management?ANSWER No.37:Based on the provided document "Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V_Amendment1.pdf,"The requested plans, including the demolition plan, risk management plan, schedule, and financial proposal, are not required to align with the Project Management Institute (PMI) methodology.QUESTION No.38:"Documento 3_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_VI_ReturnableSchedules● 4.6 SubcontratistasSchedule 4.6 [Subcontractors]"Reference: Page 24 AdministrativeRegarding the additional points for the inclusion of women in management and leadership positions, could you clarify whether it is sufficient to indicate the gender in the organizational chart or structure?ANSWER No.38:To clarify, just showing gender on the chart is not enough. You also need to provide the chart and supporting documents that prove women are in those roles. Examples include official records or detailed resumes or supporting documentation of belonging.The Evaluation Committee can ask for more information if needed.QUESTION No.39:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 3, 4 TechnicalWould it be possible to propose alternative brands for the platforms, equipment, licenses, switching devices, and integration of the security solution for CCTV, access control, and perimeter systems?ANSWER No.39:It is allowed to propose any brand as long as the technical and functional parametres are met.QUESTION No.40:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 4 TechnicalIs it necessary to strictly comply with the specific hardware capacity requirements for the equipment, or can the most appropriate requirements for each scene be proposed in accordance with best security practices?ANSWER No.40:As “best security practices” can be subjective and vary by provider, bidders are expected to strictly comply with the hardware capacity requirements as specified in the document.QUESTION No.41:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page 10 TechnicalIs the use of Cisco Catalyst switches mandatory for the CCTV system, or is it possible to meet the specification with equipment from other manufacturers?ANSWER No.41:It is not mandatory. Other manufacturers meeting the same or higher specifications are also compatible with the CCTV system.QUESTION No.42:SE Security System "Documento SXM-ZZZ-SE-REP-701"Reference: Page general TechnicalCan cameras from any manufacturer that comply with weatherproof protection certifications be used without being subject to additional restrictions?ANSWER No.42:It is allowed to propose any brand as long as the technical and functional parametres are met and requirements respected. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.26:Please advise how many working days to be considered in the "Schedule of Works" for the PMT to Mobilize/Move-In to the newly built North Building and South Wards after the Construction Stage 1 is completed; considering that the Contractor will not be able to work during this mobilization period, as the Construction Stage 1 is complete and Demolition of Existing Building can not be started.ANSWER No.26:A reasonable duration should be allocated in the Schedule of Works to allow the PMT to mobilize and move into the North Building and South Wards after completion of Construction Stage 1. This period—during which the Contractor will remain inactive and demolition activities cannot begin—should be confirmed in coordination with the PMT during the early planning phase to ensure alignment with operational requirements.QUESTION No.27:Considering the fact that current design and drawings provided by Employer are not IFC (Issued for Construction) but FED (Final Execution Design); please confirm if the cost & duration to be committed for Final Executive Design to IFC development shall be considered in proposal.ANSWER No.27:The process of developing Issued for Construction (IFC) drawings falls under the Contractor's scope of work. Consequently, the Contractor's proposal must incorporate the costs and the time required to produce these IFC drawings.QUESTION No.28:As per "Section IV: Schedule of Details, c.5. The Engineer facilities" (page 41/102); the Contractor shall provide Engineer Facility during construction period.Please advise where the Engineer Facility is required to be established. Should it be located within the construction boundry? Or, is it possible to establish the facility to some other location, such as across the road of the site?ANSWER No.28:While the documents indicate the Engineer's office should be part of the Contractor's site facility and close to the construction site, it doesn't prohibit locating it across the road. The key is that the Engineer's facilities must be functionally integrated with the Contractor's site setup to allow for effective supervision and coordination.QUESTION No.29:Under  the Section IV: Schedule of Details (page 48 of 102), it is mentioned that "At least two (2) closed perimeters of security must be in place at all times during the different construction stages. "Please confirm if the Existing Security Wall 4.5m shall be considered as one (1) closed perimeter of security, so that only one (1) other temporary perimeter of security would be sufficient to correspond to the abovementioned requirement.Also please advise whether one (1) closed perimeters of security shall be sufficient to provide "Inmate Flow" after Construction Stage 1 is finished, between the corridor of new main building & new wards and the the area of Contruction 2.1. and Construction 2.2.ANSWER No.29:Yes, the existing 4.5m security wall can be considered as one perimeter of security, provided it meets the requirements outlined in the Site Security Plan. Section 4.8. If the existing wall meets these criteria, it can be considered one perimeter.Regarding inmate flow, one closed perimeter of security may be sufficient, but this requires careful planning and approval. The same document emphasizes the need to eliminate visibility and contact between the construction site and prison operations. While a single perimeter might achieve this, the Contractor must detail how it will ensure security and controlled inmate flow in their Site Establishment Plan and Traffic Management Plan. Ultimately, UNOPS and the Prison Management Team retain the authority to review and approve the Contractor's proposed solution, considering the specifics of each construction stage and the proposed mitigation measures.QUESTION No.30:Could you please share the contact information of the owners of the plots available for rent across the road?ANSWER No.30:The contact information of the plot owners across the road will be shared exclusively with the awarded offeror.QUESTION No.31:Kindly advise the exact Location and characteristic information (dimension, depth, material etc.) of the existing septic tank to be demolished.In case the demolish of the existing septic tank coincides with the Construction Phase 1 structures, please clarify which party will be responsible for temporary septic tank and its connections to the existing facility.ANSWER No.31:The exact location of the existing septic tank to be demolished can be found in the SXM-ZZZ-SA-DRA-101.The Contractor is responsible for providing a temporary septic tank and its connections to the existing facility. This responsibility falls under the Contractor's obligation to maintain site services during construction. Please refer to SXM-ZZZ-SA-REP-703_Technical Specifications.QUESTION No.32:The Bidder kindly requests the specification related to "Textured Concrete" which is specified in the Wall Types of C04, C05, C07ANSWER No.32:Please refer to the Architectural specifications for descriptions regarding formwork (p.19) to be used in order to create the vertical rippled effect wherever textured concrete is indicated in the drawings.QUESTION No.33:Dear Procurment Officer, which party will be responsible for the security for the prisoners during the whole construction period as the prisoners will be transferred to the new facilities in phases? The Employer or the Contractor?ANSWER No.33:The security of the prisoners throughout the construction period will be entirely and solely managed by the Prison Management. The Contractor’s role will be limited to ensuring clear and unobstructed spaces and access routes, and to refraining from work in specific areas as agreed in advance by all parties.QUESTION No.34:Dear Procurement Officer, as this is the public works of government, whether both the work permit and residence permit can be waived/exempted by the government of st maarten? As these costs will be added into the bid price and acturally borne by the Employer and the process for getting done those two permits for the workers will take a comparatively long period which will affect the construction period.ANSWER No.34:Offerors are required to comply with all legal procedures related to obtaining work and residence permits in Sint Maarten. For detailed guidance, please refer to the document titled 'Tackling Law – UNOPS Memo: Mapping of Legal Procedures for Foreign Companies and Personnel in Sint Maarten.pdf'. Please note that there are no explicit provisions for waivers or exemptions based on the project’s classification as public works. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No.19:General details for wall & floor assemblies (ref. sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900 & 901) do not comply with the material descriptions with the legend in plan drawings (ref. sheet SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-500 & 501 & 502 & 503 & 504 and SXM-W01-AR-DRA-506 & 507 & 508 & 509), please see the conflicts listed below. We kindly ask for confirmation of material tags and material description of each tag mentioned.* G01 is gypsum wall in general details despite it is described as acoustic removable ceiling in the legend of plan drawings.* C02 is textured concrete wall  in general details despite it is described as both cement board (exterior) ceiling and exterior finished concrete floor in the legend of plan drawings.* G03 is not included in general details despite it is described as gypsum board ceiling in the legend of plan drawings.* C01 is concrete wall in general details despite it is described as finished concrete floor in the legend of plan drawings.* C02 is concrete wall with latex paint in general details despite it is described as finished concrete floor in the legend of plan drawings.* F01 is concrete slab with poliurethane coating in general details despite it is described as raised access floor in the legend of plan drawings.ANSWER No.19:Finishes Legend appearing in sheets SXM-MBU-AR-DRA-500 & 501 & 502 & 503 & 504 and SXM-W01-AR-DRA-506 & 507 & 508 & 509 has an independant nomenclature and applies only to the outermost layer affecting the finish of each component.Wall assemblies and floor assembly nomenclature is independant from material finishes. For example, G01 in sheet SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-900 - Wall Assemblies refers to a complete wall type assembly and it's finish may vary accoring to the Finishes Legend between T01 - ceramic tyle, P01 - Latex paint, etc.QUESTION No.20:2 different room tags are being used for 1 room in the main building; 307 and 309. We kindly ask for confirmation of the number and function of the room mentioned.ANSWER No.20:The room is divided in two areas that have different functions but they are integrated in a single space. The names have been preserved for better undestranding of the Prison Management team, as these tasks originally did not share a space. Along the design process it has been deemed convenient to have these spaces function together.QUESTION No.21:We kindly ask you to confirm if the project is duty free.ANSWER No.21:Please refer to Tender Particulars - Duties and taxesQUESTION No.22:The tender documents provide for a completion time of the works equal to 31 months + 1 month of mobilization. We kindly ask you to confirm if the project is duty free.ANSWER No.22:Please refer to the answers to the clarification N°21 and N°23.QUESTION No.23:The tender documents provide for a completion time of the works equal to 31 months + 1 month of mobilization. We ask if this period is mandatory or, if it is considered insufficient, if the technical-economic offer is taken into consideration, or rejected and/or not considered.ANSWER No.23:Bidders are expected to adhere to the execution timeframe established in the requirements. Bidders must adjust their methodology and resources to meet this requirement. The proposed completion timeframe will be assessed as part of the technical evaluation criteria, and scoring will be allocated accordingly based on the rationale and feasibility presented.QUESTION No.24:The works involve the demolition of large concrete parts and the demolition of very compact rocky terrain. These operations will create a lot of vibrations and a lot of noise. We ask you if the mitigation of these factors is the responsibility and therefore must be provided for by the bidder, or if nothing should be provided for such mitigation works.ANSWER No.24:The contractor is responsible for developing and implementing appropriate mitigation measures to address potential vibration and noise impacts resulting from demolition activities, including large concrete structures and compact rocky terrain.Your technical proposal should detail the specific methods and strategies you will employ to minimize these disturbances at the prison facility and in the surrounding environment. This may include alternative construction techniques or/and any other relevant measures.The effectiveness and comprehensiveness of your proposed Method Statement, Work Methodology, Demolition Plan, and/or HSSE Plan will be evaluated as part of the technical assessment.QUESTION No.25:The works involve the demolition of large concrete parts and the demolition of very compact rocky terrain. These operations will create a lot of vibrations and a lot of noise. We ask you if the mitigation of these factors is the responsibility and therefore must be provided for by the bidder, or if nothing should be provided for such mitigation works.ANSWER No.25:Please refer to answer to clarification N°24

New amendment added #2: AMENDMENT No.2Offerors are advised to review the following modifications carefully and incorporate it into their proposals:1. In the "TENDER INFORMATION / DOCUMENTS" tab of the eSourcing platform, the following changes have been made:File “4_RFP-2025-56497_Technical Annexes_Amendment2.pdf” has been added in lieu of file “4_RFP-2025-56497_Technical Annexes_Amendment1.pdf”Please be advised that the information presented to bidders directly reflects the photographic registry compiled during the site visit conducted on April 23rd.All other sections and documents of RFP No. RFP/2025/56497 remain unchanged and in full effect.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.18:In Section V: Reqirements Schedule 3.1.1 Demolition; it is stated that the debris and construction material resulting from the demolitions will be transported by truck to the Pond Island landfill, located in Philipsburg. The Bidder would like to know whether the dumping of debris/construction material resulting from demolition will be dumped to Pond Island Landfill free-of-charge, or the mandatory fee need to be paid every trip by the Contractor.ANSWER No.18:The Contractor is responsible for including all costs associated with debris disposal at the Pond Island landfill in their offer. This includes any applicable fees. Refer to Subclause 4.10, 'Sufficiency of the Accepted Contract Amount' of the General Conditions of Contract for the Construction Contract for Major Works located in Section III CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT, which states that the contract amount covers all the Contractor's obligations, including all things necessary for the proper execution of the works.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.14:Based on the document SXM-ZZZ-AR-REP-701, paragraph 4 on page 11; extreme natural conditions such as hurricanes are to be considered for the project. We assume that the project is to be compliant with high velocity hurricane zone requirements especially for exterior elements since St Maarten is in high velocity hurricane zone. Please confirm.ANSWER No.14:We confirm that extreme natural conditions such as hurricanes must be considered in the project, particularly for the specification of exterior elements, in accordance with the project requirements and local context.QUESTION No.15:Equipment and furniture in Gym 1 & 2 (rooms 227 & 230) in the main building are not listed in the BoQ. We kindly ask for confirmation if gym equipment to be in GC's scope. If it is requested within GC's scope, please share detailed list and specifications of gym equipment.ANSWER No.15:Gym equipment and furniture in Gym 1 & 2 (rooms 227 & 230) are not within the scope of the General Contractor. No list or specifications will be provided.QUESTION No.16:Equipment and furniture in Barbers & Hairdressers room (the room 111) in the main building are not listed in the BoQ. We kindly ask for confirmation if barber & hairdressers equipment to be in GC's scope. If it is requested within GC's scope, please share detailed list and specifications of barber & hairdressers equipment.ANSWER No.16:Barber & hairdresser equipment and furniture in room 111 (Barbers & Hairdressers room) are not within the scope of the General Contractor. No list or specifications will be provided.QUESTION No.17:We kindly request clarification regarding the order of precedence in the event of any discrepancies between the Specifications, Reports, and Drawings.ANSWER No.17:See Subclause 1.5 "Priority of Documents" of the General Conditions of Contract for the Construction Contract for Major Works located in Section III CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT.

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 13: Dear Procurement Officer, good day! Could you kindly provide several site visits (consecutive or non-consecutive) as we may not meet the site visit for April 23, 2025? We think the site visit is very important for the bid preparation. Or, whether we can come another day and some specific officer in St Maarten can guide us to the site and give us the instruction for the site? Looking forward to your kind reply, thanks a lot!ANSWER No. 13:We strongly recommend to attend the site visit scheduled for April 23, 2025, however, we are open to receive requests for an additional site visit. Depending on the number of requests, UNOPS will decide whether to schedule another site visit.

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 10:Could you kindly arrange another pre-bid meeting for those bidders who missed the pre-bid meeting? Do you have the video-recording for the pre-bid meeting to share with the bidders?  Also, could you kindly share with us bidders the pre-bid meeting minutes for reference?ANSWER No. 10:The pre-bid meeting minutes and presentation are available on the Documents tab of the RFP. No other pre-bid meeting is scheduled.QUESTION No. 11:What is the financing source for this project? Is this project co-financed by government of Sint Maarten and the Dutch Ministry of Internal Affairs and Kingdom Relations?ANSWER No. 11:See Section IV: Schedule of Details - Schedule 2: Project Specifc Information - 2.1 Project Details - c.2. Agreement with UNOPSQUESTION No. 12:What is the Employer and Employer's address for this project? And what is the project implementation/execution unit for this project?ANSWER No. 12:The employer will be UNOPS. This project will be implemented by the UNOPS office in Sint Maarten.

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 9:Could you kindly share with us all the bidding documents except for the four documents attached? As we try to get access to other documents, it was denied. My email address is xxxxxxxx, could you kindly send me the link to my email address for downloading all the bidding documents?ANSWER No. 9:Please be advised that access to the files has been granted to the registered offerors.

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 7:Reference is made to document n. 2_Major_Works_RFP-2025-56497_Section_II_III_IV_V3.5 Programme Requirementsa. Schedule for WorksThe Contractor must present a Schedule for Works in accordance with Sub-Clause 8.3 of the General Conditions. Additionally, the Schedule for Works must comply with the following minimum technical requirements:⬝ It must present the duration, start date, and scheduled end date for each activity. No activity can have a duration greater than 14 calendar days.Our question: We kindly ask you to specify what is meant with the statement that "No activity can have a duration greater than 14 calendar days" as we believe that many activities will last longer than 14 days.ANSWER No. 7: See Amendment No. 1. Please be advised that the requirement stating that "no activity can have a duration greater than 14 calendar days" is hereby removed. Bidders are permitted to define activity durations based on the technical and operational requirements of the project. The Schedule for Works must still clearly indicate the duration, start date, and scheduled end date for each activity, in accordance with Sub-Clause 8.3 of the General Conditions.QUESTION No. 8:Revision numbers and issue dates on PDF files do not comply with DWG files for several sheets, please see some examples (which is not limited by these sheets) below. We kindly ask for confirmation of which version to be followed. If PDF files are leading, we kindly ask for the vectoral drawings complient with PDF sheets.SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-100: PDF is R6, DWG is R5.SXM-ZZZ-AR-DRA-203: PDF is R5, DWG is R6.ANSWER No. 8: See Amendment No. 1. An updated version of the Final Executive Design has been added to the Technical Annexes. 

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 5:We kindly request a 4-week extension to the submission deadline, so that we have the time necessary to develop the most competitive bid possible with our local and regional partners.ANSWER No. 5:See Amendment No. 1. We acknowledge your request and confirm that a 1 month extension to the submission deadline is granted. However, please note that no further extensions will be provided beyond this period. QUESTION No. 6:Will the client consider relevant experience references that are not completed prior to the date of award of this project?ANSWER No. 6: See Amendment No. 1. UNOPS will consider relevant experience references for projects that are at least 75% completed prior to the RFP Deadline. Such references should clearly demonstrate substantial progress and alignment with the scope and requirements outlined in the tender.  

New amendment added #1: Refer to Amendment No. 1 under the Documents tab for further information.

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 4:We tried to apply for access to Google Drive again, but it seems that it still hasn't been approved. My access account is still XXXXXXXANSWER No. 4:Access to the files has been granted to the authorized email addresses of the registered offerors. To request the addition of email addresses, please resubmit the GForm including all formally authorized email addresses. Access to the technical files will be granted upon completion of the GForm, indicating all authorized email addresses, as per our established procedure.

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 3: In order to obtain more bidding documents, we have initiated access to Google Drive, and the access account is XXXXXXXXX. But it seems to have never passed.ANSWER No. 3:We confirm that access to the files has been granted to the authorized email addresses of the registered offerors

New clarification added: QUESTION No. 2:It appears that downloads are blocked for some files within the "4. Final Executive Design" folder on Google Drive. Specifically, we are unable to download files that were last modified on 17 March 2025. Can UNOPS please provide us access to download these files? ANSWER No.2:Please be advised that access to the files has been granted to the registered offerors.

New clarification added: QUESTION No.1: We want to obtain the corresponding files on ANNEXES, but access to the link requires permission.ANSWER No.1:Please refer to UNOPS CLARIFICATION No. 1. Access to the technical documentation requires strict adherence to the instructions provided on the eSourcing platform. Specifically, go to the 'TENDER INFORMATION' tab, select 'TENDER PARTICULARS,' and consult the 'Additional Information' clause for detailed access guidance.

New clarification added: UNOPS CLARIFICATION No.1:To obtain access to the technical documentation, Offerors are required to strictly adhere to the instructions provided within the eSourcing platform. Specifically, please navigate to the 'TENDER INFORMATION' tab, then select 'TENDER PARTICULARS,' and refer to the clause titled 'Additional Information' for detailed guidance on the access procedure.